COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVE PROPULSION SYSTEMS - A CASE STUDY OF A PASSENGER SHIP USED IN PUBLIC TRANSPORT

The unique feature of river transport is given by the rivers' flow and the changing cross-sections of the riverbed. Most river vessels operate with a conventional propulsion system. Engine power should be scaled to the maximum expected power demand, which means that the engine is forced to run...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Roland Zalacko, Máté Zöldy, Győző Simongáti
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture 2021-01-01
Series:Brodogradnja
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/374802
id doaj-19eb92008b6f47a2ab0065a645e33ff9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-19eb92008b6f47a2ab0065a645e33ff92021-08-24T06:42:48ZengFaculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval ArchitectureBrodogradnja0007-215X1845-58592021-01-0172211810.21278/brod72201270COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVE PROPULSION SYSTEMS - A CASE STUDY OF A PASSENGER SHIP USED IN PUBLIC TRANSPORTRoland Zalacko0Máté Zöldy1Győző Simongáti2Dept. of Aeronautics, Naval Architecture and Railway Vehicles Budapest University of Technology and Economics Budapest, HungaryDept. of Automotive Technologies Budapest University of Technology and Economics Budapest, HungaryDept. of Aeronautics, Naval Architecture and Railway Vehicles Budapest University of Technology and Economics Budapest, HungaryThe unique feature of river transport is given by the rivers' flow and the changing cross-sections of the riverbed. Most river vessels operate with a conventional propulsion system. Engine power should be scaled to the maximum expected power demand, which means that the engine is forced to run at medium or low load, almost always downstream and upstream for part of the operating time. In these cases, the engine's operating point is far from ideal, so there is an increase in specific fuel consumption. This is especially true for ships that are forced to stop and start frequently. An example for the circumstances mentioned above is the BKV-100 type ship operated at Budapest as a public transport vessel. A measurement on a schedule route revealed that with given environmental conditions (water level, river flow rate, etc.), the power installed in the vessel is almost double the maximum power demand measured. Due to this reason and to the differences in power demand of downstream and upstream, it may be technically worthwhile to replace the existing conventional propulsion system with an alternative propulsion system. Based on the measurements, in this paper the authors compare 4 alternative drive systems to the existing one with regards to fuel consumption and the investment costs. Beside this, a simple but effective fuel consumption estimation method and a simple cost-benefit analysis are also described.https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/374802alternative propulsion systeminland navigationoperational profilecost and fuel consumption estimation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Roland Zalacko
Máté Zöldy
Győző Simongáti
spellingShingle Roland Zalacko
Máté Zöldy
Győző Simongáti
COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVE PROPULSION SYSTEMS - A CASE STUDY OF A PASSENGER SHIP USED IN PUBLIC TRANSPORT
Brodogradnja
alternative propulsion system
inland navigation
operational profile
cost and fuel consumption estimation
author_facet Roland Zalacko
Máté Zöldy
Győző Simongáti
author_sort Roland Zalacko
title COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVE PROPULSION SYSTEMS - A CASE STUDY OF A PASSENGER SHIP USED IN PUBLIC TRANSPORT
title_short COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVE PROPULSION SYSTEMS - A CASE STUDY OF A PASSENGER SHIP USED IN PUBLIC TRANSPORT
title_full COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVE PROPULSION SYSTEMS - A CASE STUDY OF A PASSENGER SHIP USED IN PUBLIC TRANSPORT
title_fullStr COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVE PROPULSION SYSTEMS - A CASE STUDY OF A PASSENGER SHIP USED IN PUBLIC TRANSPORT
title_full_unstemmed COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVE PROPULSION SYSTEMS - A CASE STUDY OF A PASSENGER SHIP USED IN PUBLIC TRANSPORT
title_sort comparison of alternative propulsion systems - a case study of a passenger ship used in public transport
publisher Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture
series Brodogradnja
issn 0007-215X
1845-5859
publishDate 2021-01-01
description The unique feature of river transport is given by the rivers' flow and the changing cross-sections of the riverbed. Most river vessels operate with a conventional propulsion system. Engine power should be scaled to the maximum expected power demand, which means that the engine is forced to run at medium or low load, almost always downstream and upstream for part of the operating time. In these cases, the engine's operating point is far from ideal, so there is an increase in specific fuel consumption. This is especially true for ships that are forced to stop and start frequently. An example for the circumstances mentioned above is the BKV-100 type ship operated at Budapest as a public transport vessel. A measurement on a schedule route revealed that with given environmental conditions (water level, river flow rate, etc.), the power installed in the vessel is almost double the maximum power demand measured. Due to this reason and to the differences in power demand of downstream and upstream, it may be technically worthwhile to replace the existing conventional propulsion system with an alternative propulsion system. Based on the measurements, in this paper the authors compare 4 alternative drive systems to the existing one with regards to fuel consumption and the investment costs. Beside this, a simple but effective fuel consumption estimation method and a simple cost-benefit analysis are also described.
topic alternative propulsion system
inland navigation
operational profile
cost and fuel consumption estimation
url https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/374802
work_keys_str_mv AT rolandzalacko comparisonofalternativepropulsionsystemsacasestudyofapassengershipusedinpublictransport
AT matezoldy comparisonofalternativepropulsionsystemsacasestudyofapassengershipusedinpublictransport
AT gyozosimongati comparisonofalternativepropulsionsystemsacasestudyofapassengershipusedinpublictransport
_version_ 1721197785466798080