The political ecology of late South American pastoralism: an Andean perspective A.D. 1,000-1,615

Prehispanic South American pastoralism has a long and rich, though often understudied, trajectory. In this paper, we analyze the transition from a generalized to a specialized pastoralism at two geographical locations in the Andes: Antofagasta de la Sierra, Southern Argentina Puna, and the Ancash Hi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jennifer L. Grant, Kevin Lane
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Arizona Libraries 2018-10-01
Series:Journal of Political Ecology
Online Access:https://journals.uair.arizona.edu/index.php/JPE/article/view/23071
id doaj-1918aa3f306140979abc82169853f154
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1918aa3f306140979abc82169853f1542020-11-25T00:13:22ZengUniversity of Arizona LibrariesJournal of Political Ecology1073-04512018-10-0125144646910.2458/v25i1.2307122310The political ecology of late South American pastoralism: an Andean perspective A.D. 1,000-1,615Jennifer L. Grant0Kevin Lane1nstituto Nacional de Antropología y Pensamiento LatinoamericanoInstituto de Arqueología, Universidad de Buenos AiresPrehispanic South American pastoralism has a long and rich, though often understudied, trajectory. In this paper, we analyze the transition from a generalized to a specialized pastoralism at two geographical locations in the Andes: Antofagasta de la Sierra, Southern Argentina Puna, and the Ancash Highlands, Peruvian North-central Puna. Although at opposite ends of the Andes this herding specialization commences during the same moment in time, A.D. 600-1,000, suggesting that a similar process was at work in both areas. Moreover, this was a process that was irrevocably tied to the coeval development of specialized highland agriculture. From a perspective of political ecology and structuration theory we emphasis the time-depth and importance that Andean pastoralism had in shaping highland landscapes. Taking into consideration risk-management theory, ecology and environment as crucial factors in the development of a specialized pastoralism we nevertheless emphasis the importance of the underlying human decisions that drove this process. Based broadly within the field of political ecology we therefore emphasize how human agency and structure impacted on these landscapes, society and animal husbandry. Our article covers such aspects as the human and animal use of resource areas, settlement location, herding patterns, selective breeding, and human-induced alterations to pasturage. Keywords: Andes, pastoralism, political ecology, Southern Andes, Central Andeshttps://journals.uair.arizona.edu/index.php/JPE/article/view/23071
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jennifer L. Grant
Kevin Lane
spellingShingle Jennifer L. Grant
Kevin Lane
The political ecology of late South American pastoralism: an Andean perspective A.D. 1,000-1,615
Journal of Political Ecology
author_facet Jennifer L. Grant
Kevin Lane
author_sort Jennifer L. Grant
title The political ecology of late South American pastoralism: an Andean perspective A.D. 1,000-1,615
title_short The political ecology of late South American pastoralism: an Andean perspective A.D. 1,000-1,615
title_full The political ecology of late South American pastoralism: an Andean perspective A.D. 1,000-1,615
title_fullStr The political ecology of late South American pastoralism: an Andean perspective A.D. 1,000-1,615
title_full_unstemmed The political ecology of late South American pastoralism: an Andean perspective A.D. 1,000-1,615
title_sort political ecology of late south american pastoralism: an andean perspective a.d. 1,000-1,615
publisher University of Arizona Libraries
series Journal of Political Ecology
issn 1073-0451
publishDate 2018-10-01
description Prehispanic South American pastoralism has a long and rich, though often understudied, trajectory. In this paper, we analyze the transition from a generalized to a specialized pastoralism at two geographical locations in the Andes: Antofagasta de la Sierra, Southern Argentina Puna, and the Ancash Highlands, Peruvian North-central Puna. Although at opposite ends of the Andes this herding specialization commences during the same moment in time, A.D. 600-1,000, suggesting that a similar process was at work in both areas. Moreover, this was a process that was irrevocably tied to the coeval development of specialized highland agriculture. From a perspective of political ecology and structuration theory we emphasis the time-depth and importance that Andean pastoralism had in shaping highland landscapes. Taking into consideration risk-management theory, ecology and environment as crucial factors in the development of a specialized pastoralism we nevertheless emphasis the importance of the underlying human decisions that drove this process. Based broadly within the field of political ecology we therefore emphasize how human agency and structure impacted on these landscapes, society and animal husbandry. Our article covers such aspects as the human and animal use of resource areas, settlement location, herding patterns, selective breeding, and human-induced alterations to pasturage. Keywords: Andes, pastoralism, political ecology, Southern Andes, Central Andes
url https://journals.uair.arizona.edu/index.php/JPE/article/view/23071
work_keys_str_mv AT jenniferlgrant thepoliticalecologyoflatesouthamericanpastoralismanandeanperspectivead10001615
AT kevinlane thepoliticalecologyoflatesouthamericanpastoralismanandeanperspectivead10001615
AT jenniferlgrant politicalecologyoflatesouthamericanpastoralismanandeanperspectivead10001615
AT kevinlane politicalecologyoflatesouthamericanpastoralismanandeanperspectivead10001615
_version_ 1725394689142554624