Acute Effects of Continuous and Intermittent Blood Flow Restriction on Movement Velocity During Bench Press Exercise Against Different Loads

This study evaluated the effects of continuous and intermittent blood flow restriction (BFR) with 70% of full arterial occlusion pressure on bar velocity during the bench press exercise against a wide range of resistive loads. Eleven strength-trained males (age: 23.5 ± 1.4 years; resistance training...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michal Wilk, Mariola Gepfert, Michal Krzysztofik, Petr Stastny, Adam Zajac, Gregory C. Bogdanis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-11-01
Series:Frontiers in Physiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2020.569915/full
id doaj-1a816c627db54ecda70344fdd4611ae5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1a816c627db54ecda70344fdd4611ae52020-12-08T08:41:04ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Physiology1664-042X2020-11-011110.3389/fphys.2020.569915569915Acute Effects of Continuous and Intermittent Blood Flow Restriction on Movement Velocity During Bench Press Exercise Against Different LoadsMichal Wilk0Mariola Gepfert1Michal Krzysztofik2Petr Stastny3Adam Zajac4Gregory C. Bogdanis5Institute of Sport Sciences, Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, Katowice, PolandInstitute of Sport Sciences, Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, Katowice, PolandInstitute of Sport Sciences, Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, Katowice, PolandDepartment of Sport Games, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, Prague, CzechiaInstitute of Sport Sciences, Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, Katowice, PolandSchool of Physical Education and Sport Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GreeceThis study evaluated the effects of continuous and intermittent blood flow restriction (BFR) with 70% of full arterial occlusion pressure on bar velocity during the bench press exercise against a wide range of resistive loads. Eleven strength-trained males (age: 23.5 ± 1.4 years; resistance training experience: 2.8 ± 0.8 years, maximal bench press strength – 1RM = 101.8 ± 13.9 kg; body mass = 79.8 ± 10.4 kg), performed three different testing protocols in random and counterbalanced order: without BFR (NO-BFR); intermittent BFR (I-BFR) and continuous BFR (C-BFR). During each experimental session, subjects performed eight sets of two repetitions each, with increasing loads from 20 to 90% 1RM (10% steps), and 3 min rest between each set. In the C-BFR condition occlusion was kept throughout the trial, while in the I-BFR, occlusion was released during each 3 min rest interval. Peak bar velocity (PV) during the bench press exercise was higher by 12–17% in both I-BFR and C-BFR compared with NO-BFR only at the loads of 20, 30, 40, and 50% 1RM (p < 0.001), while performance at higher loads remained unchanged. Mean bar velocity (MV) was unaffected by occlusion (p = 0.342). These results indicate that BFR during bench press exercise increases PV and this may be used as an enhanced stimulus during explosive resistance training. At higher workloads, bench press performance was not negatively affected by BFR, indicating that the benefits of exercise under occlusion can be obtained while explosive performance is not impaired.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2020.569915/fullocclusionresistance exercisecuffpeak velocityperformance
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Michal Wilk
Mariola Gepfert
Michal Krzysztofik
Petr Stastny
Adam Zajac
Gregory C. Bogdanis
spellingShingle Michal Wilk
Mariola Gepfert
Michal Krzysztofik
Petr Stastny
Adam Zajac
Gregory C. Bogdanis
Acute Effects of Continuous and Intermittent Blood Flow Restriction on Movement Velocity During Bench Press Exercise Against Different Loads
Frontiers in Physiology
occlusion
resistance exercise
cuff
peak velocity
performance
author_facet Michal Wilk
Mariola Gepfert
Michal Krzysztofik
Petr Stastny
Adam Zajac
Gregory C. Bogdanis
author_sort Michal Wilk
title Acute Effects of Continuous and Intermittent Blood Flow Restriction on Movement Velocity During Bench Press Exercise Against Different Loads
title_short Acute Effects of Continuous and Intermittent Blood Flow Restriction on Movement Velocity During Bench Press Exercise Against Different Loads
title_full Acute Effects of Continuous and Intermittent Blood Flow Restriction on Movement Velocity During Bench Press Exercise Against Different Loads
title_fullStr Acute Effects of Continuous and Intermittent Blood Flow Restriction on Movement Velocity During Bench Press Exercise Against Different Loads
title_full_unstemmed Acute Effects of Continuous and Intermittent Blood Flow Restriction on Movement Velocity During Bench Press Exercise Against Different Loads
title_sort acute effects of continuous and intermittent blood flow restriction on movement velocity during bench press exercise against different loads
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Physiology
issn 1664-042X
publishDate 2020-11-01
description This study evaluated the effects of continuous and intermittent blood flow restriction (BFR) with 70% of full arterial occlusion pressure on bar velocity during the bench press exercise against a wide range of resistive loads. Eleven strength-trained males (age: 23.5 ± 1.4 years; resistance training experience: 2.8 ± 0.8 years, maximal bench press strength – 1RM = 101.8 ± 13.9 kg; body mass = 79.8 ± 10.4 kg), performed three different testing protocols in random and counterbalanced order: without BFR (NO-BFR); intermittent BFR (I-BFR) and continuous BFR (C-BFR). During each experimental session, subjects performed eight sets of two repetitions each, with increasing loads from 20 to 90% 1RM (10% steps), and 3 min rest between each set. In the C-BFR condition occlusion was kept throughout the trial, while in the I-BFR, occlusion was released during each 3 min rest interval. Peak bar velocity (PV) during the bench press exercise was higher by 12–17% in both I-BFR and C-BFR compared with NO-BFR only at the loads of 20, 30, 40, and 50% 1RM (p < 0.001), while performance at higher loads remained unchanged. Mean bar velocity (MV) was unaffected by occlusion (p = 0.342). These results indicate that BFR during bench press exercise increases PV and this may be used as an enhanced stimulus during explosive resistance training. At higher workloads, bench press performance was not negatively affected by BFR, indicating that the benefits of exercise under occlusion can be obtained while explosive performance is not impaired.
topic occlusion
resistance exercise
cuff
peak velocity
performance
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2020.569915/full
work_keys_str_mv AT michalwilk acuteeffectsofcontinuousandintermittentbloodflowrestrictiononmovementvelocityduringbenchpressexerciseagainstdifferentloads
AT mariolagepfert acuteeffectsofcontinuousandintermittentbloodflowrestrictiononmovementvelocityduringbenchpressexerciseagainstdifferentloads
AT michalkrzysztofik acuteeffectsofcontinuousandintermittentbloodflowrestrictiononmovementvelocityduringbenchpressexerciseagainstdifferentloads
AT petrstastny acuteeffectsofcontinuousandintermittentbloodflowrestrictiononmovementvelocityduringbenchpressexerciseagainstdifferentloads
AT adamzajac acuteeffectsofcontinuousandintermittentbloodflowrestrictiononmovementvelocityduringbenchpressexerciseagainstdifferentloads
AT gregorycbogdanis acuteeffectsofcontinuousandintermittentbloodflowrestrictiononmovementvelocityduringbenchpressexerciseagainstdifferentloads
_version_ 1724390371551608832