Does Administrative Approval Impede Low-Quality Innovation? Evidence from Chinese Manufacturing Firms

Sustainable economic development is tightly connected to substantial innovation which can be improved by reducing low-quality innovation. This paper constructs a theoretical framework to present the ultimate relationship between administrative approval and sustainability. In order to verify the rese...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Haiwei Jiang, Shiyuan Pan, Xiaomeng Ren
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-03-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/5/1910
id doaj-19d1b3277b3d4b0c92f1b5d62d593c16
record_format Article
spelling doaj-19d1b3277b3d4b0c92f1b5d62d593c162020-11-24T21:53:48ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502020-03-01125191010.3390/su12051910su12051910Does Administrative Approval Impede Low-Quality Innovation? Evidence from Chinese Manufacturing FirmsHaiwei Jiang0Shiyuan Pan1Xiaomeng Ren2School of Economics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, ChinaSchool of Economics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, ChinaChina Academy of West Region Development, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, ChinaSustainable economic development is tightly connected to substantial innovation which can be improved by reducing low-quality innovation. This paper constructs a theoretical framework to present the ultimate relationship between administrative approval and sustainability. In order to verify the research hypotheses, we define the dormant patents whose patent rights are terminated due to non-payment of renewal fees to measure the low-quality innovation of Chinese manufacturing firms. By using the merged firm-level data between 1998 and 2007 and collected information on whether a city establishes the administrative approval center (AAC), and employing a difference-in-difference (DID) approach, we identify the impacts of administrative approval and firms’ low-quality innovation. First, the results reveal that administrative approval reduces the firms’ low-quality innovation. Second, administrative approval has a smaller impact on the low-quality innovation for state-owned enterprises (SOE). Third, three mechanisms are uncovered through which administrative approval impedes low-quality innovation: enhancing market competition, changing the direction of innovation, and optimizing research and development (R&D) investment strategy.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/5/1910administrative approvallow-quality innovationdormant patentssustainable economic development
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Haiwei Jiang
Shiyuan Pan
Xiaomeng Ren
spellingShingle Haiwei Jiang
Shiyuan Pan
Xiaomeng Ren
Does Administrative Approval Impede Low-Quality Innovation? Evidence from Chinese Manufacturing Firms
Sustainability
administrative approval
low-quality innovation
dormant patents
sustainable economic development
author_facet Haiwei Jiang
Shiyuan Pan
Xiaomeng Ren
author_sort Haiwei Jiang
title Does Administrative Approval Impede Low-Quality Innovation? Evidence from Chinese Manufacturing Firms
title_short Does Administrative Approval Impede Low-Quality Innovation? Evidence from Chinese Manufacturing Firms
title_full Does Administrative Approval Impede Low-Quality Innovation? Evidence from Chinese Manufacturing Firms
title_fullStr Does Administrative Approval Impede Low-Quality Innovation? Evidence from Chinese Manufacturing Firms
title_full_unstemmed Does Administrative Approval Impede Low-Quality Innovation? Evidence from Chinese Manufacturing Firms
title_sort does administrative approval impede low-quality innovation? evidence from chinese manufacturing firms
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2020-03-01
description Sustainable economic development is tightly connected to substantial innovation which can be improved by reducing low-quality innovation. This paper constructs a theoretical framework to present the ultimate relationship between administrative approval and sustainability. In order to verify the research hypotheses, we define the dormant patents whose patent rights are terminated due to non-payment of renewal fees to measure the low-quality innovation of Chinese manufacturing firms. By using the merged firm-level data between 1998 and 2007 and collected information on whether a city establishes the administrative approval center (AAC), and employing a difference-in-difference (DID) approach, we identify the impacts of administrative approval and firms’ low-quality innovation. First, the results reveal that administrative approval reduces the firms’ low-quality innovation. Second, administrative approval has a smaller impact on the low-quality innovation for state-owned enterprises (SOE). Third, three mechanisms are uncovered through which administrative approval impedes low-quality innovation: enhancing market competition, changing the direction of innovation, and optimizing research and development (R&D) investment strategy.
topic administrative approval
low-quality innovation
dormant patents
sustainable economic development
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/5/1910
work_keys_str_mv AT haiweijiang doesadministrativeapprovalimpedelowqualityinnovationevidencefromchinesemanufacturingfirms
AT shiyuanpan doesadministrativeapprovalimpedelowqualityinnovationevidencefromchinesemanufacturingfirms
AT xiaomengren doesadministrativeapprovalimpedelowqualityinnovationevidencefromchinesemanufacturingfirms
_version_ 1725870070493609984