Aesthetic Engagement, Ecosophy C, and Ecological Appreciation

With the aim of healing the earth and sustain a healthy ecosystem for all life forms, not humankind alone, ecoaesthetics emerges as a critique of Enlightenment mentality and of modern aesthetics as it is embodied in it. This mentality contributes greatly to the global ecological crisis and to other...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Cheng Xiangzhan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Contemporary Aesthetics, Inc. 2013-01-01
Series:Contemporary Aesthetics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.contempaesthetics.org/newvolume/pages/article.php?articleID=680
id doaj-192633e2ad154c9b888f5928e81cefc9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-192633e2ad154c9b888f5928e81cefc92020-11-24T22:52:49ZengContemporary Aesthetics, Inc.Contemporary Aesthetics1932-84781932-84782013-01-0111 Aesthetic Engagement, Ecosophy C, and Ecological Appreciation Cheng XiangzhanWith the aim of healing the earth and sustain a healthy ecosystem for all life forms, not humankind alone, ecoaesthetics emerges as a critique of Enlightenment mentality and of modern aesthetics as it is embodied in it. This mentality contributes greatly to the global ecological crisis and to other problem areas, such as population, economic, political and religious ones. In my understanding of aesthetics, ecoaesthetics is defined as the theory of ecological aesthetic appreciation.[1] With ecoaesthetics as my research horizon, there are at least two reasons for me to pay special attention to American philosopher Arnold Berleant’s conception of aesthetic engagement and his aesthetic theory based on it, an aesthetics of engagement. The first is our shared theme, which is the critique of modern aesthetics. The second reason is more complex for it involves the crucial question of the proper manner of aesthetic appreciation. From the perspective of ecoaesthetics, the contemplation of objects by a separated perceiver, an approach that is based on the modern philosophical dualism of subject and object, is unsatisfactory and inadequate. Berleant’s aesthetic engagement is a more satisfactory account of appreciation that is aesthetic and ecological. This emphasizes the ecological continuity or interrelatedness between the human appreciator and objects. Of course, any theory can occasion critique and development. Based on Berleant’s idea of aesthetic engagement, I would like to propose Ecosophy C. This can be contrasted with Ecosophy T proposed by the Norwegian, Arne Naess, and with traditional Chinese aesthetic wisdom. In contrast with these, I would like to develop my own view of ecological understanding. In order to construct a more comprehensive and reasonable ecoaesthetics, my Ecosophy C contains eight points that are crucial in building an ecological model of aesthetic appreciation for this period of ecological crisis. http://www.contempaesthetics.org/newvolume/pages/article.php?articleID=680aesthetic engagement
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Cheng Xiangzhan
spellingShingle Cheng Xiangzhan
Aesthetic Engagement, Ecosophy C, and Ecological Appreciation
Contemporary Aesthetics
aesthetic engagement
author_facet Cheng Xiangzhan
author_sort Cheng Xiangzhan
title Aesthetic Engagement, Ecosophy C, and Ecological Appreciation
title_short Aesthetic Engagement, Ecosophy C, and Ecological Appreciation
title_full Aesthetic Engagement, Ecosophy C, and Ecological Appreciation
title_fullStr Aesthetic Engagement, Ecosophy C, and Ecological Appreciation
title_full_unstemmed Aesthetic Engagement, Ecosophy C, and Ecological Appreciation
title_sort aesthetic engagement, ecosophy c, and ecological appreciation
publisher Contemporary Aesthetics, Inc.
series Contemporary Aesthetics
issn 1932-8478
1932-8478
publishDate 2013-01-01
description With the aim of healing the earth and sustain a healthy ecosystem for all life forms, not humankind alone, ecoaesthetics emerges as a critique of Enlightenment mentality and of modern aesthetics as it is embodied in it. This mentality contributes greatly to the global ecological crisis and to other problem areas, such as population, economic, political and religious ones. In my understanding of aesthetics, ecoaesthetics is defined as the theory of ecological aesthetic appreciation.[1] With ecoaesthetics as my research horizon, there are at least two reasons for me to pay special attention to American philosopher Arnold Berleant’s conception of aesthetic engagement and his aesthetic theory based on it, an aesthetics of engagement. The first is our shared theme, which is the critique of modern aesthetics. The second reason is more complex for it involves the crucial question of the proper manner of aesthetic appreciation. From the perspective of ecoaesthetics, the contemplation of objects by a separated perceiver, an approach that is based on the modern philosophical dualism of subject and object, is unsatisfactory and inadequate. Berleant’s aesthetic engagement is a more satisfactory account of appreciation that is aesthetic and ecological. This emphasizes the ecological continuity or interrelatedness between the human appreciator and objects. Of course, any theory can occasion critique and development. Based on Berleant’s idea of aesthetic engagement, I would like to propose Ecosophy C. This can be contrasted with Ecosophy T proposed by the Norwegian, Arne Naess, and with traditional Chinese aesthetic wisdom. In contrast with these, I would like to develop my own view of ecological understanding. In order to construct a more comprehensive and reasonable ecoaesthetics, my Ecosophy C contains eight points that are crucial in building an ecological model of aesthetic appreciation for this period of ecological crisis.
topic aesthetic engagement
url http://www.contempaesthetics.org/newvolume/pages/article.php?articleID=680
work_keys_str_mv AT chengxiangzhan aestheticengagementecosophycandecologicalappreciation
_version_ 1725664389355274240