Assessing a domain-specific risk-taking construct: A meta-analysis of reliability of the DOSPERT scale

The DOSPERT scale has been used extensively to understand individual differences in risk attitudes across varying decision domains since 2002. The present study reports a reliability generalization meta-analysis to summarize the internal consistency of both the initial and the revised versions of DO...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yiyun Shou, Joel Olney
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Society for Judgment and Decision Making 2020-01-01
Series:Judgment and Decision Making
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.sjdm.org/19/190621c/jdm190621c.pdf
id doaj-19b9bffd8a784494aaf0826b1462c52f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-19b9bffd8a784494aaf0826b1462c52f2021-05-02T16:09:49ZengSociety for Judgment and Decision MakingJudgment and Decision Making1930-29752020-01-01151112134Assessing a domain-specific risk-taking construct: A meta-analysis of reliability of the DOSPERT scaleYiyun ShouJoel OlneyThe DOSPERT scale has been used extensively to understand individual differences in risk attitudes across varying decision domains since 2002. The present study reports a reliability generalization meta-analysis to summarize the internal consistency of both the initial and the revised versions of DOSPERT. It also examined factors that can influence the reliability of the DOSPERT and its subscales. A total of 104 samples (N = 30,109) that reported 465 coefficient alphas were analyzed. Results of meta-regression models showed that the overall coefficient alpha of the DOSPERT total scores was satisfactory, regardless of the scale and study characteristics. Coefficient alphas varied significantly across domain subscales, with values ranging from .68 for the social domain to .80 for the recreational domain. In addition, the alpha coefficients of subscales varied significantly depending on various study characteristics. Finally, we report the meta-analysis of the intercorrelations among DOSPERT subscales and reveal that intercorrelations among the subscales are heterogeneous. We discuss the theoretical implications of the present findings.http://journal.sjdm.org/19/190621c/jdm190621c.pdfrisk attitudes domain specific risk taking scale meta-analysis reliability generalizationnakeywords
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yiyun Shou
Joel Olney
spellingShingle Yiyun Shou
Joel Olney
Assessing a domain-specific risk-taking construct: A meta-analysis of reliability of the DOSPERT scale
Judgment and Decision Making
risk attitudes
domain specific risk taking scale
meta-analysis
reliability generalizationnakeywords
author_facet Yiyun Shou
Joel Olney
author_sort Yiyun Shou
title Assessing a domain-specific risk-taking construct: A meta-analysis of reliability of the DOSPERT scale
title_short Assessing a domain-specific risk-taking construct: A meta-analysis of reliability of the DOSPERT scale
title_full Assessing a domain-specific risk-taking construct: A meta-analysis of reliability of the DOSPERT scale
title_fullStr Assessing a domain-specific risk-taking construct: A meta-analysis of reliability of the DOSPERT scale
title_full_unstemmed Assessing a domain-specific risk-taking construct: A meta-analysis of reliability of the DOSPERT scale
title_sort assessing a domain-specific risk-taking construct: a meta-analysis of reliability of the dospert scale
publisher Society for Judgment and Decision Making
series Judgment and Decision Making
issn 1930-2975
publishDate 2020-01-01
description The DOSPERT scale has been used extensively to understand individual differences in risk attitudes across varying decision domains since 2002. The present study reports a reliability generalization meta-analysis to summarize the internal consistency of both the initial and the revised versions of DOSPERT. It also examined factors that can influence the reliability of the DOSPERT and its subscales. A total of 104 samples (N = 30,109) that reported 465 coefficient alphas were analyzed. Results of meta-regression models showed that the overall coefficient alpha of the DOSPERT total scores was satisfactory, regardless of the scale and study characteristics. Coefficient alphas varied significantly across domain subscales, with values ranging from .68 for the social domain to .80 for the recreational domain. In addition, the alpha coefficients of subscales varied significantly depending on various study characteristics. Finally, we report the meta-analysis of the intercorrelations among DOSPERT subscales and reveal that intercorrelations among the subscales are heterogeneous. We discuss the theoretical implications of the present findings.
topic risk attitudes
domain specific risk taking scale
meta-analysis
reliability generalizationnakeywords
url http://journal.sjdm.org/19/190621c/jdm190621c.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT yiyunshou assessingadomainspecificrisktakingconstructametaanalysisofreliabilityofthedospertscale
AT joelolney assessingadomainspecificrisktakingconstructametaanalysisofreliabilityofthedospertscale
_version_ 1721490032677617664