The Role of Edaphic and Vegetation Factors in Structuring Beta Diversity of the Soil Macrofauna Community of the Dnipro River Arena Terrace

The article presents the results of evaluation of the role of edaphic and vegetation factors on beta diversity of soil macrofauna by means of the MDM-approach. The multinomial diversity model (MDM) is a method for relating the Shannon diversity to ecological factors. The research was conducted in th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhukov Olexander, Kunah Olga, Dubinina Yulia, Novikova Victoria
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2018-12-01
Series:Ekológia (Bratislava)
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2478/eko-2018-0023
id doaj-193ceaaf5e52443a89dc805d04f6c824
record_format Article
spelling doaj-193ceaaf5e52443a89dc805d04f6c8242021-09-05T21:00:47ZengSciendoEkológia (Bratislava)1337-947X2018-12-0137430132710.2478/eko-2018-0023eko-2018-0023The Role of Edaphic and Vegetation Factors in Structuring Beta Diversity of the Soil Macrofauna Community of the Dnipro River Arena TerraceZhukov Olexander0Kunah Olga1Dubinina Yulia2Novikova Victoria3Department of Zoology and Ecology, Oles Honchar Dnipro National University, pr. Gagarina, 72, 49010Dnipro, UkraineDepartment of Zoology and Ecology, Oles Honchar Dnipro National University, pr. Gagarina, 72, 49010Dnipro, UkraineDepartment of Ecology and Information Technologies, Melitopol Institute of Ecology and Social Technologies of the Open International University of Human Development ‘Ukraine’, Interculturnaya St., 380, 72316Melitopol, UkraineDepartment of Zoology and Ecology, Oles Honchar Dnipro National University, pr. Gagarina, 72, 49010Dnipro, UkraineThe article presents the results of evaluation of the role of edaphic and vegetation factors on beta diversity of soil macrofauna by means of the MDM-approach. The multinomial diversity model (MDM) is a method for relating the Shannon diversity to ecological factors. The research was conducted in the ‘Dnipro-Orils’kiy’ Nature Reserve (Ukraine). The research polygon was laid in the forest within the Orlova ravine (48º31’13 “N, 34º48”15 “E). The study site comprises 1.0 ha of deciduous woodland bordered by an area of herbaceous cover within the ravine. In the soil of the studied polygon, 38 species of soil invertebrates were identified, which characterizes the gamma diversity. Alpha diversity, or the number of species on average at each sample point is 4.3. Beta diversity is 8.8. The principal component analysis of the edaphic parameters revealed four statistically significant principal components. For vegetation characteristics, six statistically significant principal components were identified. The sequential analysis of the effects shows that edaphic factors accounted for 20.9% (0.81 bit) of the available entropy (1.71–0.91). The largest decrease in the community entropy takes place under the action of the principal components 2 and 3 (0.06 bit and 0.05, respectively). A permutation test showed that these effects are statistically significant. In turn, 28.4% of the community β-diversity is attributable to vegetation factors. The greatest decrease in community entropy is related to the principal vegetation components 1, 3 and 4 (0.07, 0.05 and 0.04 bits, respectively). A permutation test indicated that this effect is statistically reliable. Geostatistical models substantially describe the varying effects on the beta-diversity of edaphic principal components 1 and 2, and the vegetation principal components 1 and 3. It was found that edaphic and plant factors play an important role in structuring the communities of soil macrofauna on the level of beta diversity. Community sensitivity to environmental factors varies in space and is spatially structured. For different environmental factors, specific spatial patterns of community sensitivity are allocated. Beta diversity may be due to the fact that the species of soil macrofauna communities also vary in the degree of sensitivity to various environmental factors. The species of soil microfauna are also divided according to their extent of sensitivity to different ecological factors.https://doi.org/10.2478/eko-2018-0023diversityecological factorsspatial patternsvariogrammattern model
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Zhukov Olexander
Kunah Olga
Dubinina Yulia
Novikova Victoria
spellingShingle Zhukov Olexander
Kunah Olga
Dubinina Yulia
Novikova Victoria
The Role of Edaphic and Vegetation Factors in Structuring Beta Diversity of the Soil Macrofauna Community of the Dnipro River Arena Terrace
Ekológia (Bratislava)
diversity
ecological factors
spatial patterns
variogram
mattern model
author_facet Zhukov Olexander
Kunah Olga
Dubinina Yulia
