Teaching Quality Improvement Through a Book Club

Introduction: Quality Improvement projects are an important part of residency education in the United States and are required for accreditation by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Participation in standard chart-based quality improvement had failed to generate excitement amo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Benjamin Doolittle, Jaideep Talwalkar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2015-12-01
Series:Research and Development in Medical Education
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.tbzmed.ac.ir/RDME/Manuscript/RDME-4-189.pdf
id doaj-19b0d3d564bb4b209ebe83105ece4fa1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-19b0d3d564bb4b209ebe83105ece4fa12020-11-24T23:58:12ZengTabriz University of Medical SciencesResearch and Development in Medical Education2322-27192015-12-014218919110.15171/rdme.2015.033RDME_3268_20150710075329Teaching Quality Improvement Through a Book ClubBenjamin Doolittle0Jaideep Talwalkar1MD, MDIV, Associate Professor, Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, PO BOX 8033 – Yale Station, 333 Cedar Street – 1091LMP, New Haven, CT 06520-8033Assistant Professor, Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, PO BOX 8033 – Yale Station, 333 Cedar Street – 1091LMP, New Haven, CT 06520-8033Introduction: Quality Improvement projects are an important part of residency education in the United States and are required for accreditation by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Participation in standard chart-based quality improvement had failed to generate excitement among residents in our program. The objective of our innovation was to inspire interest in quality improvement among our residents. Methods: Our residency program instituted a book discussion group. Attendance and participation of attendees was recorded, and residents were sent a follow-up survey one month after the activity to gauge their impressions. Results: Out of 16 residents in the program, 12 attended the discussion group, and all attendees participated in the discussion. The follow-up survey revealed that 10/11 (91%) of respondents had read at least part of the book and 11/11 (100%) wanted to have another book discussion group in the upcoming year. Conclusion: We believe that the use of a book discussion group can be a novel, inspiring strategy to teach quality improvement in a residency program.http://journals.tbzmed.ac.ir/RDME/Manuscript/RDME-4-189.pdfquality improvementbook clubresidency education
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Benjamin Doolittle
Jaideep Talwalkar
spellingShingle Benjamin Doolittle
Jaideep Talwalkar
Teaching Quality Improvement Through a Book Club
Research and Development in Medical Education
quality improvement
book club
residency education
author_facet Benjamin Doolittle
Jaideep Talwalkar
author_sort Benjamin Doolittle
title Teaching Quality Improvement Through a Book Club
title_short Teaching Quality Improvement Through a Book Club
title_full Teaching Quality Improvement Through a Book Club
title_fullStr Teaching Quality Improvement Through a Book Club
title_full_unstemmed Teaching Quality Improvement Through a Book Club
title_sort teaching quality improvement through a book club
publisher Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
series Research and Development in Medical Education
issn 2322-2719
publishDate 2015-12-01
description Introduction: Quality Improvement projects are an important part of residency education in the United States and are required for accreditation by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Participation in standard chart-based quality improvement had failed to generate excitement among residents in our program. The objective of our innovation was to inspire interest in quality improvement among our residents. Methods: Our residency program instituted a book discussion group. Attendance and participation of attendees was recorded, and residents were sent a follow-up survey one month after the activity to gauge their impressions. Results: Out of 16 residents in the program, 12 attended the discussion group, and all attendees participated in the discussion. The follow-up survey revealed that 10/11 (91%) of respondents had read at least part of the book and 11/11 (100%) wanted to have another book discussion group in the upcoming year. Conclusion: We believe that the use of a book discussion group can be a novel, inspiring strategy to teach quality improvement in a residency program.
topic quality improvement
book club
residency education
url http://journals.tbzmed.ac.ir/RDME/Manuscript/RDME-4-189.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT benjamindoolittle teachingqualityimprovementthroughabookclub
AT jaideeptalwalkar teachingqualityimprovementthroughabookclub
_version_ 1725451227897004032