Economic evaluation of alternative testing regimes and settings to detect undiagnosed HIV in Australia

Abstract Background The study aimed to estimate the comparative costs per positive diagnosis of previously undetected HIV in three testing regimes: conventional; parallel and point of care (POC) testing. The regimes are analysed in six testing settings in Australia where infection is concentrated bu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Owain D. Williams, Judith A. Dean, Anna Crothers, Charles F. Gilks, Jeff Gow
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-01-01
Series:BMC Health Services Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-06040-5
id doaj-19a712099c9d43478deb803e0a1bb9c1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-19a712099c9d43478deb803e0a1bb9c12021-01-10T12:12:17ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632021-01-0121111210.1186/s12913-020-06040-5Economic evaluation of alternative testing regimes and settings to detect undiagnosed HIV in AustraliaOwain D. Williams0Judith A. Dean1Anna Crothers2Charles F. Gilks3Jeff Gow4School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of QueenslandSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of QueenslandSchool of Medicine, Griffith UniversitySchool of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of QueenslandSchool of Commerce, University of Southern QueenslandAbstract Background The study aimed to estimate the comparative costs per positive diagnosis of previously undetected HIV in three testing regimes: conventional; parallel and point of care (POC) testing. The regimes are analysed in six testing settings in Australia where infection is concentrated but with low prevalence. Methods A cost model was developed to highlight the trade-offs between test and economic efficiency from a provider perspective. First, an estimate of the number of tests needed to find a true (previously undiagnosed) positive diagnosis was made. Second, estimates of the average cost per positive diagnosis in whole of population (WoP) and men who have sex with men (MSM) was made, then third, aggregated to the total cost for diagnosis of all undetected infections. Results Parallel testing is as effective as conventional testing, but more economically efficient. POC testing provide two significant advantages over conventional testing: they screen out negatives effectively at comparatively lower cost and, with confirmatory testing of reactive results, there is no loss in efficiency. The average and total costs per detection in WoP are prohibitive, except for Home Self Testing. The diagnosis in MSM is cost effective in all settings, but especially using Home Self Testing when the individual assumes the cost of testing. Conclusions This study illustrates the trade-offs between economic and test efficiency and their interactions with population(s) prevalence. The efficient testing regimes and settings are presently under or not funded in Australia. Home Self Testing has the potential to dramatically increase testing rates at very little cost.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-06040-5HIV testingConventional testingParallel testingPoint of care testingSelf-testingCosts
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Owain D. Williams
Judith A. Dean
Anna Crothers
Charles F. Gilks
Jeff Gow
spellingShingle Owain D. Williams
Judith A. Dean
Anna Crothers
Charles F. Gilks
Jeff Gow
Economic evaluation of alternative testing regimes and settings to detect undiagnosed HIV in Australia
BMC Health Services Research
HIV testing
Conventional testing
Parallel testing
Point of care testing
Self-testing
Costs
author_facet Owain D. Williams
Judith A. Dean
Anna Crothers
Charles F. Gilks
Jeff Gow
author_sort Owain D. Williams
title Economic evaluation of alternative testing regimes and settings to detect undiagnosed HIV in Australia
title_short Economic evaluation of alternative testing regimes and settings to detect undiagnosed HIV in Australia
title_full Economic evaluation of alternative testing regimes and settings to detect undiagnosed HIV in Australia
title_fullStr Economic evaluation of alternative testing regimes and settings to detect undiagnosed HIV in Australia
title_full_unstemmed Economic evaluation of alternative testing regimes and settings to detect undiagnosed HIV in Australia
title_sort economic evaluation of alternative testing regimes and settings to detect undiagnosed hiv in australia
publisher BMC
series BMC Health Services Research
issn 1472-6963
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Abstract Background The study aimed to estimate the comparative costs per positive diagnosis of previously undetected HIV in three testing regimes: conventional; parallel and point of care (POC) testing. The regimes are analysed in six testing settings in Australia where infection is concentrated but with low prevalence. Methods A cost model was developed to highlight the trade-offs between test and economic efficiency from a provider perspective. First, an estimate of the number of tests needed to find a true (previously undiagnosed) positive diagnosis was made. Second, estimates of the average cost per positive diagnosis in whole of population (WoP) and men who have sex with men (MSM) was made, then third, aggregated to the total cost for diagnosis of all undetected infections. Results Parallel testing is as effective as conventional testing, but more economically efficient. POC testing provide two significant advantages over conventional testing: they screen out negatives effectively at comparatively lower cost and, with confirmatory testing of reactive results, there is no loss in efficiency. The average and total costs per detection in WoP are prohibitive, except for Home Self Testing. The diagnosis in MSM is cost effective in all settings, but especially using Home Self Testing when the individual assumes the cost of testing. Conclusions This study illustrates the trade-offs between economic and test efficiency and their interactions with population(s) prevalence. The efficient testing regimes and settings are presently under or not funded in Australia. Home Self Testing has the potential to dramatically increase testing rates at very little cost.
topic HIV testing
Conventional testing
Parallel testing
Point of care testing
Self-testing
Costs
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-06040-5
work_keys_str_mv AT owaindwilliams economicevaluationofalternativetestingregimesandsettingstodetectundiagnosedhivinaustralia
AT judithadean economicevaluationofalternativetestingregimesandsettingstodetectundiagnosedhivinaustralia
AT annacrothers economicevaluationofalternativetestingregimesandsettingstodetectundiagnosedhivinaustralia
AT charlesfgilks economicevaluationofalternativetestingregimesandsettingstodetectundiagnosedhivinaustralia
AT jeffgow economicevaluationofalternativetestingregimesandsettingstodetectundiagnosedhivinaustralia
_version_ 1724343272015396864