Novikova Victoria
author_sort Zhukov Olexander
title The Role of Edaphic and Vegetation Factors in Structuring Beta Diversity of the Soil Macrofauna Community of the Dnipro River Arena Terrace
title_short The Role of Edaphic and Vegetation Factors in Structuring Beta Diversity of the Soil Macrofauna Community of the Dnipro River Arena Terrace
title_full The Role of Edaphic and Vegetation Factors in Structuring Beta Diversity of the Soil Macrofauna Community of the Dnipro River Arena Terrace
title_fullStr The Role of Edaphic and Vegetation Factors in Structuring Beta Diversity of the Soil Macrofauna Community of the Dnipro River Arena Terrace
title_full_unstemmed The Role of Edaphic and Vegetation Factors in Structuring Beta Diversity of the Soil Macrofauna Community of the Dnipro River Arena Terrace
title_sort role of edaphic and vegetation factors in structuring beta diversity of the soil macrofauna community of the dnipro river arena terrace
publisher Sciendo
series Ekológia (Bratislava)
issn 1337-947X
publishDate 2018-12-01
description The article presents the results of evaluation of the role of edaphic and vegetation factors on beta diversity of soil macrofauna by means of the MDM-approach. The multinomial diversity model (MDM) is a method for relating the Shannon diversity to ecological factors. The research was conducted in the ‘Dnipro-Orils’kiy’ Nature Reserve (Ukraine). The research polygon was laid in the forest within the Orlova ravine (48º31’13 “N, 34º48”15 “E). The study site comprises 1.0 ha of deciduous woodland bordered by an area of herbaceous cover within the ravine. In the soil of the studied polygon, 38 species of soil invertebrates were identified, which characterizes the gamma diversity. Alpha diversity, or the number of species on average at each sample point is 4.3. Beta diversity is 8.8. The principal component analysis of the edaphic parameters revealed four statistically significant principal components. For vegetation characteristics, six statistically significant principal components were identified. The sequential analysis of the effects shows that edaphic factors accounted for 20.9% (0.81 bit) of the available entropy (1.71–0.91). The largest decrease in the community entropy takes place under the action of the principal components 2 and 3 (0.06 bit and 0.05, respectively). A permutation test showed that these effects are statistically significant. In turn, 28.4% of the community β-diversity is attributable to vegetation factors. The greatest decrease in community entropy is related to the principal vegetation components 1, 3 and 4 (0.07, 0.05 and 0.04 bits, respectively). A permutation test indicated that this effect is statistically reliable. Geostatistical models substantially describe the varying effects on the beta-diversity of edaphic principal components 1 and 2, and the vegetation principal components 1 and 3. It was found that edaphic and plant factors play an important role in structuring the communities of soil macrofauna on the level of beta diversity. Community sensitivity to environmental factors varies in space and is spatially structured. For different environmental factors, specific spatial patterns of community sensitivity are allocated. Beta diversity may be due to the fact that the species of soil macrofauna communities also vary in the degree of sensitivity to various environmental factors. The species of soil microfauna are also divided according to their extent of sensitivity to different ecological factors.
topic diversity
ecological factors
spatial patterns
variogram
mattern model
url https://doi.org/10.2478/eko-2018-0023
work_keys_str_mv AT zhukovolexander theroleofedaphicandvegetationfactorsinstructuringbetadiversityofthesoilmacrofaunacommunityofthedniproriverarenaterrace
AT kunaholga theroleofedaphicandvegetationfactorsinstructuringbetadiversityofthesoilmacrofaunacommunityofthedniproriverarenaterrace
AT dubininayulia theroleofedaphicandvegetationfactorsinstructuringbetadiversityofthesoilmacrofaunacommunityofthedniproriverarenaterrace
AT novikovavictoria theroleofedaphicandvegetationfactorsinstructuringbetadiversityofthesoilmacrofaunacommunityofthedniproriverarenaterrace
AT zhukovolexander roleofedaphicandvegetationfactorsinstructuringbetadiversityofthesoilmacrofaunacommunityofthedniproriverarenaterrace
AT kunaholga roleofedaphicandvegetationfactorsinstructuringbetadiversityofthesoilmacrofaunacommunityofthedniproriverarenaterrace
AT dubininayulia roleofedaphicandvegetationfactorsinstructuringbetadiversityofthesoilmacrofaunacommunityofthedniproriverarenaterrace
AT novikovavictoria roleofedaphicandvegetationfactorsinstructuringbetadiversityofthesoilmacrofaunacommunityofthedniproriverarenaterrace
_version_ 1717782240725827584