Indivisos, esquema colectivo y prácticas de propiedad campesina en Colombia
This article examines an under-explored dimension of agrarian reform and peasant studies in Colombia: the pro indiviso property used in the parcel system —created by Law 135 of 1961—, to allocate land to peasants under a collective scheme. Based on the experience of five large estates allocated in p...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidad de los Andes (Bogotá)
2020-07-01
|
Series: | Antípoda: Revista de Antropología y Arqueología |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://revistas.uniandes.edu.co/doi/full/10.7440/antipoda40.2020.02 |
id |
doaj-1a901d2299114c86b31da38b1c449cd2 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-1a901d2299114c86b31da38b1c449cd22020-11-25T02:35:48ZengUniversidad de los Andes (Bogotá)Antípoda: Revista de Antropología y Arqueología1900-54072011-42732020-07-0140295110.7440/antipoda40.2020.02Indivisos, esquema colectivo y prácticas de propiedad campesina en ColombiaJuana Camacho Segura0Natalia Robledo Escobar1nstituto Colombiano de Antropología e Historia (Icanh)Universidad del RosarioThis article examines an under-explored dimension of agrarian reform and peasant studies in Colombia: the pro indiviso property used in the parcel system —created by Law 135 of 1961—, to allocate land to peasants under a collective scheme. Based on the experience of five large estates allocated in pro indiviso to landless peasants in La Mojana (San Marcos, Sucre), it examines the articulation of agrarian regulations with customary property practices in a community in which there are family plots, collective properties and commons. This ethnographic research combines participatory fieldwork involving peasants, interviews with experts in agrarian law and former Incora and Incoder officials, and a review of secondary sources. The study’s findings reveal the mixed results of the collective scheme in terms of achieving the economic and social objectives proposed by the State, and in the establishment of rural property. They also question the agrarian individualism by which the peasantry has been represented. This analysis provides a novel perspective to peasant studies based on a perspective grounded in property policies and practices.https://revistas.uniandes.edu.co/doi/full/10.7440/antipoda40.2020.02agrarian reformcaribbeanpeasantsparcel systempro indivisoproperty practices |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Juana Camacho Segura Natalia Robledo Escobar |
spellingShingle |
Juana Camacho Segura Natalia Robledo Escobar Indivisos, esquema colectivo y prácticas de propiedad campesina en Colombia Antípoda: Revista de Antropología y Arqueología agrarian reform caribbean peasants parcel system pro indiviso property practices |
author_facet |
Juana Camacho Segura Natalia Robledo Escobar |
author_sort |
Juana Camacho Segura |
title |
Indivisos, esquema colectivo y prácticas de propiedad campesina en Colombia |
title_short |
Indivisos, esquema colectivo y prácticas de propiedad campesina en Colombia |
title_full |
Indivisos, esquema colectivo y prácticas de propiedad campesina en Colombia |
title_fullStr |
Indivisos, esquema colectivo y prácticas de propiedad campesina en Colombia |
title_full_unstemmed |
Indivisos, esquema colectivo y prácticas de propiedad campesina en Colombia |
title_sort |
indivisos, esquema colectivo y prácticas de propiedad campesina en colombia |
publisher |
Universidad de los Andes (Bogotá) |
series |
Antípoda: Revista de Antropología y Arqueología |
issn |
1900-5407 2011-4273 |
publishDate |
2020-07-01 |
description |
This article examines an under-explored dimension of agrarian reform and peasant studies in Colombia: the pro indiviso property used in the parcel system —created by Law 135 of 1961—, to allocate land to peasants under a collective scheme. Based on the experience of five large estates allocated in pro indiviso to landless peasants in La Mojana (San Marcos, Sucre), it examines the articulation of agrarian regulations with customary property practices in a community in which there are family plots, collective properties and commons. This ethnographic research combines participatory fieldwork involving peasants, interviews with experts in agrarian law and former Incora and Incoder officials, and a review of secondary sources. The study’s findings reveal the mixed results of the collective scheme in terms of achieving the economic and social objectives proposed by the State, and in the establishment of rural property. They also question the agrarian individualism by which the peasantry has been represented. This analysis provides a novel perspective to peasant studies based on a perspective grounded in property policies and practices. |
topic |
agrarian reform caribbean peasants parcel system pro indiviso property practices |
url |
https://revistas.uniandes.edu.co/doi/full/10.7440/antipoda40.2020.02 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT juanacamachosegura indivisosesquemacolectivoypracticasdepropiedadcampesinaencolombia AT nataliarobledoescobar indivisosesquemacolectivoypracticasdepropiedadcampesinaencolombia |
_version_ |
1724803331423993856 |