Forest Carbon Gain and Loss in Protected Areas of Uganda: Implications to Carbon Benefits of Conservation

Uganda designated 16% of its land as Protected Area (PA). The original goal was natural resources, habitat and biodiversity conservation. However, PAs also offer great potential for carbon conservation in the context of climate change mitigation. Drawing on a wall-to-wall map of forest carbon change...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Belachew Gizachew, Svein Solberg, Stefano Puliti
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-11-01
Series:Land
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/7/4/138
id doaj-199898bb485948039d957c0963b72101
record_format Article
spelling doaj-199898bb485948039d957c0963b721012020-11-24T23:20:36ZengMDPI AGLand2073-445X2018-11-017413810.3390/land7040138land7040138Forest Carbon Gain and Loss in Protected Areas of Uganda: Implications to Carbon Benefits of ConservationBelachew Gizachew0Svein Solberg1Stefano Puliti2Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research (NIBIO), Høgskoleveien 8, 1431 Ås, NorwayNorwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research (NIBIO), Høgskoleveien 8, 1431 Ås, NorwayNorwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research (NIBIO), Høgskoleveien 8, 1431 Ås, NorwayUganda designated 16% of its land as Protected Area (PA). The original goal was natural resources, habitat and biodiversity conservation. However, PAs also offer great potential for carbon conservation in the context of climate change mitigation. Drawing on a wall-to-wall map of forest carbon change for the entire Uganda, that was developed using two Digital Elevation Model (DEM) datasets for the period 2000⁻2012, we (1) quantified forest carbon gain and loss within 713 PAs and their external buffer zones, (2) tested variations in forest carbon change among management categories, and (3) evaluated the effectiveness of PAs and the prevalence of local leakage in terms of forest carbon. The net annual forest carbon gain in PAs of Uganda was 0.22 ± 1.36 t/ha, but a significant proportion (63%) of the PAs exhibited a net carbon loss. Further, carbon gain and loss varied significantly among management categories. About 37% of the PAs were “effective„, i.e., gained or at least maintained forest carbon during the period. Nevertheless, carbon losses in the external buffer zones of those effective PAs significantly contrast with carbon gains inside of the PA boundaries, providing evidence of leakage and thus, isolation. The combined carbon losses inside the boundaries of a large number of PAs, together with leakage in external buffer zones suggest that PAs, regardless of the management categories, are threatened by deforestation and forest degradation. If Uganda will have to benefit from carbon conservation from its large number of PAs through climate change mitigation mechanisms such as REDD+, there is an urgent need to look into some of the current PA management approaches, and design protection strategies that account for the surrounding landscapes and communities outside of the PAs.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/7/4/138carbon changeleakageUgandaProtected Areas
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Belachew Gizachew
Svein Solberg
Stefano Puliti
spellingShingle Belachew Gizachew
Svein Solberg
Stefano Puliti
Forest Carbon Gain and Loss in Protected Areas of Uganda: Implications to Carbon Benefits of Conservation
Land
carbon change
leakage
Uganda
Protected Areas
author_facet Belachew Gizachew
Svein Solberg
Stefano Puliti
author_sort Belachew Gizachew
title Forest Carbon Gain and Loss in Protected Areas of Uganda: Implications to Carbon Benefits of Conservation
title_short Forest Carbon Gain and Loss in Protected Areas of Uganda: Implications to Carbon Benefits of Conservation
title_full Forest Carbon Gain and Loss in Protected Areas of Uganda: Implications to Carbon Benefits of Conservation
title_fullStr Forest Carbon Gain and Loss in Protected Areas of Uganda: Implications to Carbon Benefits of Conservation
title_full_unstemmed Forest Carbon Gain and Loss in Protected Areas of Uganda: Implications to Carbon Benefits of Conservation
title_sort forest carbon gain and loss in protected areas of uganda: implications to carbon benefits of conservation
publisher MDPI AG
series Land
issn 2073-445X
publishDate 2018-11-01
description Uganda designated 16% of its land as Protected Area (PA). The original goal was natural resources, habitat and biodiversity conservation. However, PAs also offer great potential for carbon conservation in the context of climate change mitigation. Drawing on a wall-to-wall map of forest carbon change for the entire Uganda, that was developed using two Digital Elevation Model (DEM) datasets for the period 2000⁻2012, we (1) quantified forest carbon gain and loss within 713 PAs and their external buffer zones, (2) tested variations in forest carbon change among management categories, and (3) evaluated the effectiveness of PAs and the prevalence of local leakage in terms of forest carbon. The net annual forest carbon gain in PAs of Uganda was 0.22 ± 1.36 t/ha, but a significant proportion (63%) of the PAs exhibited a net carbon loss. Further, carbon gain and loss varied significantly among management categories. About 37% of the PAs were “effective„, i.e., gained or at least maintained forest carbon during the period. Nevertheless, carbon losses in the external buffer zones of those effective PAs significantly contrast with carbon gains inside of the PA boundaries, providing evidence of leakage and thus, isolation. The combined carbon losses inside the boundaries of a large number of PAs, together with leakage in external buffer zones suggest that PAs, regardless of the management categories, are threatened by deforestation and forest degradation. If Uganda will have to benefit from carbon conservation from its large number of PAs through climate change mitigation mechanisms such as REDD+, there is an urgent need to look into some of the current PA management approaches, and design protection strategies that account for the surrounding landscapes and communities outside of the PAs.
topic carbon change
leakage
Uganda
Protected Areas
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/7/4/138
work_keys_str_mv AT belachewgizachew forestcarbongainandlossinprotectedareasofugandaimplicationstocarbonbenefitsofconservation
AT sveinsolberg forestcarbongainandlossinprotectedareasofugandaimplicationstocarbonbenefitsofconservation
AT stefanopuliti forestcarbongainandlossinprotectedareasofugandaimplicationstocarbonbenefitsofconservation
_version_ 1725574260282359808