Urban (Un)Sustainability: Cases of Vilnius’s Informal and Illegal Settings

The current analysis addresses cases of both informal and illegal settlements in Vilnius, Lithuania. By using semiotic means (specifically, semiotic squares), the author presents the Romani district (<i>tabors</i>), as well the &#352;nipi&#353;kės district, describing the circums...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tomas Kačerauskas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-12-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/12/4615
id doaj-19349cca47034ec2a2a1938633d79775
record_format Article
spelling doaj-19349cca47034ec2a2a1938633d797752020-11-24T22:10:44ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502018-12-011012461510.3390/su10124615su10124615Urban (Un)Sustainability: Cases of Vilnius’s Informal and Illegal SettingsTomas Kačerauskas0Department of Philosophy and Cultural Studies, Faculty of Creative Industries, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, 10221 Vilnius, LithuaniaThe current analysis addresses cases of both informal and illegal settlements in Vilnius, Lithuania. By using semiotic means (specifically, semiotic squares), the author presents the Romani district (<i>tabors</i>), as well the &#352;nipi&#353;kės district, describing the circumstances of their emerging and comparing these cases. In addition to that, the philosophical questions about the dichotomies &#8216;formal/informal&#8217;, &#8216;temporal/eternal&#8217;, &#8216;order/chaos&#8217;, &#8216;legal/illegal&#8217;, &#8216;sustainable/unsustainable&#8217; are discussed. On the one hand, illegal buildings serve as a signal about too high a barrier of bureaucracy, about a surfeit of law and even about the violation of certain rights. On the other hand, some urban districts can become illegal because of a changed urban vision reflected in a new General Plan. The paper also analyzes the issue of public interest. Additionally, the tendency of democratic society to turn into bureaucratic society is analyzed. The paper addresses sensitive issues related to sustainable development of cities, intercultural dialogue and equal opportunities.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/12/4615informal settingsurban sustainabilitysocial minoritysemiotic squareurban development
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tomas Kačerauskas
spellingShingle Tomas Kačerauskas
Urban (Un)Sustainability: Cases of Vilnius’s Informal and Illegal Settings
Sustainability
informal settings
urban sustainability
social minority
semiotic square
urban development
author_facet Tomas Kačerauskas
author_sort Tomas Kačerauskas
title Urban (Un)Sustainability: Cases of Vilnius’s Informal and Illegal Settings
title_short Urban (Un)Sustainability: Cases of Vilnius’s Informal and Illegal Settings
title_full Urban (Un)Sustainability: Cases of Vilnius’s Informal and Illegal Settings
title_fullStr Urban (Un)Sustainability: Cases of Vilnius’s Informal and Illegal Settings
title_full_unstemmed Urban (Un)Sustainability: Cases of Vilnius’s Informal and Illegal Settings
title_sort urban (un)sustainability: cases of vilnius’s informal and illegal settings
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2018-12-01
description The current analysis addresses cases of both informal and illegal settlements in Vilnius, Lithuania. By using semiotic means (specifically, semiotic squares), the author presents the Romani district (<i>tabors</i>), as well the &#352;nipi&#353;kės district, describing the circumstances of their emerging and comparing these cases. In addition to that, the philosophical questions about the dichotomies &#8216;formal/informal&#8217;, &#8216;temporal/eternal&#8217;, &#8216;order/chaos&#8217;, &#8216;legal/illegal&#8217;, &#8216;sustainable/unsustainable&#8217; are discussed. On the one hand, illegal buildings serve as a signal about too high a barrier of bureaucracy, about a surfeit of law and even about the violation of certain rights. On the other hand, some urban districts can become illegal because of a changed urban vision reflected in a new General Plan. The paper also analyzes the issue of public interest. Additionally, the tendency of democratic society to turn into bureaucratic society is analyzed. The paper addresses sensitive issues related to sustainable development of cities, intercultural dialogue and equal opportunities.
topic informal settings
urban sustainability
social minority
semiotic square
urban development
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/12/4615
work_keys_str_mv AT tomaskacerauskas urbanunsustainabilitycasesofvilniussinformalandillegalsettings
_version_ 1725806968978800640