Acute Effects of Continuous and Intermittent Blood Flow Restriction on Movement Velocity During Bench Press Exercise Against Different Loads
This study evaluated the effects of continuous and intermittent blood flow restriction (BFR) with 70% of full arterial occlusion pressure on bar velocity during the bench press exercise against a wide range of resistive loads. Eleven strength-trained males (age: 23.5 ± 1.4 years; resistance training...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020-11-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Physiology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2020.569915/full |
id |
doaj-1a816c627db54ecda70344fdd4611ae5 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-1a816c627db54ecda70344fdd4611ae52020-12-08T08:41:04ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Physiology1664-042X2020-11-011110.3389/fphys.2020.569915569915Acute Effects of Continuous and Intermittent Blood Flow Restriction on Movement Velocity During Bench Press Exercise Against Different LoadsMichal Wilk0Mariola Gepfert1Michal Krzysztofik2Petr Stastny3Adam Zajac4Gregory C. Bogdanis5Institute of Sport Sciences, Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, Katowice, PolandInstitute of Sport Sciences, Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, Katowice, PolandInstitute of Sport Sciences, Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, Katowice, PolandDepartment of Sport Games, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, Prague, CzechiaInstitute of Sport Sciences, Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, Katowice, PolandSchool of Physical Education and Sport Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GreeceThis study evaluated the effects of continuous and intermittent blood flow restriction (BFR) with 70% of full arterial occlusion pressure on bar velocity during the bench press exercise against a wide range of resistive loads. Eleven strength-trained males (age: 23.5 ± 1.4 years; resistance training experience: 2.8 ± 0.8 years, maximal bench press strength – 1RM = 101.8 ± 13.9 kg; body mass = 79.8 ± 10.4 kg), performed three different testing protocols in random and counterbalanced order: without BFR (NO-BFR); intermittent BFR (I-BFR) and continuous BFR (C-BFR). During each experimental session, subjects performed eight sets of two repetitions each, with increasing loads from 20 to 90% 1RM (10% steps), and 3 min rest between each set. In the C-BFR condition occlusion was kept throughout the trial, while in the I-BFR, occlusion was released during each 3 min rest interval. Peak bar velocity (PV) during the bench press exercise was higher by 12–17% in both I-BFR and C-BFR compared with NO-BFR only at the loads of 20, 30, 40, and 50% 1RM (p < 0.001), while performance at higher loads remained unchanged. Mean bar velocity (MV) was unaffected by occlusion (p = 0.342). These results indicate that BFR during bench press exercise increases PV and this may be used as an enhanced stimulus during explosive resistance training. At higher workloads, bench press performance was not negatively affected by BFR, indicating that the benefits of exercise under occlusion can be obtained while explosive performance is not impaired.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2020.569915/fullocclusionresistance exercisecuffpeak velocityperformance |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Michal Wilk Mariola Gepfert Michal Krzysztofik Petr Stastny Adam Zajac Gregory C. Bogdanis |
spellingShingle |
Michal Wilk Mariola Gepfert Michal Krzysztofik Petr Stastny Adam Zajac Gregory C. Bogdanis Acute Effects of Continuous and Intermittent Blood Flow Restriction on Movement Velocity During Bench Press Exercise Against Different Loads Frontiers in Physiology occlusion resistance exercise cuff peak velocity performance |
author_facet |
Michal Wilk Mariola Gepfert Michal Krzysztofik Petr Stastny Adam Zajac Gregory C. Bogdanis |
author_sort |
Michal Wilk |
title |
Acute Effects of Continuous and Intermittent Blood Flow Restriction on Movement Velocity During Bench Press Exercise Against Different Loads |
title_short |
Acute Effects of Continuous and Intermittent Blood Flow Restriction on Movement Velocity During Bench Press Exercise Against Different Loads |
title_full |
Acute Effects of Continuous and Intermittent Blood Flow Restriction on Movement Velocity During Bench Press Exercise Against Different Loads |
title_fullStr |
Acute Effects of Continuous and Intermittent Blood Flow Restriction on Movement Velocity During Bench Press Exercise Against Different Loads |
title_full_unstemmed |
Acute Effects of Continuous and Intermittent Blood Flow Restriction on Movement Velocity During Bench Press Exercise Against Different Loads |
title_sort |
acute effects of continuous and intermittent blood flow restriction on movement velocity during bench press exercise against different loads |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Physiology |
issn |
1664-042X |
publishDate |
2020-11-01 |
description |
This study evaluated the effects of continuous and intermittent blood flow restriction (BFR) with 70% of full arterial occlusion pressure on bar velocity during the bench press exercise against a wide range of resistive loads. Eleven strength-trained males (age: 23.5 ± 1.4 years; resistance training experience: 2.8 ± 0.8 years, maximal bench press strength – 1RM = 101.8 ± 13.9 kg; body mass = 79.8 ± 10.4 kg), performed three different testing protocols in random and counterbalanced order: without BFR (NO-BFR); intermittent BFR (I-BFR) and continuous BFR (C-BFR). During each experimental session, subjects performed eight sets of two repetitions each, with increasing loads from 20 to 90% 1RM (10% steps), and 3 min rest between each set. In the C-BFR condition occlusion was kept throughout the trial, while in the I-BFR, occlusion was released during each 3 min rest interval. Peak bar velocity (PV) during the bench press exercise was higher by 12–17% in both I-BFR and C-BFR compared with NO-BFR only at the loads of 20, 30, 40, and 50% 1RM (p < 0.001), while performance at higher loads remained unchanged. Mean bar velocity (MV) was unaffected by occlusion (p = 0.342). These results indicate that BFR during bench press exercise increases PV and this may be used as an enhanced stimulus during explosive resistance training. At higher workloads, bench press performance was not negatively affected by BFR, indicating that the benefits of exercise under occlusion can be obtained while explosive performance is not impaired. |
topic |
occlusion resistance exercise cuff peak velocity performance |
url |
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2020.569915/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT michalwilk acuteeffectsofcontinuousandintermittentbloodflowrestrictiononmovementvelocityduringbenchpressexerciseagainstdifferentloads AT mariolagepfert acuteeffectsofcontinuousandintermittentbloodflowrestrictiononmovementvelocityduringbenchpressexerciseagainstdifferentloads AT michalkrzysztofik acuteeffectsofcontinuousandintermittentbloodflowrestrictiononmovementvelocityduringbenchpressexerciseagainstdifferentloads AT petrstastny acuteeffectsofcontinuousandintermittentbloodflowrestrictiononmovementvelocityduringbenchpressexerciseagainstdifferentloads AT adamzajac acuteeffectsofcontinuousandintermittentbloodflowrestrictiononmovementvelocityduringbenchpressexerciseagainstdifferentloads AT gregorycbogdanis acuteeffectsofcontinuousandintermittentbloodflowrestrictiononmovementvelocityduringbenchpressexerciseagainstdifferentloads |
_version_ |
1724390371551608832 |