A Study of using AHP Method to Evaluate the Criteria and Attribute of Defects in Heritage Building

This paper examines the criteria and attributes for assessing defects in a heritage building. The goal of this paper is to solve element type for building defects by using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). A survey questionnaire was develop based on the identified criteria and attributes of defe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zuraidi Siti Nor Fatimah, Rahman Mohammad Ashraf Abdul, Akasah Zainal Abidin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2018-01-01
Series:E3S Web of Conferences
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20186501002
id doaj-194f5e21b3a247b2b5bfeb6e4d818be1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-194f5e21b3a247b2b5bfeb6e4d818be12021-02-02T00:30:46ZengEDP SciencesE3S Web of Conferences2267-12422018-01-01650100210.1051/e3sconf/20186501002e3sconf_iccee2018_01002A Study of using AHP Method to Evaluate the Criteria and Attribute of Defects in Heritage BuildingZuraidi Siti Nor FatimahRahman Mohammad Ashraf AbdulAkasah Zainal AbidinThis paper examines the criteria and attributes for assessing defects in a heritage building. The goal of this paper is to solve element type for building defects by using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). A survey questionnaire was develop based on the identified criteria and attributes of defect for a heritage building in Malaysia. The survey questionnaire was administered to consultants, academics, and contractors. A total of 20 expert panels was selected to determine the element of the defect in building performance. The sensitivity analysis of alternative ratings in respect to difference pairwise comparisons of the criteria and attribute was carried out. By changing one element in the pairwise comparison matrix, the process of defect element is monitored thus enabling possible improvements. An overall ranking of the Hierarchy priorities of criteria and attribute was a result of the AHP analysis. The result of the research is weightage for each criterion and its respective attributes. The criteria and attributes will be used as elements to develop a strategic heritage building performance procedure in Malaysia.https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20186501002
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Zuraidi Siti Nor Fatimah
Rahman Mohammad Ashraf Abdul
Akasah Zainal Abidin
spellingShingle Zuraidi Siti Nor Fatimah
Rahman Mohammad Ashraf Abdul
Akasah Zainal Abidin
A Study of using AHP Method to Evaluate the Criteria and Attribute of Defects in Heritage Building
E3S Web of Conferences
author_facet Zuraidi Siti Nor Fatimah
Rahman Mohammad Ashraf Abdul
Akasah Zainal Abidin
author_sort Zuraidi Siti Nor Fatimah
title A Study of using AHP Method to Evaluate the Criteria and Attribute of Defects in Heritage Building
title_short A Study of using AHP Method to Evaluate the Criteria and Attribute of Defects in Heritage Building
title_full A Study of using AHP Method to Evaluate the Criteria and Attribute of Defects in Heritage Building
title_fullStr A Study of using AHP Method to Evaluate the Criteria and Attribute of Defects in Heritage Building
title_full_unstemmed A Study of using AHP Method to Evaluate the Criteria and Attribute of Defects in Heritage Building
title_sort study of using ahp method to evaluate the criteria and attribute of defects in heritage building
publisher EDP Sciences
series E3S Web of Conferences
issn 2267-1242
publishDate 2018-01-01
description This paper examines the criteria and attributes for assessing defects in a heritage building. The goal of this paper is to solve element type for building defects by using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). A survey questionnaire was develop based on the identified criteria and attributes of defect for a heritage building in Malaysia. The survey questionnaire was administered to consultants, academics, and contractors. A total of 20 expert panels was selected to determine the element of the defect in building performance. The sensitivity analysis of alternative ratings in respect to difference pairwise comparisons of the criteria and attribute was carried out. By changing one element in the pairwise comparison matrix, the process of defect element is monitored thus enabling possible improvements. An overall ranking of the Hierarchy priorities of criteria and attribute was a result of the AHP analysis. The result of the research is weightage for each criterion and its respective attributes. The criteria and attributes will be used as elements to develop a strategic heritage building performance procedure in Malaysia.
url https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20186501002
work_keys_str_mv AT zuraidisitinorfatimah astudyofusingahpmethodtoevaluatethecriteriaandattributeofdefectsinheritagebuilding
AT rahmanmohammadashrafabdul astudyofusingahpmethodtoevaluatethecriteriaandattributeofdefectsinheritagebuilding
AT akasahzainalabidin astudyofusingahpmethodtoevaluatethecriteriaandattributeofdefectsinheritagebuilding
AT zuraidisitinorfatimah studyofusingahpmethodtoevaluatethecriteriaandattributeofdefectsinheritagebuilding
AT rahmanmohammadashrafabdul studyofusingahpmethodtoevaluatethecriteriaandattributeofdefectsinheritagebuilding
AT akasahzainalabidin studyofusingahpmethodtoevaluatethecriteriaandattributeofdefectsinheritagebuilding
_version_ 1724313573742608384