Argumentation, confrontation et violence verbale fulgurante
Our research has defined severe verbal abuse as built up tension characterized by directly threatening acts (such as provocation, threats, insults), and polemical violence as argumentative discourse which mobilizes indirect discursive devices, such as implicit discourse relations and irony. Yet, nei...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | fra |
| Published: |
University of Tel-Aviv
2012-04-01
|
| Series: | Argumentation et Analyse du Discours |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://journals.openedition.org/aad/1260 |
| id |
doaj-19cfeeedb4d34bdcb235ebcf5356cfb4 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
Article |
| spelling |
doaj-19cfeeedb4d34bdcb235ebcf5356cfb42020-11-25T00:36:29ZfraUniversity of Tel-AvivArgumentation et Analyse du Discours1565-89612012-04-01810.4000/aad.1260Argumentation, confrontation et violence verbale fulguranteClaudine MoïseOur research has defined severe verbal abuse as built up tension characterized by directly threatening acts (such as provocation, threats, insults), and polemical violence as argumentative discourse which mobilizes indirect discursive devices, such as implicit discourse relations and irony. Yet, neither type of discourse can be considered to be impervious to mutual influence. Based on the content of an educational DVD featuring acted out scenes of daily verbal abuse taking place in public and institutional spaces (i.e., checks, summons, fines), we will show how specific argumentative devices, which we will describe, are very efficiently used within interactions that are characterised by severe abuse, with the aim of destabilizing and taking control over somebody.http://journals.openedition.org/aad/1260built up tensioncompromiseironypathosstorytellingverbal abuse |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
fra |
| format |
Article |
| sources |
DOAJ |
| author |
Claudine Moïse |
| spellingShingle |
Claudine Moïse Argumentation, confrontation et violence verbale fulgurante Argumentation et Analyse du Discours built up tension compromise irony pathos storytelling verbal abuse |
| author_facet |
Claudine Moïse |
| author_sort |
Claudine Moïse |
| title |
Argumentation, confrontation et violence verbale fulgurante |
| title_short |
Argumentation, confrontation et violence verbale fulgurante |
| title_full |
Argumentation, confrontation et violence verbale fulgurante |
| title_fullStr |
Argumentation, confrontation et violence verbale fulgurante |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Argumentation, confrontation et violence verbale fulgurante |
| title_sort |
argumentation, confrontation et violence verbale fulgurante |
| publisher |
University of Tel-Aviv |
| series |
Argumentation et Analyse du Discours |
| issn |
1565-8961 |
| publishDate |
2012-04-01 |
| description |
Our research has defined severe verbal abuse as built up tension characterized by directly threatening acts (such as provocation, threats, insults), and polemical violence as argumentative discourse which mobilizes indirect discursive devices, such as implicit discourse relations and irony. Yet, neither type of discourse can be considered to be impervious to mutual influence. Based on the content of an educational DVD featuring acted out scenes of daily verbal abuse taking place in public and institutional spaces (i.e., checks, summons, fines), we will show how specific argumentative devices, which we will describe, are very efficiently used within interactions that are characterised by severe abuse, with the aim of destabilizing and taking control over somebody. |
| topic |
built up tension compromise irony pathos storytelling verbal abuse |
| url |
http://journals.openedition.org/aad/1260 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT claudinemoise argumentationconfrontationetviolenceverbalefulgurante |
| _version_ |
1725305043590053888 |