Parametric motivation bases of floranimic nomination

The period of further development in the cognitive theory of nomination has been extensive in recent years. Our research has been concentrated on the formation of conceptual foundations in cognitive theory of flora nomination. The macrofield of flora namings embraces three microfields: parametric,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Olga P. Ryabko
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sourthern Federal University 2016-09-01
Series:Izvestiâ Ûžnogo Federalʹnogo Universiteta: Filologičeskie Nauki
Subjects:
Online Access:http://philol-journal.sfedu.ru/index.php/sfuphilol/article/view/939
id doaj-19a05552d9ac4c2d8d2546c814665b70
record_format Article
spelling doaj-19a05552d9ac4c2d8d2546c814665b702020-11-25T02:02:58ZengSourthern Federal UniversityIzvestiâ Ûžnogo Federalʹnogo Universiteta: Filologičeskie Nauki1995-06402312-13432016-09-012016310411110.18522/1995-0640-2016-3-104-111Parametric motivation bases of floranimic nominationOlga P. Ryabko0Southern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, Russian FederationThe period of further development in the cognitive theory of nomination has been extensive in recent years. Our research has been concentrated on the formation of conceptual foundations in cognitive theory of flora nomination. The macrofield of flora namings embraces three microfields: parametric, pragmatic and locative-temporal ones. They determine motivation processes in cognitive theory of flora nomination, i.e., the presentation of systematic qualities in flora namings in the English language. The description and characterization of such qualities presupposes the existence of their taxonomic organization and methodology criteria, both general and practical ones. Flora namings on the phenomenological level are considered to be the products of naöve-cognitive consciousness of language speakers. They are determined, from the one hand, by the external perceptive adaptations (parametric nomination) and, from the other hand, by practical needs (pure pragmatic nomination) and local-temporal nomination. In this article we have concentrated on the complex parametric motivated basis of flora nomination. It is presented by a number of qualities, firstly, by dominative qualities («form», «appearance and manner of growth», «color»), secondly, by peripheral qualities («odour», «taste», «size») and, finally, by minor qualities («sound», «weight», «genger»). In the structure of complex parametric nomination the only one conerete qualitative element from the whole combination of qualities becomes the leading one. The cultural-archetypal dominant element determines. In each concrete situation, the choice of preferable prototypal motivated quality.http://philol-journal.sfedu.ru/index.php/sfuphilol/article/view/939cognitive theoryflora nominationtaxonomic organizationphenomenological levelnaïve-cognitive consciousnesscultural archetype
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Olga P. Ryabko
spellingShingle Olga P. Ryabko
Parametric motivation bases of floranimic nomination
Izvestiâ Ûžnogo Federalʹnogo Universiteta: Filologičeskie Nauki
cognitive theory
flora nomination
taxonomic organization
phenomenological level
naïve-cognitive consciousness
cultural archetype
author_facet Olga P. Ryabko
author_sort Olga P. Ryabko
title Parametric motivation bases of floranimic nomination
title_short Parametric motivation bases of floranimic nomination
title_full Parametric motivation bases of floranimic nomination
title_fullStr Parametric motivation bases of floranimic nomination
title_full_unstemmed Parametric motivation bases of floranimic nomination
title_sort parametric motivation bases of floranimic nomination
publisher Sourthern Federal University
series Izvestiâ Ûžnogo Federalʹnogo Universiteta: Filologičeskie Nauki
issn 1995-0640
2312-1343
publishDate 2016-09-01
description The period of further development in the cognitive theory of nomination has been extensive in recent years. Our research has been concentrated on the formation of conceptual foundations in cognitive theory of flora nomination. The macrofield of flora namings embraces three microfields: parametric, pragmatic and locative-temporal ones. They determine motivation processes in cognitive theory of flora nomination, i.e., the presentation of systematic qualities in flora namings in the English language. The description and characterization of such qualities presupposes the existence of their taxonomic organization and methodology criteria, both general and practical ones. Flora namings on the phenomenological level are considered to be the products of naöve-cognitive consciousness of language speakers. They are determined, from the one hand, by the external perceptive adaptations (parametric nomination) and, from the other hand, by practical needs (pure pragmatic nomination) and local-temporal nomination. In this article we have concentrated on the complex parametric motivated basis of flora nomination. It is presented by a number of qualities, firstly, by dominative qualities («form», «appearance and manner of growth», «color»), secondly, by peripheral qualities («odour», «taste», «size») and, finally, by minor qualities («sound», «weight», «genger»). In the structure of complex parametric nomination the only one conerete qualitative element from the whole combination of qualities becomes the leading one. The cultural-archetypal dominant element determines. In each concrete situation, the choice of preferable prototypal motivated quality.
topic cognitive theory
flora nomination
taxonomic organization
phenomenological level
naïve-cognitive consciousness
cultural archetype
url http://philol-journal.sfedu.ru/index.php/sfuphilol/article/view/939
work_keys_str_mv AT olgapryabko parametricmotivationbasesoffloranimicnomination
_version_ 1724950277913575424