Business Strategy, State-Owned Equity and Cost Stickiness: Evidence from Chinese Firms

This paper investigates the relationship between business strategy and cost stickiness under different ownership. Using the data from listed firms in China from 2002 to 2015, we find that first, firms with different strategies exhibit different cost behavior. The cost stickiness of choosing a differ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tingyong Zhong, Fangcheng Sun, Haiyan Zhou, Jeoung Yul Lee
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-03-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/5/1850
id doaj-1a808f35c8c34355bfe51e265096e878
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1a808f35c8c34355bfe51e265096e8782020-11-25T02:51:11ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502020-03-01125185010.3390/su12051850su12051850Business Strategy, State-Owned Equity and Cost Stickiness: Evidence from Chinese FirmsTingyong Zhong0Fangcheng Sun1Haiyan Zhou2Jeoung Yul Lee3School of Accountancy, Chongqing Technology and Business University, Chongqing 400067, ChinaSchool of Accountancy, Chongqing Technology and Business University, Chongqing 400067, ChinaRobert Vackar College of Business and Entrepreneurship, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Edinburg 78539, TX, USANational Research Base of Intelligent Manufacturing Service, Chongqing Technology and Business University, Chongqing 400067, ChinaThis paper investigates the relationship between business strategy and cost stickiness under different ownership. Using the data from listed firms in China from 2002 to 2015, we find that first, firms with different strategies exhibit different cost behavior. The cost stickiness of choosing a differentiation strategy is higher than that of choosing a low-cost strategy. Second, management expectations will affect cost stickiness. Optimistic expectations will increase cost stickiness, while pessimistic expectations will reduce cost stickiness. Third, management expectations can adjust the relationship between business strategy and cost stickiness in terms of government-created advantages (GCAs). If management expectations tend to be optimistic, the cost stickiness is higher with a differentiation strategy than with a low-cost strategy. If management expectations tend to be pessimistic, then cost stickiness is higher with a low-cost strategy than with a differentiation strategy. Finally, the state-owned equity affects the extent of the effect of a differentiation strategy on cost stickiness. State-owned firms, which receive more GCAs than non-state-owned firms, have stronger cost stickiness than non-state-owned firms, even if both categories of firms use more differentiation strategy.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/5/1850business strategycost stickinessstate-owned firmsinstitutional advantages
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tingyong Zhong
Fangcheng Sun
Haiyan Zhou
Jeoung Yul Lee
spellingShingle Tingyong Zhong
Fangcheng Sun
Haiyan Zhou
Jeoung Yul Lee
Business Strategy, State-Owned Equity and Cost Stickiness: Evidence from Chinese Firms
Sustainability
business strategy
cost stickiness
state-owned firms
institutional advantages
author_facet Tingyong Zhong
Fangcheng Sun
Haiyan Zhou
Jeoung Yul Lee
author_sort Tingyong Zhong
title Business Strategy, State-Owned Equity and Cost Stickiness: Evidence from Chinese Firms
title_short Business Strategy, State-Owned Equity and Cost Stickiness: Evidence from Chinese Firms
title_full Business Strategy, State-Owned Equity and Cost Stickiness: Evidence from Chinese Firms
title_fullStr Business Strategy, State-Owned Equity and Cost Stickiness: Evidence from Chinese Firms
title_full_unstemmed Business Strategy, State-Owned Equity and Cost Stickiness: Evidence from Chinese Firms
title_sort business strategy, state-owned equity and cost stickiness: evidence from chinese firms
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2020-03-01
description This paper investigates the relationship between business strategy and cost stickiness under different ownership. Using the data from listed firms in China from 2002 to 2015, we find that first, firms with different strategies exhibit different cost behavior. The cost stickiness of choosing a differentiation strategy is higher than that of choosing a low-cost strategy. Second, management expectations will affect cost stickiness. Optimistic expectations will increase cost stickiness, while pessimistic expectations will reduce cost stickiness. Third, management expectations can adjust the relationship between business strategy and cost stickiness in terms of government-created advantages (GCAs). If management expectations tend to be optimistic, the cost stickiness is higher with a differentiation strategy than with a low-cost strategy. If management expectations tend to be pessimistic, then cost stickiness is higher with a low-cost strategy than with a differentiation strategy. Finally, the state-owned equity affects the extent of the effect of a differentiation strategy on cost stickiness. State-owned firms, which receive more GCAs than non-state-owned firms, have stronger cost stickiness than non-state-owned firms, even if both categories of firms use more differentiation strategy.
topic business strategy
cost stickiness
state-owned firms
institutional advantages
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/5/1850
work_keys_str_mv AT tingyongzhong businessstrategystateownedequityandcoststickinessevidencefromchinesefirms
AT fangchengsun businessstrategystateownedequityandcoststickinessevidencefromchinesefirms
AT haiyanzhou businessstrategystateownedequityandcoststickinessevidencefromchinesefirms
AT jeoungyullee businessstrategystateownedequityandcoststickinessevidencefromchinesefirms
_version_ 1724735776621592576