Low acceptability of A/H1N1 pandemic vaccination in French adult population: did public health policy fuel public dissonance?

BACKGROUND: In July 2009, French public health authorities embarked in a mass vaccination campaign against A/H1N1 2009 pandemic-influenza. We explored the attitudes and behaviors of the general population toward pandemic vaccination. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We conducted a cross-sectional onl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michaël Schwarzinger, Rémi Flicoteaux, Sébastien Cortarenoda, Yolande Obadia, Jean-Paul Moatti
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2010-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2856629?pdf=render
id doaj-19a0cceddf9a428699ea9d0c1bc33502
record_format Article
spelling doaj-19a0cceddf9a428699ea9d0c1bc335022020-11-25T01:12:14ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032010-01-0154e1019910.1371/journal.pone.0010199Low acceptability of A/H1N1 pandemic vaccination in French adult population: did public health policy fuel public dissonance?Michaël SchwarzingerRémi FlicoteauxSébastien CortarenodaYolande ObadiaJean-Paul MoattiBACKGROUND: In July 2009, French public health authorities embarked in a mass vaccination campaign against A/H1N1 2009 pandemic-influenza. We explored the attitudes and behaviors of the general population toward pandemic vaccination. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We conducted a cross-sectional online survey among 2,253 French representative adults aged 18 to 64 from November 17 to 25, 2009 (completion rate: 93.8%). The main outcome was the acceptability of A/H1N1 vaccination as defined by previous receipt or intention to get vaccinated ("Yes, certainly", "Yes, probably"). Overall 17.0% (CI 95%, 15.5% to 18.7%) of respondents accepted A/H1N1 vaccination. Independent factors associated with acceptability included: male sex (p = .0001); older age (p = .002); highest or lowest level of education (p = .016); non-clerical occupation (p = .011); having only one child (p = .008); and having received seasonal flu vaccination in prior 3 years (p<.0001). Acceptability was also significantly higher among pregnant women (37.9%) and other at risk groups with chronic diseases (34.8%) (p = .002). Only 35.5% of respondents perceived A/H1N1 influenza illness as a severe disease and 12.7% had experienced A/H1N1 cases in their close relationships with higher acceptability (p<.0001 and p = .006, respectively). In comparison to 26.0% respondents who did not consult their primary care physician, acceptability was significantly higher among 8.0% respondents who were formally advised to get vaccinated, and lower among 63.7% respondents who were not advised to get vaccinated (respectively: 15.8%, 59.5% and 11.7%- p<.0001). Among respondents who refused vaccination, 71.2% expressed concerns about vaccine safety. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our survey occurred one week before the peak of the pandemic in France. We found that alarming public health messages aiming at increasing the perception of risk severity were counteracted by daily personal experience which did not confirm the threat, while vaccine safety was a major issue. This dissonance may have been amplified by having not involved primary care physicians in the mass vaccination campaign.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2856629?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Michaël Schwarzinger
Rémi Flicoteaux
Sébastien Cortarenoda
Yolande Obadia
Jean-Paul Moatti
spellingShingle Michaël Schwarzinger
Rémi Flicoteaux
Sébastien Cortarenoda
Yolande Obadia
Jean-Paul Moatti
Low acceptability of A/H1N1 pandemic vaccination in French adult population: did public health policy fuel public dissonance?
PLoS ONE
author_facet Michaël Schwarzinger
Rémi Flicoteaux
Sébastien Cortarenoda
Yolande Obadia
Jean-Paul Moatti
author_sort Michaël Schwarzinger
title Low acceptability of A/H1N1 pandemic vaccination in French adult population: did public health policy fuel public dissonance?
title_short Low acceptability of A/H1N1 pandemic vaccination in French adult population: did public health policy fuel public dissonance?
title_full Low acceptability of A/H1N1 pandemic vaccination in French adult population: did public health policy fuel public dissonance?
title_fullStr Low acceptability of A/H1N1 pandemic vaccination in French adult population: did public health policy fuel public dissonance?
title_full_unstemmed Low acceptability of A/H1N1 pandemic vaccination in French adult population: did public health policy fuel public dissonance?
title_sort low acceptability of a/h1n1 pandemic vaccination in french adult population: did public health policy fuel public dissonance?
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2010-01-01
description BACKGROUND: In July 2009, French public health authorities embarked in a mass vaccination campaign against A/H1N1 2009 pandemic-influenza. We explored the attitudes and behaviors of the general population toward pandemic vaccination. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We conducted a cross-sectional online survey among 2,253 French representative adults aged 18 to 64 from November 17 to 25, 2009 (completion rate: 93.8%). The main outcome was the acceptability of A/H1N1 vaccination as defined by previous receipt or intention to get vaccinated ("Yes, certainly", "Yes, probably"). Overall 17.0% (CI 95%, 15.5% to 18.7%) of respondents accepted A/H1N1 vaccination. Independent factors associated with acceptability included: male sex (p = .0001); older age (p = .002); highest or lowest level of education (p = .016); non-clerical occupation (p = .011); having only one child (p = .008); and having received seasonal flu vaccination in prior 3 years (p<.0001). Acceptability was also significantly higher among pregnant women (37.9%) and other at risk groups with chronic diseases (34.8%) (p = .002). Only 35.5% of respondents perceived A/H1N1 influenza illness as a severe disease and 12.7% had experienced A/H1N1 cases in their close relationships with higher acceptability (p<.0001 and p = .006, respectively). In comparison to 26.0% respondents who did not consult their primary care physician, acceptability was significantly higher among 8.0% respondents who were formally advised to get vaccinated, and lower among 63.7% respondents who were not advised to get vaccinated (respectively: 15.8%, 59.5% and 11.7%- p<.0001). Among respondents who refused vaccination, 71.2% expressed concerns about vaccine safety. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our survey occurred one week before the peak of the pandemic in France. We found that alarming public health messages aiming at increasing the perception of risk severity were counteracted by daily personal experience which did not confirm the threat, while vaccine safety was a major issue. This dissonance may have been amplified by having not involved primary care physicians in the mass vaccination campaign.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2856629?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT michaelschwarzinger lowacceptabilityofah1n1pandemicvaccinationinfrenchadultpopulationdidpublichealthpolicyfuelpublicdissonance
AT remiflicoteaux lowacceptabilityofah1n1pandemicvaccinationinfrenchadultpopulationdidpublichealthpolicyfuelpublicdissonance
AT sebastiencortarenoda lowacceptabilityofah1n1pandemicvaccinationinfrenchadultpopulationdidpublichealthpolicyfuelpublicdissonance
AT yolandeobadia lowacceptabilityofah1n1pandemicvaccinationinfrenchadultpopulationdidpublichealthpolicyfuelpublicdissonance
AT jeanpaulmoatti lowacceptabilityofah1n1pandemicvaccinationinfrenchadultpopulationdidpublichealthpolicyfuelpublicdissonance
_version_ 1725167714716090368