Assessing a domain-specific risk-taking construct: A meta-analysis of reliability of the DOSPERT scale
The DOSPERT scale has been used extensively to understand individual differences in risk attitudes across varying decision domains since 2002. The present study reports a reliability generalization meta-analysis to summarize the internal consistency of both the initial and the revised versions of DO...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Society for Judgment and Decision Making
2020-01-01
|
Series: | Judgment and Decision Making |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.sjdm.org/19/190621c/jdm190621c.pdf |
id |
doaj-19b9bffd8a784494aaf0826b1462c52f |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-19b9bffd8a784494aaf0826b1462c52f2021-05-02T16:09:49ZengSociety for Judgment and Decision MakingJudgment and Decision Making1930-29752020-01-01151112134Assessing a domain-specific risk-taking construct: A meta-analysis of reliability of the DOSPERT scaleYiyun ShouJoel OlneyThe DOSPERT scale has been used extensively to understand individual differences in risk attitudes across varying decision domains since 2002. The present study reports a reliability generalization meta-analysis to summarize the internal consistency of both the initial and the revised versions of DOSPERT. It also examined factors that can influence the reliability of the DOSPERT and its subscales. A total of 104 samples (N = 30,109) that reported 465 coefficient alphas were analyzed. Results of meta-regression models showed that the overall coefficient alpha of the DOSPERT total scores was satisfactory, regardless of the scale and study characteristics. Coefficient alphas varied significantly across domain subscales, with values ranging from .68 for the social domain to .80 for the recreational domain. In addition, the alpha coefficients of subscales varied significantly depending on various study characteristics. Finally, we report the meta-analysis of the intercorrelations among DOSPERT subscales and reveal that intercorrelations among the subscales are heterogeneous. We discuss the theoretical implications of the present findings.http://journal.sjdm.org/19/190621c/jdm190621c.pdfrisk attitudes domain specific risk taking scale meta-analysis reliability generalizationnakeywords |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Yiyun Shou Joel Olney |
spellingShingle |
Yiyun Shou Joel Olney Assessing a domain-specific risk-taking construct: A meta-analysis of reliability of the DOSPERT scale Judgment and Decision Making risk attitudes domain specific risk taking scale meta-analysis reliability generalizationnakeywords |
author_facet |
Yiyun Shou Joel Olney |
author_sort |
Yiyun Shou |
title |
Assessing a
domain-specific risk-taking construct: A meta-analysis of reliability of the
DOSPERT scale |
title_short |
Assessing a
domain-specific risk-taking construct: A meta-analysis of reliability of the
DOSPERT scale |
title_full |
Assessing a
domain-specific risk-taking construct: A meta-analysis of reliability of the
DOSPERT scale |
title_fullStr |
Assessing a
domain-specific risk-taking construct: A meta-analysis of reliability of the
DOSPERT scale |
title_full_unstemmed |
Assessing a
domain-specific risk-taking construct: A meta-analysis of reliability of the
DOSPERT scale |
title_sort |
assessing a
domain-specific risk-taking construct: a meta-analysis of reliability of the
dospert scale |
publisher |
Society for Judgment and Decision Making |
series |
Judgment and Decision Making |
issn |
1930-2975 |
publishDate |
2020-01-01 |
description |
The DOSPERT scale has been used extensively to understand
individual differences in risk attitudes across varying decision domains since
2002. The present study reports a reliability generalization meta-analysis to
summarize the internal consistency of both the initial and the revised versions
of DOSPERT. It also examined factors that can influence the reliability of the
DOSPERT and its subscales. A total of 104 samples (N = 30,109) that reported
465 coefficient alphas were analyzed. Results of meta-regression models showed
that the overall coefficient alpha of the DOSPERT total scores was
satisfactory, regardless of the scale and study characteristics. Coefficient
alphas varied significantly across domain subscales, with values ranging from
.68 for the social domain to .80 for the recreational domain. In addition, the
alpha coefficients of subscales varied significantly depending on various study
characteristics. Finally, we report the meta-analysis of the intercorrelations
among DOSPERT subscales and reveal that intercorrelations among the subscales
are heterogeneous. We discuss the theoretical implications of the present
findings. |
topic |
risk attitudes domain specific risk taking scale meta-analysis reliability generalizationnakeywords |
url |
http://journal.sjdm.org/19/190621c/jdm190621c.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT yiyunshou assessingadomainspecificrisktakingconstructametaanalysisofreliabilityofthedospertscale AT joelolney assessingadomainspecificrisktakingconstructametaanalysisofreliabilityofthedospertscale |
_version_ |
1721490032677617664 |