Morphems in Language and Cinematography (Semiotic Approach)

Numerous studies of cinematic semiology in the 1960s dealt with issues related to basic units of meaning “morphems”, double articulation, levels of meaning and minor units, which were attempts by pioneers in this field to find equivalences between units of language and film. The term double articula...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: sawsan amer
Format: Article
Language:Arabic
Published: Arab Association for Islamic Civilization and Art 2021-09-01
Series:Journal of Architecture, Art & Humanistic Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://mjaf.journals.ekb.eg/article_137278.html
id doaj-1967fde0cc674141ac363ed7261d856f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1967fde0cc674141ac363ed7261d856f2021-10-02T18:20:37ZaraArab Association for Islamic Civilization and ArtJournal of Architecture, Art & Humanistic Science2356-96542357-03422021-09-0162919920710.21608/mjaf.2020.37692.1762Morphems in Language and Cinematography (Semiotic Approach)sawsan amer0faculty of applied arts - October 6 universityNumerous studies of cinematic semiology in the 1960s dealt with issues related to basic units of meaning “morphems”, double articulation, levels of meaning and minor units, which were attempts by pioneers in this field to find equivalences between units of language and film. The term double articulation appeared in the movie message, which can be divided into unites that carry the meaning in which are the morphems, which arise directly by studying the smaller unit. Metz mentioned in his interpretation of the universality of cinema two aspects: visual perception is less diverse in the world than the diversity of languages, and that cinema has no double articulation. Research problem: is one of the most important pioneers in the field of film Semiology, Metz was not inclined to interpret cinema as a language but rather dealt with it as a language system, where he denied the existence of the double articulation in the cinema, which negates the possibility of the presence of minor cinematic units in the film that enables also the morphems, as no minor cinematic units or morphems were studied, The study of morphems necessitates the study of minor units. Research importance: Studying the morphems and minor units in cinematography from a semiological approach, also the study of morphems and the minor cinematic units puts it in a par with the language and contributes more to the study of the film's linguistics. Research aim: the studying the morphems minor cinematic units in the film language that prove in finding a cinema for double articulation. Research methodology: descriptive inferential.https://mjaf.journals.ekb.eg/article_137278.htmlf.no; phonemes; cinemes; unites of light; color
collection DOAJ
language Arabic
format Article
sources DOAJ
author sawsan amer
spellingShingle sawsan amer
Morphems in Language and Cinematography (Semiotic Approach)
Journal of Architecture, Art & Humanistic Science
f.no; phonemes; cinemes; unites of light; color
author_facet sawsan amer
author_sort sawsan amer
title Morphems in Language and Cinematography (Semiotic Approach)
title_short Morphems in Language and Cinematography (Semiotic Approach)
title_full Morphems in Language and Cinematography (Semiotic Approach)
title_fullStr Morphems in Language and Cinematography (Semiotic Approach)
title_full_unstemmed Morphems in Language and Cinematography (Semiotic Approach)
title_sort morphems in language and cinematography (semiotic approach)
publisher Arab Association for Islamic Civilization and Art
series Journal of Architecture, Art & Humanistic Science
issn 2356-9654
2357-0342
publishDate 2021-09-01
description Numerous studies of cinematic semiology in the 1960s dealt with issues related to basic units of meaning “morphems”, double articulation, levels of meaning and minor units, which were attempts by pioneers in this field to find equivalences between units of language and film. The term double articulation appeared in the movie message, which can be divided into unites that carry the meaning in which are the morphems, which arise directly by studying the smaller unit. Metz mentioned in his interpretation of the universality of cinema two aspects: visual perception is less diverse in the world than the diversity of languages, and that cinema has no double articulation. Research problem: is one of the most important pioneers in the field of film Semiology, Metz was not inclined to interpret cinema as a language but rather dealt with it as a language system, where he denied the existence of the double articulation in the cinema, which negates the possibility of the presence of minor cinematic units in the film that enables also the morphems, as no minor cinematic units or morphems were studied, The study of morphems necessitates the study of minor units. Research importance: Studying the morphems and minor units in cinematography from a semiological approach, also the study of morphems and the minor cinematic units puts it in a par with the language and contributes more to the study of the film's linguistics. Research aim: the studying the morphems minor cinematic units in the film language that prove in finding a cinema for double articulation. Research methodology: descriptive inferential.
topic f.no; phonemes; cinemes; unites of light; color
url https://mjaf.journals.ekb.eg/article_137278.html
work_keys_str_mv AT sawsanamer morphemsinlanguageandcinematographysemioticapproach
_version_ 1716849229143474176