Is the Environmental Kuznets Curve Still Valid: A Perspective of Wicked Problems

Historically, academia has paid much attention to environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) associated hypotheses, and the EKC per se has triggered conflicting reactions since first posited. Yet, all controversies seem not to have any base framework to address further pollution-related strategies. Built upo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jingling Chen, Tao Eric Hu, Rob van Tulder
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-08-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/17/4747
id doaj-19ab42f36bca446e9df8c659286f5bc1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-19ab42f36bca446e9df8c659286f5bc12020-11-25T01:17:15ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502019-08-011117474710.3390/su11174747su11174747Is the Environmental Kuznets Curve Still Valid: A Perspective of Wicked ProblemsJingling Chen0Tao Eric Hu1Rob van Tulder2Department of Business, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225000, ChinaDepartment of Accounting Information Systems, California State University, Northridge, CA 91330-8372, USAPartnerships Resource Center, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, 3062 PA Rotterdam, The NetherlandsHistorically, academia has paid much attention to environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) associated hypotheses, and the EKC per se has triggered conflicting reactions since first posited. Yet, all controversies seem not to have any base framework to address further pollution-related strategies. Built upon an extensive critical review of the extant EKC literature, this paper attempts to address the gap by introducing the theory of wicked problems that can be used to reframe the extant EKC research. Integrating and synthesizing the theories and empirical findings of the extant EKC literature, this paper develops a conceptual framework (a research agenda), and suggests that, given humans’ bound rationality and societal uncertainties, the EKC pattern may not be valid for the situations of more wicked pollution. Mainly focusing on this type of pollution, the paper contributes to the EKC study in proposing a set of causal relationships built upon the attitudes of societal sectors. The paper points to the necessity of distinguishing the less wicked pollution situations from the more wicked ones that require different practical and academic strategies to deal with. The former can be addressed along with economic growth, and the latter requires proactive attitudes, proactive leadership, and strong organization of societal sectors. In doing so, we hope to advance the conversation surrounding EKC studies and the abatement practice adaption. Contributions of this study and future research avenues for empirical verifications of the theory are then discussed.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/17/4747environmental Kuznets curvewicked problemssocietal sectorcollaborationtriggering event
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jingling Chen
Tao Eric Hu
Rob van Tulder
spellingShingle Jingling Chen
Tao Eric Hu
Rob van Tulder
Is the Environmental Kuznets Curve Still Valid: A Perspective of Wicked Problems
Sustainability
environmental Kuznets curve
wicked problems
societal sector
collaboration
triggering event
author_facet Jingling Chen
Tao Eric Hu
Rob van Tulder
author_sort Jingling Chen
title Is the Environmental Kuznets Curve Still Valid: A Perspective of Wicked Problems
title_short Is the Environmental Kuznets Curve Still Valid: A Perspective of Wicked Problems
title_full Is the Environmental Kuznets Curve Still Valid: A Perspective of Wicked Problems
title_fullStr Is the Environmental Kuznets Curve Still Valid: A Perspective of Wicked Problems
title_full_unstemmed Is the Environmental Kuznets Curve Still Valid: A Perspective of Wicked Problems
title_sort is the environmental kuznets curve still valid: a perspective of wicked problems
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2019-08-01
description Historically, academia has paid much attention to environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) associated hypotheses, and the EKC per se has triggered conflicting reactions since first posited. Yet, all controversies seem not to have any base framework to address further pollution-related strategies. Built upon an extensive critical review of the extant EKC literature, this paper attempts to address the gap by introducing the theory of wicked problems that can be used to reframe the extant EKC research. Integrating and synthesizing the theories and empirical findings of the extant EKC literature, this paper develops a conceptual framework (a research agenda), and suggests that, given humans’ bound rationality and societal uncertainties, the EKC pattern may not be valid for the situations of more wicked pollution. Mainly focusing on this type of pollution, the paper contributes to the EKC study in proposing a set of causal relationships built upon the attitudes of societal sectors. The paper points to the necessity of distinguishing the less wicked pollution situations from the more wicked ones that require different practical and academic strategies to deal with. The former can be addressed along with economic growth, and the latter requires proactive attitudes, proactive leadership, and strong organization of societal sectors. In doing so, we hope to advance the conversation surrounding EKC studies and the abatement practice adaption. Contributions of this study and future research avenues for empirical verifications of the theory are then discussed.
topic environmental Kuznets curve
wicked problems
societal sector
collaboration
triggering event
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/17/4747
work_keys_str_mv AT jinglingchen istheenvironmentalkuznetscurvestillvalidaperspectiveofwickedproblems
AT taoerichu istheenvironmentalkuznetscurvestillvalidaperspectiveofwickedproblems
AT robvantulder istheenvironmentalkuznetscurvestillvalidaperspectiveofwickedproblems
_version_ 1725147120887922688