Economic Assessment of an Integrated Membrane System for Secondary Effluent Polishing for Unrestricted Reuse

Extra treatment stages are required to polish the secondary effluent for unrestricted reuse, primarily for agricultural irrigation. Improved technology for the removal of particles, turbidity, bacteria and cysts, without the use of disinfectants is based on MicroFiltration (MF) and UltraFiltration (...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gideon Oron, Amos Bick, Leonid Gillerman, Yossi Manor
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2012-03-01
Series:Water
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/4/1/219/
id doaj-1a140b38e7c34a40a3dce74de6e4a8fe
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1a140b38e7c34a40a3dce74de6e4a8fe2020-11-25T00:56:36ZengMDPI AGWater2073-44412012-03-014121923610.3390/w4010219Economic Assessment of an Integrated Membrane System for Secondary Effluent Polishing for Unrestricted ReuseGideon OronAmos BickLeonid GillermanYossi ManorExtra treatment stages are required to polish the secondary effluent for unrestricted reuse, primarily for agricultural irrigation. Improved technology for the removal of particles, turbidity, bacteria and cysts, without the use of disinfectants is based on MicroFiltration (MF) and UltraFiltration (UF) membrane technology and in series with Reverse Osmosis (RO) for dissolved solids removal. Field experiments were conducted using a mobile UF and RO membrane pilot unit at a capacity of around 1.0 m3/hr. A management model was defined and tested towards optimal polishing of secondary effluent. The two major purposes of the management model are: (i) to delineate a methodology for economic assessment of optimal membrane technology implementation for secondary effluent upgrading for unrestricted use, and; (ii) to provide guidelines for optimal RO membrane selection in regards to the pretreatment stage. The defined linear model takes into account the costs of the feed secondary effluent, the UF pretreatment and the RO process. Technological constraints refer primarily to the longevity of the membrane and their performance. Final treatment cost (the objective function) includes investment, operation and maintenance expenses, UF pretreatment, RO treatment, post treatment and incentive for low salinity permeate use. The cost range of water for irrigation according to the model is between 15 and 42 US cents per m3.http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/4/1/219/effluentmembranesoptimizationrenovationreverse-osmosismanagement modeling
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gideon Oron
Amos Bick
Leonid Gillerman
Yossi Manor
spellingShingle Gideon Oron
Amos Bick
Leonid Gillerman
Yossi Manor
Economic Assessment of an Integrated Membrane System for Secondary Effluent Polishing for Unrestricted Reuse
Water
effluent
membranes
optimization
renovation
reverse-osmosis
management modeling
author_facet Gideon Oron
Amos Bick
Leonid Gillerman
Yossi Manor
author_sort Gideon Oron
title Economic Assessment of an Integrated Membrane System for Secondary Effluent Polishing for Unrestricted Reuse
title_short Economic Assessment of an Integrated Membrane System for Secondary Effluent Polishing for Unrestricted Reuse
title_full Economic Assessment of an Integrated Membrane System for Secondary Effluent Polishing for Unrestricted Reuse
title_fullStr Economic Assessment of an Integrated Membrane System for Secondary Effluent Polishing for Unrestricted Reuse
title_full_unstemmed Economic Assessment of an Integrated Membrane System for Secondary Effluent Polishing for Unrestricted Reuse
title_sort economic assessment of an integrated membrane system for secondary effluent polishing for unrestricted reuse
publisher MDPI AG
series Water
issn 2073-4441
publishDate 2012-03-01
description Extra treatment stages are required to polish the secondary effluent for unrestricted reuse, primarily for agricultural irrigation. Improved technology for the removal of particles, turbidity, bacteria and cysts, without the use of disinfectants is based on MicroFiltration (MF) and UltraFiltration (UF) membrane technology and in series with Reverse Osmosis (RO) for dissolved solids removal. Field experiments were conducted using a mobile UF and RO membrane pilot unit at a capacity of around 1.0 m3/hr. A management model was defined and tested towards optimal polishing of secondary effluent. The two major purposes of the management model are: (i) to delineate a methodology for economic assessment of optimal membrane technology implementation for secondary effluent upgrading for unrestricted use, and; (ii) to provide guidelines for optimal RO membrane selection in regards to the pretreatment stage. The defined linear model takes into account the costs of the feed secondary effluent, the UF pretreatment and the RO process. Technological constraints refer primarily to the longevity of the membrane and their performance. Final treatment cost (the objective function) includes investment, operation and maintenance expenses, UF pretreatment, RO treatment, post treatment and incentive for low salinity permeate use. The cost range of water for irrigation according to the model is between 15 and 42 US cents per m3.
topic effluent
membranes
optimization
renovation
reverse-osmosis
management modeling
url http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/4/1/219/
work_keys_str_mv AT gideonoron economicassessmentofanintegratedmembranesystemforsecondaryeffluentpolishingforunrestrictedreuse
AT amosbick economicassessmentofanintegratedmembranesystemforsecondaryeffluentpolishingforunrestrictedreuse
AT leonidgillerman economicassessmentofanintegratedmembranesystemforsecondaryeffluentpolishingforunrestrictedreuse
AT yossimanor economicassessmentofanintegratedmembranesystemforsecondaryeffluentpolishingforunrestrictedreuse
_version_ 1725226329973981184