Effects of bilateral Pecto-intercostal Fascial Block for perioperative pain management in patients undergoing open cardiac surgery: a prospective randomized study

Abstract Background Open cardiac surgical patients may experience severe acute poststernotomy pain. The ultrasound-guided Pecto-intercostal Fascial Block (PIFB) can cover anterior branches of intercostal nerves from T2 to T6. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of bilateral PIFB in p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yang Zhang, Haixia Gong, Biming Zhan, Shibiao Chen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-06-01
Series:BMC Anesthesiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01391-w
id doaj-1a320013fbc24a1d9d08805d0875a9af
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1a320013fbc24a1d9d08805d0875a9af2021-06-27T11:28:39ZengBMCBMC Anesthesiology1471-22532021-06-012111810.1186/s12871-021-01391-wEffects of bilateral Pecto-intercostal Fascial Block for perioperative pain management in patients undergoing open cardiac surgery: a prospective randomized studyYang Zhang0Haixia Gong1Biming Zhan2Shibiao Chen3Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang UniversityDepartment of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang UniversityDepartment of cardiology, The second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang UniversityDepartment of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang UniversityAbstract Background Open cardiac surgical patients may experience severe acute poststernotomy pain. The ultrasound-guided Pecto-intercostal Fascial Block (PIFB) can cover anterior branches of intercostal nerves from T2 to T6. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of bilateral PIFB in patients undergoing open cardiac surgery. Methods A group of 108 patients were randomly allocated to either receive bilateral PIFB (PIFB group) or no nerve block (SALI group). The primary endpoint was postoperative pain. The secondary outcome measures included intraoperative and postoperative sufentanil and parecoxib consumption, time to extubation, time to first feces, length of stay in the ICU and the length of hospital stay. Insulin, glucose, insulin resistance and interleukin (IL)-6 at 1, 2, 3 days after surgery were mearsured. The homeostasis model assessment (HOMA-IR) was used to measure perioperative insulin resistance. Results The PIFB group reported significantly less sufentanil and parecoxib consumption than the SALI group. Compared to the PIFB group, the SALI group had higher Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores at 24 h after operation both at rest and during coughing. The time to extubation, length of stay in the ICU and length of hospital stay were significantly decreased in the PIFB group compared with the SALI group. The PIFB group had a lower insulin, glucose, IL-6, HOMA-IR level than the SALI group 3 days after surgery. Conclusion Bilateral PIFB provides effective analgesia and accelerates recovery in patients undergoing open cardiac surgery. Trial registration This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ( ChiCTR 2000030609 ) on 08/03/2020.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01391-wPecto-intercostal Fascial BlockInsulin resistanceThe length of hospital staySufentanilOpen cardiac surgery
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yang Zhang
Haixia Gong
Biming Zhan
Shibiao Chen
spellingShingle Yang Zhang
Haixia Gong
Biming Zhan
Shibiao Chen
Effects of bilateral Pecto-intercostal Fascial Block for perioperative pain management in patients undergoing open cardiac surgery: a prospective randomized study
BMC Anesthesiology
Pecto-intercostal Fascial Block
Insulin resistance
The length of hospital stay
Sufentanil
Open cardiac surgery
author_facet Yang Zhang
Haixia Gong
Biming Zhan
Shibiao Chen
author_sort Yang Zhang
title Effects of bilateral Pecto-intercostal Fascial Block for perioperative pain management in patients undergoing open cardiac surgery: a prospective randomized study
title_short Effects of bilateral Pecto-intercostal Fascial Block for perioperative pain management in patients undergoing open cardiac surgery: a prospective randomized study
title_full Effects of bilateral Pecto-intercostal Fascial Block for perioperative pain management in patients undergoing open cardiac surgery: a prospective randomized study
title_fullStr Effects of bilateral Pecto-intercostal Fascial Block for perioperative pain management in patients undergoing open cardiac surgery: a prospective randomized study
title_full_unstemmed Effects of bilateral Pecto-intercostal Fascial Block for perioperative pain management in patients undergoing open cardiac surgery: a prospective randomized study
title_sort effects of bilateral pecto-intercostal fascial block for perioperative pain management in patients undergoing open cardiac surgery: a prospective randomized study
publisher BMC
series BMC Anesthesiology
issn 1471-2253
publishDate 2021-06-01
description Abstract Background Open cardiac surgical patients may experience severe acute poststernotomy pain. The ultrasound-guided Pecto-intercostal Fascial Block (PIFB) can cover anterior branches of intercostal nerves from T2 to T6. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of bilateral PIFB in patients undergoing open cardiac surgery. Methods A group of 108 patients were randomly allocated to either receive bilateral PIFB (PIFB group) or no nerve block (SALI group). The primary endpoint was postoperative pain. The secondary outcome measures included intraoperative and postoperative sufentanil and parecoxib consumption, time to extubation, time to first feces, length of stay in the ICU and the length of hospital stay. Insulin, glucose, insulin resistance and interleukin (IL)-6 at 1, 2, 3 days after surgery were mearsured. The homeostasis model assessment (HOMA-IR) was used to measure perioperative insulin resistance. Results The PIFB group reported significantly less sufentanil and parecoxib consumption than the SALI group. Compared to the PIFB group, the SALI group had higher Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores at 24 h after operation both at rest and during coughing. The time to extubation, length of stay in the ICU and length of hospital stay were significantly decreased in the PIFB group compared with the SALI group. The PIFB group had a lower insulin, glucose, IL-6, HOMA-IR level than the SALI group 3 days after surgery. Conclusion Bilateral PIFB provides effective analgesia and accelerates recovery in patients undergoing open cardiac surgery. Trial registration This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ( ChiCTR 2000030609 ) on 08/03/2020.
topic Pecto-intercostal Fascial Block
Insulin resistance
The length of hospital stay
Sufentanil
Open cardiac surgery
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01391-w
work_keys_str_mv AT yangzhang effectsofbilateralpectointercostalfascialblockforperioperativepainmanagementinpatientsundergoingopencardiacsurgeryaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT haixiagong effectsofbilateralpectointercostalfascialblockforperioperativepainmanagementinpatientsundergoingopencardiacsurgeryaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT bimingzhan effectsofbilateralpectointercostalfascialblockforperioperativepainmanagementinpatientsundergoingopencardiacsurgeryaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT shibiaochen effectsofbilateralpectointercostalfascialblockforperioperativepainmanagementinpatientsundergoingopencardiacsurgeryaprospectiverandomizedstudy
_version_ 1721357730782904320