Recovering logging residue: experiences from the Italian Eastern Alps

Conducted within the scope of a larger Italian project, the study analyzes three recovery alternatives for logging residue and identifies the conditions that make one preferable to the others. To the purpose, the authors used spreadsheet models based on experiments, which return the delivered cost o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Raffaele Spinelli, Carla Nati, Natascia Magagnotti
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Zagreb, Faculty of Forestry 2007-03-01
Series:Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hrcak.srce.hr/index.php?show=clanak_download&id_clanak_jezik=17745
id doaj-196e595b6aba4aa4afcb82abb4d548a4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-196e595b6aba4aa4afcb82abb4d548a42020-11-24T21:50:22ZengUniversity of Zagreb, Faculty of ForestryCroatian Journal of Forest Engineering1845-57192007-03-0128119Recovering logging residue: experiences from the Italian Eastern AlpsRaffaele SpinelliCarla NatiNatascia MagagnottiConducted within the scope of a larger Italian project, the study analyzes three recovery alternatives for logging residue and identifies the conditions that make one preferable to the others. To the purpose, the authors used spreadsheet models based on experiments, which return the delivered cost of biomass as a function of working conditions and costing assumptions. Chipping, bundling and transporting loose uncomminuted residue are all viable options, and they are indeed applied on a commercial scale in several Countries, including Italy. Transporting loose uncomminuted residue is the simplest method, which avoids investing in costly equipment. However, this system is constrained by the difficulty of fully exploiting vehicle payload: it is not suitable to the handling of fine slash, and is preferable only over short hauling distances. Chipping at the landing is technically the most effective method, but it requires close co-ordination of the transportation fleet. If truck delays exceed 40 minutes per load, then bundling becomes a better choice.http://hrcak.srce.hr/index.php?show=clanak_download&id_clanak_jezik=17745logging residuechippingbundlingloose transportdelivered costs
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Raffaele Spinelli
Carla Nati
Natascia Magagnotti
spellingShingle Raffaele Spinelli
Carla Nati
Natascia Magagnotti
Recovering logging residue: experiences from the Italian Eastern Alps
Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering
logging residue
chipping
bundling
loose transport
delivered costs
author_facet Raffaele Spinelli
Carla Nati
Natascia Magagnotti
author_sort Raffaele Spinelli
title Recovering logging residue: experiences from the Italian Eastern Alps
title_short Recovering logging residue: experiences from the Italian Eastern Alps
title_full Recovering logging residue: experiences from the Italian Eastern Alps
title_fullStr Recovering logging residue: experiences from the Italian Eastern Alps
title_full_unstemmed Recovering logging residue: experiences from the Italian Eastern Alps
title_sort recovering logging residue: experiences from the italian eastern alps
publisher University of Zagreb, Faculty of Forestry
series Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering
issn 1845-5719
publishDate 2007-03-01
description Conducted within the scope of a larger Italian project, the study analyzes three recovery alternatives for logging residue and identifies the conditions that make one preferable to the others. To the purpose, the authors used spreadsheet models based on experiments, which return the delivered cost of biomass as a function of working conditions and costing assumptions. Chipping, bundling and transporting loose uncomminuted residue are all viable options, and they are indeed applied on a commercial scale in several Countries, including Italy. Transporting loose uncomminuted residue is the simplest method, which avoids investing in costly equipment. However, this system is constrained by the difficulty of fully exploiting vehicle payload: it is not suitable to the handling of fine slash, and is preferable only over short hauling distances. Chipping at the landing is technically the most effective method, but it requires close co-ordination of the transportation fleet. If truck delays exceed 40 minutes per load, then bundling becomes a better choice.
topic logging residue
chipping
bundling
loose transport
delivered costs
url http://hrcak.srce.hr/index.php?show=clanak_download&id_clanak_jezik=17745
work_keys_str_mv AT raffaelespinelli recoveringloggingresidueexperiencesfromtheitalianeasternalps
AT carlanati recoveringloggingresidueexperiencesfromtheitalianeasternalps
AT natasciamagagnotti recoveringloggingresidueexperiencesfromtheitalianeasternalps
_version_ 1725884565047738368