Economic evaluation of alternative testing regimes and settings to detect undiagnosed HIV in Australia
Abstract Background The study aimed to estimate the comparative costs per positive diagnosis of previously undetected HIV in three testing regimes: conventional; parallel and point of care (POC) testing. The regimes are analysed in six testing settings in Australia where infection is concentrated bu...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2021-01-01
|
Series: | BMC Health Services Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-06040-5 |
id |
doaj-19a712099c9d43478deb803e0a1bb9c1 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-19a712099c9d43478deb803e0a1bb9c12021-01-10T12:12:17ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632021-01-0121111210.1186/s12913-020-06040-5Economic evaluation of alternative testing regimes and settings to detect undiagnosed HIV in AustraliaOwain D. Williams0Judith A. Dean1Anna Crothers2Charles F. Gilks3Jeff Gow4School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of QueenslandSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of QueenslandSchool of Medicine, Griffith UniversitySchool of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of QueenslandSchool of Commerce, University of Southern QueenslandAbstract Background The study aimed to estimate the comparative costs per positive diagnosis of previously undetected HIV in three testing regimes: conventional; parallel and point of care (POC) testing. The regimes are analysed in six testing settings in Australia where infection is concentrated but with low prevalence. Methods A cost model was developed to highlight the trade-offs between test and economic efficiency from a provider perspective. First, an estimate of the number of tests needed to find a true (previously undiagnosed) positive diagnosis was made. Second, estimates of the average cost per positive diagnosis in whole of population (WoP) and men who have sex with men (MSM) was made, then third, aggregated to the total cost for diagnosis of all undetected infections. Results Parallel testing is as effective as conventional testing, but more economically efficient. POC testing provide two significant advantages over conventional testing: they screen out negatives effectively at comparatively lower cost and, with confirmatory testing of reactive results, there is no loss in efficiency. The average and total costs per detection in WoP are prohibitive, except for Home Self Testing. The diagnosis in MSM is cost effective in all settings, but especially using Home Self Testing when the individual assumes the cost of testing. Conclusions This study illustrates the trade-offs between economic and test efficiency and their interactions with population(s) prevalence. The efficient testing regimes and settings are presently under or not funded in Australia. Home Self Testing has the potential to dramatically increase testing rates at very little cost.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-06040-5HIV testingConventional testingParallel testingPoint of care testingSelf-testingCosts |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Owain D. Williams Judith A. Dean Anna Crothers Charles F. Gilks Jeff Gow |
spellingShingle |
Owain D. Williams Judith A. Dean Anna Crothers Charles F. Gilks Jeff Gow Economic evaluation of alternative testing regimes and settings to detect undiagnosed HIV in Australia BMC Health Services Research HIV testing Conventional testing Parallel testing Point of care testing Self-testing Costs |
author_facet |
Owain D. Williams Judith A. Dean Anna Crothers Charles F. Gilks Jeff Gow |
author_sort |
Owain D. Williams |
title |
Economic evaluation of alternative testing regimes and settings to detect undiagnosed HIV in Australia |
title_short |
Economic evaluation of alternative testing regimes and settings to detect undiagnosed HIV in Australia |
title_full |
Economic evaluation of alternative testing regimes and settings to detect undiagnosed HIV in Australia |
title_fullStr |
Economic evaluation of alternative testing regimes and settings to detect undiagnosed HIV in Australia |
title_full_unstemmed |
Economic evaluation of alternative testing regimes and settings to detect undiagnosed HIV in Australia |
title_sort |
economic evaluation of alternative testing regimes and settings to detect undiagnosed hiv in australia |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Health Services Research |
issn |
1472-6963 |
publishDate |
2021-01-01 |
description |
Abstract Background The study aimed to estimate the comparative costs per positive diagnosis of previously undetected HIV in three testing regimes: conventional; parallel and point of care (POC) testing. The regimes are analysed in six testing settings in Australia where infection is concentrated but with low prevalence. Methods A cost model was developed to highlight the trade-offs between test and economic efficiency from a provider perspective. First, an estimate of the number of tests needed to find a true (previously undiagnosed) positive diagnosis was made. Second, estimates of the average cost per positive diagnosis in whole of population (WoP) and men who have sex with men (MSM) was made, then third, aggregated to the total cost for diagnosis of all undetected infections. Results Parallel testing is as effective as conventional testing, but more economically efficient. POC testing provide two significant advantages over conventional testing: they screen out negatives effectively at comparatively lower cost and, with confirmatory testing of reactive results, there is no loss in efficiency. The average and total costs per detection in WoP are prohibitive, except for Home Self Testing. The diagnosis in MSM is cost effective in all settings, but especially using Home Self Testing when the individual assumes the cost of testing. Conclusions This study illustrates the trade-offs between economic and test efficiency and their interactions with population(s) prevalence. The efficient testing regimes and settings are presently under or not funded in Australia. Home Self Testing has the potential to dramatically increase testing rates at very little cost. |
topic |
HIV testing Conventional testing Parallel testing Point of care testing Self-testing Costs |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-06040-5 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT owaindwilliams economicevaluationofalternativetestingregimesandsettingstodetectundiagnosedhivinaustralia AT judithadean economicevaluationofalternativetestingregimesandsettingstodetectundiagnosedhivinaustralia AT annacrothers economicevaluationofalternativetestingregimesandsettingstodetectundiagnosedhivinaustralia AT charlesfgilks economicevaluationofalternativetestingregimesandsettingstodetectundiagnosedhivinaustralia AT jeffgow economicevaluationofalternativetestingregimesandsettingstodetectundiagnosedhivinaustralia |
_version_ |
1724343272015396864 |