Time, science and consensus: the different times involving scientific research, political decision and public opinion

This essay analyses the asymmetrical relationship between the time of scientific research and the time of the different segments interested in their results, focusing mainly on necessity to establish technical consensus about the fields of science that require rigorous investigations and texts. In t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: José Aparecido de, Isaac Epstein
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu (Unesp) 2010-01-01
Series:Interface: Comunicação, Saúde, Educação
Subjects:
Online Access:http://socialsciences.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1414-32832010000100010&lng=en&tlng=en
id doaj-19a77b295851421c817eb7ec9afa8b1b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-19a77b295851421c817eb7ec9afa8b1b2020-11-25T01:32:23ZengFaculdade de Medicina de Botucatu (Unesp)Interface: Comunicação, Saúde, Educação1414-32832010-01-015seS1414-32832010000100010Time, science and consensus: the different times involving scientific research, political decision and public opinionJosé Aparecido de0Isaac Epstein1IUniversidade Metodista Izabela HendrixIIFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa no Estado de São Paulo/FAPESPThis essay analyses the asymmetrical relationship between the time of scientific research and the time of the different segments interested in their results, focusing mainly on necessity to establish technical consensus about the fields of science that require rigorous investigations and texts. In the last years, civil society sectors - mainly scientific journalism, legislative power, and public opinion - has shown growing interest in participating of the decision making process that regulates science routes. In this study, we analyzed the decision making process of the Biosafety Law, as it allows research with embryonic stem cells in Brazil. The results allow us to conclude that this asymmetrical relationship between the different times (of science, scientific disclosure, public opinion, and public power) contribute to the maturing of the dialog on scientific policies, as well as to the establishment of a consensus concerning science routes, which aims at the democratization of scientific work.http://socialsciences.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1414-32832010000100010&lng=en&tlng=enCienciaConocimientoOpinión PúblicaDivulgación Científica
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author José Aparecido de
Isaac Epstein
spellingShingle José Aparecido de
Isaac Epstein
Time, science and consensus: the different times involving scientific research, political decision and public opinion
Interface: Comunicação, Saúde, Educação
Ciencia
Conocimiento
Opinión Pública
Divulgación Científica
author_facet José Aparecido de
Isaac Epstein
author_sort José Aparecido de
title Time, science and consensus: the different times involving scientific research, political decision and public opinion
title_short Time, science and consensus: the different times involving scientific research, political decision and public opinion
title_full Time, science and consensus: the different times involving scientific research, political decision and public opinion
title_fullStr Time, science and consensus: the different times involving scientific research, political decision and public opinion
title_full_unstemmed Time, science and consensus: the different times involving scientific research, political decision and public opinion
title_sort time, science and consensus: the different times involving scientific research, political decision and public opinion
publisher Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu (Unesp)
series Interface: Comunicação, Saúde, Educação
issn 1414-3283
publishDate 2010-01-01
description This essay analyses the asymmetrical relationship between the time of scientific research and the time of the different segments interested in their results, focusing mainly on necessity to establish technical consensus about the fields of science that require rigorous investigations and texts. In the last years, civil society sectors - mainly scientific journalism, legislative power, and public opinion - has shown growing interest in participating of the decision making process that regulates science routes. In this study, we analyzed the decision making process of the Biosafety Law, as it allows research with embryonic stem cells in Brazil. The results allow us to conclude that this asymmetrical relationship between the different times (of science, scientific disclosure, public opinion, and public power) contribute to the maturing of the dialog on scientific policies, as well as to the establishment of a consensus concerning science routes, which aims at the democratization of scientific work.
topic Ciencia
Conocimiento
Opinión Pública
Divulgación Científica
url http://socialsciences.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1414-32832010000100010&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT joseaparecidode timescienceandconsensusthedifferenttimesinvolvingscientificresearchpoliticaldecisionandpublicopinion
AT isaacepstein timescienceandconsensusthedifferenttimesinvolvingscientificresearchpoliticaldecisionandpublicopinion
_version_ 1725082378765860864