On the Problem of the Name rus’ in the Earliest Rus’ian Chronicles

In the article the author studies the identity that was referred to by the name rus’ in the earliest chronicles of Kievan Rus’. The analysis is based on the ideas and reconstructions of Alexei A. Shakhmatov, who proved that the famous Tale of Bygone Years (1100s) had included some earlier chronicle...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Petr S. Stefanovich
Format: Article
Language:Bulgarian
Published: Moscow State University of Education 2018-12-01
Series:Slovene
Subjects:
Online Access:http://slovene.ru/ojs/index.php/slovene/article/view/413
id doaj-1973f20038714a5bbd19d6e44e6e3bf0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1973f20038714a5bbd19d6e44e6e3bf02020-12-20T17:59:05ZbulMoscow State University of EducationSlovene2304-07852305-67542018-12-0172356382224On the Problem of the Name rus’ in the Earliest Rus’ian ChroniclesPetr S. Stefanovich0Научно-исследовательский университет–Высшая школа экономики; Институт российской истории РАН МоскваIn the article the author studies the identity that was referred to by the name rus’ in the earliest chronicles of Kievan Rus’. The analysis is based on the ideas and reconstructions of Alexei A. Shakhmatov, who proved that the famous Tale of Bygone Years (1100s) had included some earlier chronicle or annalistic texts composed in the 11th century. According to Shakhmatov, the Tale originated from the so-called “Initial Composition” written in Kiev in the 1090s. The author shows that the writer or writers of the “Composition” placed Rus’ in the world history according to the eschatological schemes of Byzantine chronicles. They understood Rus’ as a Christian people and as a powerful state, and tried to “expand” its identity over local communities. The earlier texts, which can be dated back to the mid-11th century, considered Rus’ in a different way: their authors’ efforts were to specify its identity in relation to other ethnic or political groups, stressing its military victories and ignoring religious boundaries. The author of the article concludes that the intellectuals of Kievan Rus’ were able to propose a variety of distinct “strategies of identification” and “ethnic projects”.   DOI: 10.31168/2305-6754.2018.7.2.14http://slovene.ru/ojs/index.php/slovene/article/view/413средневековая русьидентичностьэтничностьдревнерусское летописание
collection DOAJ
language Bulgarian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Petr S. Stefanovich
spellingShingle Petr S. Stefanovich
On the Problem of the Name rus’ in the Earliest Rus’ian Chronicles
Slovene
средневековая русь
идентичность
этничность
древнерусское летописание
author_facet Petr S. Stefanovich
author_sort Petr S. Stefanovich
title On the Problem of the Name rus’ in the Earliest Rus’ian Chronicles
title_short On the Problem of the Name rus’ in the Earliest Rus’ian Chronicles
title_full On the Problem of the Name rus’ in the Earliest Rus’ian Chronicles
title_fullStr On the Problem of the Name rus’ in the Earliest Rus’ian Chronicles
title_full_unstemmed On the Problem of the Name rus’ in the Earliest Rus’ian Chronicles
title_sort on the problem of the name rus’ in the earliest rus’ian chronicles
publisher Moscow State University of Education
series Slovene
issn 2304-0785
2305-6754
publishDate 2018-12-01
description In the article the author studies the identity that was referred to by the name rus’ in the earliest chronicles of Kievan Rus’. The analysis is based on the ideas and reconstructions of Alexei A. Shakhmatov, who proved that the famous Tale of Bygone Years (1100s) had included some earlier chronicle or annalistic texts composed in the 11th century. According to Shakhmatov, the Tale originated from the so-called “Initial Composition” written in Kiev in the 1090s. The author shows that the writer or writers of the “Composition” placed Rus’ in the world history according to the eschatological schemes of Byzantine chronicles. They understood Rus’ as a Christian people and as a powerful state, and tried to “expand” its identity over local communities. The earlier texts, which can be dated back to the mid-11th century, considered Rus’ in a different way: their authors’ efforts were to specify its identity in relation to other ethnic or political groups, stressing its military victories and ignoring religious boundaries. The author of the article concludes that the intellectuals of Kievan Rus’ were able to propose a variety of distinct “strategies of identification” and “ethnic projects”.   DOI: 10.31168/2305-6754.2018.7.2.14
topic средневековая русь
идентичность
этничность
древнерусское летописание
url http://slovene.ru/ojs/index.php/slovene/article/view/413
work_keys_str_mv AT petrsstefanovich ontheproblemofthenamerusintheearliestrusianchronicles
_version_ 1724376114276597760