Is Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing Coming out on Top? A Comparison with Activity-Based Costing in the Health Field

The cost of health is a recurrent topic that has generated much research, as it affects all of society. Both public and private agents need to know the real cost of treatments, services, and products for decision-making. This article aims to compare the use and research impact of two cost systems wi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Angels Niñerola, Ana-Beatriz Hernández-Lara, Maria-Victoria Sánchez-Rebull
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-08-01
Series:Healthcare
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/9/9/1113
id doaj-191b6ce9bdac4eb4b9fbb6a0453dafa5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-191b6ce9bdac4eb4b9fbb6a0453dafa52021-09-26T00:14:30ZengMDPI AGHealthcare2227-90322021-08-0191113111310.3390/healthcare9091113Is Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing Coming out on Top? A Comparison with Activity-Based Costing in the Health FieldAngels Niñerola0Ana-Beatriz Hernández-Lara1Maria-Victoria Sánchez-Rebull2Department of Business Management, Faculty of Business and Economics, University Rovira i Virgili, 43204 Reus, SpainDepartment of Business Management, Faculty of Business and Economics, University Rovira i Virgili, 43204 Reus, SpainDepartment of Business Management, Faculty of Business and Economics, University Rovira i Virgili, 43204 Reus, SpainThe cost of health is a recurrent topic that has generated much research, as it affects all of society. Both public and private agents need to know the real cost of treatments, services, and products for decision-making. This article aims to compare the use and research impact of two cost systems widely used in health: ABC and TDABC, which is an evolution of ABC. For doing so, a bibliometric review in Scopus and Medline was carried out encompassing the years 2009–2019. The results show a great increase in publications using TDABC, while publications on ABC stabilized. On the other hand, the TDABC articles presented higher research impacts in traditional and alternative metrics. Articles on TDABC are more frequently cited, published in better journals, and more visible in academic social networks. The findings suggest that scholars and practitioners should focus on TDABC rather than ABC for addressing cost in health for its simplicity, projection, and research opportunities.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/9/9/1113time-driven activity-based costingactivity-based costinghealthresearch impact
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Angels Niñerola
Ana-Beatriz Hernández-Lara
Maria-Victoria Sánchez-Rebull
spellingShingle Angels Niñerola
Ana-Beatriz Hernández-Lara
Maria-Victoria Sánchez-Rebull
Is Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing Coming out on Top? A Comparison with Activity-Based Costing in the Health Field
Healthcare
time-driven activity-based costing
activity-based costing
health
research impact
author_facet Angels Niñerola
Ana-Beatriz Hernández-Lara
Maria-Victoria Sánchez-Rebull
author_sort Angels Niñerola
title Is Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing Coming out on Top? A Comparison with Activity-Based Costing in the Health Field
title_short Is Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing Coming out on Top? A Comparison with Activity-Based Costing in the Health Field
title_full Is Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing Coming out on Top? A Comparison with Activity-Based Costing in the Health Field
title_fullStr Is Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing Coming out on Top? A Comparison with Activity-Based Costing in the Health Field
title_full_unstemmed Is Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing Coming out on Top? A Comparison with Activity-Based Costing in the Health Field
title_sort is time-driven activity-based costing coming out on top? a comparison with activity-based costing in the health field
publisher MDPI AG
series Healthcare
issn 2227-9032
publishDate 2021-08-01
description The cost of health is a recurrent topic that has generated much research, as it affects all of society. Both public and private agents need to know the real cost of treatments, services, and products for decision-making. This article aims to compare the use and research impact of two cost systems widely used in health: ABC and TDABC, which is an evolution of ABC. For doing so, a bibliometric review in Scopus and Medline was carried out encompassing the years 2009–2019. The results show a great increase in publications using TDABC, while publications on ABC stabilized. On the other hand, the TDABC articles presented higher research impacts in traditional and alternative metrics. Articles on TDABC are more frequently cited, published in better journals, and more visible in academic social networks. The findings suggest that scholars and practitioners should focus on TDABC rather than ABC for addressing cost in health for its simplicity, projection, and research opportunities.
topic time-driven activity-based costing
activity-based costing
health
research impact
url https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/9/9/1113
work_keys_str_mv AT angelsninerola istimedrivenactivitybasedcostingcomingoutontopacomparisonwithactivitybasedcostinginthehealthfield
AT anabeatrizhernandezlara istimedrivenactivitybasedcostingcomingoutontopacomparisonwithactivitybasedcostinginthehealthfield
AT mariavictoriasanchezrebull istimedrivenactivitybasedcostingcomingoutontopacomparisonwithactivitybasedcostinginthehealthfield
_version_ 1717366651648737280