Evolution of the collective radiation dose of nuclear reactors from the 2nd through to the 3rd generation and 4th generation sodium-cooled fast reactors
During the operation of a nuclear reactor, the external individual doses received by the personnel are measured and recorded, in conformity with the regulations in force. The sum of these measurements enables an evaluation of the annual collective dose expressed in man·Sv/year. This information is a...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
EDP Sciences
2017-01-01
|
Series: | EPJ Nuclear Sciences & Technologies |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1051/epjn/2017024 |
id |
doaj-194364ed023847e796ca9ba0fdde5fcd |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-194364ed023847e796ca9ba0fdde5fcd2021-02-02T01:02:06ZengEDP SciencesEPJ Nuclear Sciences & Technologies2491-92922017-01-0133210.1051/epjn/2017024epjn170006Evolution of the collective radiation dose of nuclear reactors from the 2nd through to the 3rd generation and 4th generation sodium-cooled fast reactorsGuidez JoelSaturnin AnneDuring the operation of a nuclear reactor, the external individual doses received by the personnel are measured and recorded, in conformity with the regulations in force. The sum of these measurements enables an evaluation of the annual collective dose expressed in man·Sv/year. This information is a useful tool when comparing the different design types and reactors. This article discusses the evolution of the collective dose for several types of reactors, mainly based on publications from the NEA and the IAEA. The spread of good practices (optimization of working conditions and of the organization, sharing of lessons learned, etc.) and ongoing improvements in reactor design have meant that over time, the doses of various origins received by the personnel have decreased. In the case of sodium-cooled fast reactors (SFRs), the compilation and summarizing of various documentary resources has enabled them to be situated and compared to other types of reactors of the second and third generations (respectively pressurized water reactors in operation and EPR under construction). From these results, it can be seen that the doses received during the operation of SFR are significantly lower for this type of reactor.https://doi.org/10.1051/epjn/2017024 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Guidez Joel Saturnin Anne |
spellingShingle |
Guidez Joel Saturnin Anne Evolution of the collective radiation dose of nuclear reactors from the 2nd through to the 3rd generation and 4th generation sodium-cooled fast reactors EPJ Nuclear Sciences & Technologies |
author_facet |
Guidez Joel Saturnin Anne |
author_sort |
Guidez Joel |
title |
Evolution of the collective radiation dose of nuclear reactors from the 2nd through to the 3rd generation and 4th generation sodium-cooled fast reactors |
title_short |
Evolution of the collective radiation dose of nuclear reactors from the 2nd through to the 3rd generation and 4th generation sodium-cooled fast reactors |
title_full |
Evolution of the collective radiation dose of nuclear reactors from the 2nd through to the 3rd generation and 4th generation sodium-cooled fast reactors |
title_fullStr |
Evolution of the collective radiation dose of nuclear reactors from the 2nd through to the 3rd generation and 4th generation sodium-cooled fast reactors |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evolution of the collective radiation dose of nuclear reactors from the 2nd through to the 3rd generation and 4th generation sodium-cooled fast reactors |
title_sort |
evolution of the collective radiation dose of nuclear reactors from the 2nd through to the 3rd generation and 4th generation sodium-cooled fast reactors |
publisher |
EDP Sciences |
series |
EPJ Nuclear Sciences & Technologies |
issn |
2491-9292 |
publishDate |
2017-01-01 |
description |
During the operation of a nuclear reactor, the external individual doses received by the personnel are measured and recorded, in conformity with the regulations in force. The sum of these measurements enables an evaluation of the annual collective dose expressed in man·Sv/year. This information is a useful tool when comparing the different design types and reactors. This article discusses the evolution of the collective dose for several types of reactors, mainly based on publications from the NEA and the IAEA.
The spread of good practices (optimization of working conditions and of the organization, sharing of lessons learned, etc.) and ongoing improvements in reactor design have meant that over time, the doses of various origins received by the personnel have decreased.
In the case of sodium-cooled fast reactors (SFRs), the compilation and summarizing of various documentary resources has enabled them to be situated and compared to other types of reactors of the second and third generations (respectively pressurized water reactors in operation and EPR under construction). From these results, it can be seen that the doses received during the operation of SFR are significantly lower for this type of reactor. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1051/epjn/2017024 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT guidezjoel evolutionofthecollectiveradiationdoseofnuclearreactorsfromthe2ndthroughtothe3rdgenerationand4thgenerationsodiumcooledfastreactors AT saturninanne evolutionofthecollectiveradiationdoseofnuclearreactorsfromthe2ndthroughtothe3rdgenerationand4thgenerationsodiumcooledfastreactors |
_version_ |
1724312466449498112 |