Review of fixation techniques for the four-part fractured proximal humerus in hemiarthroplasty

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Introduction</p> <p>The clinical outcome of hemiarthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures is not satisfactory. Secondary fragment dislocation may prevent bone integration; the primary stability by a fixation technique is therefore needed to accompli...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lorenzetti Silvio, Mathys Robert, Nolan Betsy M, Baumgartner Daniel, Stüssi Edgar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2011-07-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Online Access:http://www.josr-online.com/content/6/1/36
id doaj-19e8f2a5d522439088610a135b772faf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-19e8f2a5d522439088610a135b772faf2020-11-24T21:23:49ZengBMCJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research1749-799X2011-07-01613610.1186/1749-799X-6-36Review of fixation techniques for the four-part fractured proximal humerus in hemiarthroplastyLorenzetti SilvioMathys RobertNolan Betsy MBaumgartner DanielStüssi Edgar<p>Abstract</p> <p>Introduction</p> <p>The clinical outcome of hemiarthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures is not satisfactory. Secondary fragment dislocation may prevent bone integration; the primary stability by a fixation technique is therefore needed to accomplish tuberosity healing. Present technical comparison of surgical fixation techniques reveals the state-of-the-art approach and highlights promising techniques for enhanced stability.</p> <p>Method</p> <p>A classification of available fixation techniques for three- and four part fractures was done. The placement of sutures and cables was described on the basis of anatomical landmarks such as the rotator cuff tendon insertions, the bicipital groove and the surgical neck. Groups with similar properties were categorized.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Materials used for fragment fixation include heavy braided sutures and/or metallic cables, which are passed through drilling holes in the bone fragments. The classification resulted in four distinct groups: A: both tuberosities and shaft are fixed together by one suture, B: single tuberosities are independently connected to the shaft and among each other, C: metallic cables are used in addition to the sutures and D: the fragments are connected by short stitches, close to the fragment borderlines.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>A plurality of techniques for the reconstruction of a fractured proximal humerus is found. The categorisation into similar strategies provides a broad overview of present techniques and supports a further development of optimized techniques. Prospective studies are necessary to correlate the technique with the clinical outcome.</p> http://www.josr-online.com/content/6/1/36
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lorenzetti Silvio
Mathys Robert
Nolan Betsy M
Baumgartner Daniel
Stüssi Edgar
spellingShingle Lorenzetti Silvio
Mathys Robert
Nolan Betsy M
Baumgartner Daniel
Stüssi Edgar
Review of fixation techniques for the four-part fractured proximal humerus in hemiarthroplasty
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
author_facet Lorenzetti Silvio
Mathys Robert
Nolan Betsy M
Baumgartner Daniel
Stüssi Edgar
author_sort Lorenzetti Silvio
title Review of fixation techniques for the four-part fractured proximal humerus in hemiarthroplasty
title_short Review of fixation techniques for the four-part fractured proximal humerus in hemiarthroplasty
title_full Review of fixation techniques for the four-part fractured proximal humerus in hemiarthroplasty
title_fullStr Review of fixation techniques for the four-part fractured proximal humerus in hemiarthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed Review of fixation techniques for the four-part fractured proximal humerus in hemiarthroplasty
title_sort review of fixation techniques for the four-part fractured proximal humerus in hemiarthroplasty
publisher BMC
series Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
issn 1749-799X
publishDate 2011-07-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Introduction</p> <p>The clinical outcome of hemiarthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures is not satisfactory. Secondary fragment dislocation may prevent bone integration; the primary stability by a fixation technique is therefore needed to accomplish tuberosity healing. Present technical comparison of surgical fixation techniques reveals the state-of-the-art approach and highlights promising techniques for enhanced stability.</p> <p>Method</p> <p>A classification of available fixation techniques for three- and four part fractures was done. The placement of sutures and cables was described on the basis of anatomical landmarks such as the rotator cuff tendon insertions, the bicipital groove and the surgical neck. Groups with similar properties were categorized.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Materials used for fragment fixation include heavy braided sutures and/or metallic cables, which are passed through drilling holes in the bone fragments. The classification resulted in four distinct groups: A: both tuberosities and shaft are fixed together by one suture, B: single tuberosities are independently connected to the shaft and among each other, C: metallic cables are used in addition to the sutures and D: the fragments are connected by short stitches, close to the fragment borderlines.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>A plurality of techniques for the reconstruction of a fractured proximal humerus is found. The categorisation into similar strategies provides a broad overview of present techniques and supports a further development of optimized techniques. Prospective studies are necessary to correlate the technique with the clinical outcome.</p>
url http://www.josr-online.com/content/6/1/36
work_keys_str_mv AT lorenzettisilvio reviewoffixationtechniquesforthefourpartfracturedproximalhumerusinhemiarthroplasty
AT mathysrobert reviewoffixationtechniquesforthefourpartfracturedproximalhumerusinhemiarthroplasty
AT nolanbetsym reviewoffixationtechniquesforthefourpartfracturedproximalhumerusinhemiarthroplasty
AT baumgartnerdaniel reviewoffixationtechniquesforthefourpartfracturedproximalhumerusinhemiarthroplasty
AT stussiedgar reviewoffixationtechniquesforthefourpartfracturedproximalhumerusinhemiarthroplasty
_version_ 1725991045803540480