Teaching Quality Improvement Through a Book Club
Introduction: Quality Improvement projects are an important part of residency education in the United States and are required for accreditation by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Participation in standard chart-based quality improvement had failed to generate excitement amo...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
2015-12-01
|
Series: | Research and Development in Medical Education |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journals.tbzmed.ac.ir/RDME/Manuscript/RDME-4-189.pdf |
id |
doaj-19b0d3d564bb4b209ebe83105ece4fa1 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-19b0d3d564bb4b209ebe83105ece4fa12020-11-24T23:58:12ZengTabriz University of Medical SciencesResearch and Development in Medical Education2322-27192015-12-014218919110.15171/rdme.2015.033RDME_3268_20150710075329Teaching Quality Improvement Through a Book ClubBenjamin Doolittle0Jaideep Talwalkar1MD, MDIV, Associate Professor, Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, PO BOX 8033 – Yale Station, 333 Cedar Street – 1091LMP, New Haven, CT 06520-8033Assistant Professor, Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, PO BOX 8033 – Yale Station, 333 Cedar Street – 1091LMP, New Haven, CT 06520-8033Introduction: Quality Improvement projects are an important part of residency education in the United States and are required for accreditation by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Participation in standard chart-based quality improvement had failed to generate excitement among residents in our program. The objective of our innovation was to inspire interest in quality improvement among our residents. Methods: Our residency program instituted a book discussion group. Attendance and participation of attendees was recorded, and residents were sent a follow-up survey one month after the activity to gauge their impressions. Results: Out of 16 residents in the program, 12 attended the discussion group, and all attendees participated in the discussion. The follow-up survey revealed that 10/11 (91%) of respondents had read at least part of the book and 11/11 (100%) wanted to have another book discussion group in the upcoming year. Conclusion: We believe that the use of a book discussion group can be a novel, inspiring strategy to teach quality improvement in a residency program.http://journals.tbzmed.ac.ir/RDME/Manuscript/RDME-4-189.pdfquality improvementbook clubresidency education |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Benjamin Doolittle Jaideep Talwalkar |
spellingShingle |
Benjamin Doolittle Jaideep Talwalkar Teaching Quality Improvement Through a Book Club Research and Development in Medical Education quality improvement book club residency education |
author_facet |
Benjamin Doolittle Jaideep Talwalkar |
author_sort |
Benjamin Doolittle |
title |
Teaching Quality Improvement Through a Book Club |
title_short |
Teaching Quality Improvement Through a Book Club |
title_full |
Teaching Quality Improvement Through a Book Club |
title_fullStr |
Teaching Quality Improvement Through a Book Club |
title_full_unstemmed |
Teaching Quality Improvement Through a Book Club |
title_sort |
teaching quality improvement through a book club |
publisher |
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences |
series |
Research and Development in Medical Education |
issn |
2322-2719 |
publishDate |
2015-12-01 |
description |
Introduction: Quality Improvement projects are an important part of residency education in the United States and are required for accreditation by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Participation in standard chart-based quality improvement had failed to generate excitement among residents in our program. The objective of our innovation was to inspire interest in quality improvement among our residents.
Methods: Our residency program instituted a book discussion group. Attendance and participation of attendees was recorded, and residents were sent a follow-up survey one month after the activity to gauge their impressions.
Results: Out of 16 residents in the program, 12 attended the discussion group, and all attendees participated in the discussion. The follow-up survey revealed that 10/11 (91%) of respondents had read at least part of the book and 11/11 (100%) wanted to have another book discussion group in the upcoming year.
Conclusion: We believe that the use of a book discussion group can be a novel, inspiring strategy to teach quality improvement in a residency program. |
topic |
quality improvement book club residency education |
url |
http://journals.tbzmed.ac.ir/RDME/Manuscript/RDME-4-189.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT benjamindoolittle teachingqualityimprovementthroughabookclub AT jaideeptalwalkar teachingqualityimprovementthroughabookclub |
_version_ |
1725451227897004032 |