Trade-off between positive and negative design of protein stability: from lattice models to real proteins.
Two different strategies for stabilizing proteins are (i) positive design in which the native state is stabilized and (ii) negative design in which competing non-native conformations are destabilized. Here, the circumstances under which one strategy might be favored over the other are explored in th...
Main Authors: | Orly Noivirt-Brik, Amnon Horovitz, Ron Unger |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2009-12-01
|
Series: | PLoS Computational Biology |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2781108?pdf=render |
Similar Items
-
Codon-level information improves predictions of inter-residue contacts in proteins by correlated mutation analysis
by: Etai Jacob, et al.
Published: (2015-09-01) -
N-Terminal Domains in Two-Domain Proteins Are Biased to Be Shorter and Predicted to Fold Faster Than Their C-Terminal Counterparts
by: Etai Jacob, et al.
Published: (2013-04-01) -
Hsp90 shapes protein and RNA evolution to balance trade-offs between protein stability and aggregation
by: Ron Geller, et al.
Published: (2018-05-01) -
How protein stability and new functions trade off.
by: Nobuhiko Tokuriki, et al.
Published: (2008-02-01) -
Measuring protein stability in the GroEL chaperonin cage reveals massive destabilization
by: Ilia Korobko, et al.
Published: (2020-07-01)