The European Union and minority languages: Evolution, achievements and contradictions in the light of the Treaty of Lisbon

The issue of minorities has long been perceived as an obstacle to European integration. This paper seeks to unravel the complex nature of minority language (ML) policy in the European Union (EU), arguing that a long way has been travelled since 1981. From that moment onwards, the European Parliament...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lorenzo Piccoli
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Università del Salento 2011-02-01
Series:Interdisciplinary Political Studies
Online Access:http://www.idps.unisi.it/file_download/4/EUMinorityLanguages.pdf
id doaj-19465f6e01d94d50a858b4151c33ffff
record_format Article
spelling doaj-19465f6e01d94d50a858b4151c33ffff2020-11-25T02:50:00ZengUniversità del SalentoInterdisciplinary Political Studies2039-85732011-02-01102030The European Union and minority languages: Evolution, achievements and contradictions in the light of the Treaty of LisbonLorenzo PiccoliThe issue of minorities has long been perceived as an obstacle to European integration. This paper seeks to unravel the complex nature of minority language (ML) policy in the European Union (EU), arguing that a long way has been travelled since 1981. From that moment onwards, the European Parliament (EP) began dealing with minority issues starting from the functional area of minority languages (MLs). This has led to two outcomes: on the one hand, with the Treaty of Lisbon (ToL) the EU has finally adopted a more embracing notion of minority rights, recognizing linguistic diversity and the protection of the persons belonging to minorities as part of its fundamental values; on the other hand, the European Commission is increasingly active in supporting the promotion of ML through financial programmes. This is evidence that ML policy at the European level, complementary to those of the single Member States, is very fragmented and barely structured, but still effective in so far as it legally protects and financially supports ML.http://www.idps.unisi.it/file_download/4/EUMinorityLanguages.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lorenzo Piccoli
spellingShingle Lorenzo Piccoli
The European Union and minority languages: Evolution, achievements and contradictions in the light of the Treaty of Lisbon
Interdisciplinary Political Studies
author_facet Lorenzo Piccoli
author_sort Lorenzo Piccoli
title The European Union and minority languages: Evolution, achievements and contradictions in the light of the Treaty of Lisbon
title_short The European Union and minority languages: Evolution, achievements and contradictions in the light of the Treaty of Lisbon
title_full The European Union and minority languages: Evolution, achievements and contradictions in the light of the Treaty of Lisbon
title_fullStr The European Union and minority languages: Evolution, achievements and contradictions in the light of the Treaty of Lisbon
title_full_unstemmed The European Union and minority languages: Evolution, achievements and contradictions in the light of the Treaty of Lisbon
title_sort european union and minority languages: evolution, achievements and contradictions in the light of the treaty of lisbon
publisher Università del Salento
series Interdisciplinary Political Studies
issn 2039-8573
publishDate 2011-02-01
description The issue of minorities has long been perceived as an obstacle to European integration. This paper seeks to unravel the complex nature of minority language (ML) policy in the European Union (EU), arguing that a long way has been travelled since 1981. From that moment onwards, the European Parliament (EP) began dealing with minority issues starting from the functional area of minority languages (MLs). This has led to two outcomes: on the one hand, with the Treaty of Lisbon (ToL) the EU has finally adopted a more embracing notion of minority rights, recognizing linguistic diversity and the protection of the persons belonging to minorities as part of its fundamental values; on the other hand, the European Commission is increasingly active in supporting the promotion of ML through financial programmes. This is evidence that ML policy at the European level, complementary to those of the single Member States, is very fragmented and barely structured, but still effective in so far as it legally protects and financially supports ML.
url http://www.idps.unisi.it/file_download/4/EUMinorityLanguages.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT lorenzopiccoli theeuropeanunionandminoritylanguagesevolutionachievementsandcontradictionsinthelightofthetreatyoflisbon
AT lorenzopiccoli europeanunionandminoritylanguagesevolutionachievementsandcontradictionsinthelightofthetreatyoflisbon
_version_ 1724740864070123520