Economic Assessment of an Integrated Membrane System for Secondary Effluent Polishing for Unrestricted Reuse
Extra treatment stages are required to polish the secondary effluent for unrestricted reuse, primarily for agricultural irrigation. Improved technology for the removal of particles, turbidity, bacteria and cysts, without the use of disinfectants is based on MicroFiltration (MF) and UltraFiltration (...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2012-03-01
|
Series: | Water |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/4/1/219/ |
id |
doaj-1a140b38e7c34a40a3dce74de6e4a8fe |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-1a140b38e7c34a40a3dce74de6e4a8fe2020-11-25T00:56:36ZengMDPI AGWater2073-44412012-03-014121923610.3390/w4010219Economic Assessment of an Integrated Membrane System for Secondary Effluent Polishing for Unrestricted ReuseGideon OronAmos BickLeonid GillermanYossi ManorExtra treatment stages are required to polish the secondary effluent for unrestricted reuse, primarily for agricultural irrigation. Improved technology for the removal of particles, turbidity, bacteria and cysts, without the use of disinfectants is based on MicroFiltration (MF) and UltraFiltration (UF) membrane technology and in series with Reverse Osmosis (RO) for dissolved solids removal. Field experiments were conducted using a mobile UF and RO membrane pilot unit at a capacity of around 1.0 m3/hr. A management model was defined and tested towards optimal polishing of secondary effluent. The two major purposes of the management model are: (i) to delineate a methodology for economic assessment of optimal membrane technology implementation for secondary effluent upgrading for unrestricted use, and; (ii) to provide guidelines for optimal RO membrane selection in regards to the pretreatment stage. The defined linear model takes into account the costs of the feed secondary effluent, the UF pretreatment and the RO process. Technological constraints refer primarily to the longevity of the membrane and their performance. Final treatment cost (the objective function) includes investment, operation and maintenance expenses, UF pretreatment, RO treatment, post treatment and incentive for low salinity permeate use. The cost range of water for irrigation according to the model is between 15 and 42 US cents per m3.http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/4/1/219/effluentmembranesoptimizationrenovationreverse-osmosismanagement modeling |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Gideon Oron Amos Bick Leonid Gillerman Yossi Manor |
spellingShingle |
Gideon Oron Amos Bick Leonid Gillerman Yossi Manor Economic Assessment of an Integrated Membrane System for Secondary Effluent Polishing for Unrestricted Reuse Water effluent membranes optimization renovation reverse-osmosis management modeling |
author_facet |
Gideon Oron Amos Bick Leonid Gillerman Yossi Manor |
author_sort |
Gideon Oron |
title |
Economic Assessment of an Integrated Membrane System for Secondary Effluent Polishing for Unrestricted Reuse |
title_short |
Economic Assessment of an Integrated Membrane System for Secondary Effluent Polishing for Unrestricted Reuse |
title_full |
Economic Assessment of an Integrated Membrane System for Secondary Effluent Polishing for Unrestricted Reuse |
title_fullStr |
Economic Assessment of an Integrated Membrane System for Secondary Effluent Polishing for Unrestricted Reuse |
title_full_unstemmed |
Economic Assessment of an Integrated Membrane System for Secondary Effluent Polishing for Unrestricted Reuse |
title_sort |
economic assessment of an integrated membrane system for secondary effluent polishing for unrestricted reuse |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Water |
issn |
2073-4441 |
publishDate |
2012-03-01 |
description |
Extra treatment stages are required to polish the secondary effluent for unrestricted reuse, primarily for agricultural irrigation. Improved technology for the removal of particles, turbidity, bacteria and cysts, without the use of disinfectants is based on MicroFiltration (MF) and UltraFiltration (UF) membrane technology and in series with Reverse Osmosis (RO) for dissolved solids removal. Field experiments were conducted using a mobile UF and RO membrane pilot unit at a capacity of around 1.0 m3/hr. A management model was defined and tested towards optimal polishing of secondary effluent. The two major purposes of the management model are: (i) to delineate a methodology for economic assessment of optimal membrane technology implementation for secondary effluent upgrading for unrestricted use, and; (ii) to provide guidelines for optimal RO membrane selection in regards to the pretreatment stage. The defined linear model takes into account the costs of the feed secondary effluent, the UF pretreatment and the RO process. Technological constraints refer primarily to the longevity of the membrane and their performance. Final treatment cost (the objective function) includes investment, operation and maintenance expenses, UF pretreatment, RO treatment, post treatment and incentive for low salinity permeate use. The cost range of water for irrigation according to the model is between 15 and 42 US cents per m3. |
topic |
effluent membranes optimization renovation reverse-osmosis management modeling |
url |
http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/4/1/219/ |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT gideonoron economicassessmentofanintegratedmembranesystemforsecondaryeffluentpolishingforunrestrictedreuse AT amosbick economicassessmentofanintegratedmembranesystemforsecondaryeffluentpolishingforunrestrictedreuse AT leonidgillerman economicassessmentofanintegratedmembranesystemforsecondaryeffluentpolishingforunrestrictedreuse AT yossimanor economicassessmentofanintegratedmembranesystemforsecondaryeffluentpolishingforunrestrictedreuse |
_version_ |
1725226329973981184 |