Aesthetic Engagement, Ecosophy C, and Ecological Appreciation
With the aim of healing the earth and sustain a healthy ecosystem for all life forms, not humankind alone, ecoaesthetics emerges as a critique of Enlightenment mentality and of modern aesthetics as it is embodied in it. This mentality contributes greatly to the global ecological crisis and to other...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Contemporary Aesthetics, Inc.
2013-01-01
|
Series: | Contemporary Aesthetics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.contempaesthetics.org/newvolume/pages/article.php?articleID=680 |
id |
doaj-192633e2ad154c9b888f5928e81cefc9 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-192633e2ad154c9b888f5928e81cefc92020-11-24T22:52:49ZengContemporary Aesthetics, Inc.Contemporary Aesthetics1932-84781932-84782013-01-0111 Aesthetic Engagement, Ecosophy C, and Ecological Appreciation Cheng XiangzhanWith the aim of healing the earth and sustain a healthy ecosystem for all life forms, not humankind alone, ecoaesthetics emerges as a critique of Enlightenment mentality and of modern aesthetics as it is embodied in it. This mentality contributes greatly to the global ecological crisis and to other problem areas, such as population, economic, political and religious ones. In my understanding of aesthetics, ecoaesthetics is defined as the theory of ecological aesthetic appreciation.[1] With ecoaesthetics as my research horizon, there are at least two reasons for me to pay special attention to American philosopher Arnold Berleant’s conception of aesthetic engagement and his aesthetic theory based on it, an aesthetics of engagement. The first is our shared theme, which is the critique of modern aesthetics. The second reason is more complex for it involves the crucial question of the proper manner of aesthetic appreciation. From the perspective of ecoaesthetics, the contemplation of objects by a separated perceiver, an approach that is based on the modern philosophical dualism of subject and object, is unsatisfactory and inadequate. Berleant’s aesthetic engagement is a more satisfactory account of appreciation that is aesthetic and ecological. This emphasizes the ecological continuity or interrelatedness between the human appreciator and objects. Of course, any theory can occasion critique and development. Based on Berleant’s idea of aesthetic engagement, I would like to propose Ecosophy C. This can be contrasted with Ecosophy T proposed by the Norwegian, Arne Naess, and with traditional Chinese aesthetic wisdom. In contrast with these, I would like to develop my own view of ecological understanding. In order to construct a more comprehensive and reasonable ecoaesthetics, my Ecosophy C contains eight points that are crucial in building an ecological model of aesthetic appreciation for this period of ecological crisis. http://www.contempaesthetics.org/newvolume/pages/article.php?articleID=680aesthetic engagement |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Cheng Xiangzhan |
spellingShingle |
Cheng Xiangzhan Aesthetic Engagement, Ecosophy C, and Ecological Appreciation Contemporary Aesthetics aesthetic engagement |
author_facet |
Cheng Xiangzhan |
author_sort |
Cheng Xiangzhan |
title |
Aesthetic Engagement, Ecosophy C, and Ecological Appreciation |
title_short |
Aesthetic Engagement, Ecosophy C, and Ecological Appreciation |
title_full |
Aesthetic Engagement, Ecosophy C, and Ecological Appreciation |
title_fullStr |
Aesthetic Engagement, Ecosophy C, and Ecological Appreciation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Aesthetic Engagement, Ecosophy C, and Ecological Appreciation |
title_sort |
aesthetic engagement, ecosophy c, and ecological appreciation |
publisher |
Contemporary Aesthetics, Inc. |
series |
Contemporary Aesthetics |
issn |
1932-8478 1932-8478 |
publishDate |
2013-01-01 |
description |
With the aim of healing the earth and sustain a healthy ecosystem for all life forms, not humankind alone, ecoaesthetics emerges as a critique of Enlightenment mentality and of modern aesthetics as it is embodied in it. This mentality contributes greatly to the global ecological crisis and to other problem areas, such as population, economic, political and religious ones. In my understanding of aesthetics, ecoaesthetics is defined as the theory of ecological aesthetic appreciation.[1]
With ecoaesthetics as my research horizon, there are at least two reasons for me to pay special attention to American philosopher Arnold Berleant’s conception of aesthetic engagement and his aesthetic theory based on it, an aesthetics of engagement. The first is our shared theme, which is the critique of modern aesthetics. The second reason is more complex for it involves the crucial question of the proper manner of aesthetic appreciation. From the perspective of ecoaesthetics, the contemplation of objects by a separated perceiver, an approach that is based on the modern philosophical dualism of subject and object, is unsatisfactory and inadequate. Berleant’s aesthetic engagement is a more satisfactory account of appreciation that is aesthetic and ecological. This emphasizes the ecological continuity or interrelatedness between the human appreciator and objects.
Of course, any theory can occasion critique and development. Based on Berleant’s idea of aesthetic engagement, I would like to propose Ecosophy C. This can be contrasted with Ecosophy T proposed by the Norwegian, Arne Naess, and with traditional Chinese aesthetic wisdom. In contrast with these, I would like to develop my own view of ecological understanding. In order to construct a more comprehensive and reasonable ecoaesthetics, my Ecosophy C contains eight points that are crucial in building an ecological model of aesthetic appreciation for this period of ecological crisis. |
topic |
aesthetic engagement |
url |
http://www.contempaesthetics.org/newvolume/pages/article.php?articleID=680 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT chengxiangzhan aestheticengagementecosophycandecologicalappreciation |
_version_ |
1725664389355274240 |