Discrepancies between Antimullerian Hormone and Follicle Stimulating Hormone in Assisted Reproduction

Data from 107 women undergoing their first IVF/ICSI were analyzed. Relationships between antimullerian hormone (AMH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) were analyzed after dividing patients into four groups according to AMH/FSH levels. Concordance was noted in 57% of women (both AMH/FSH either n...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Munawar Hussain, David Cahill, Valentine Akande, Uma Gordon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2013-01-01
Series:Obstetrics and Gynecology International
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/383278
id doaj-1913445336344331abfd72542216e9fc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1913445336344331abfd72542216e9fc2020-11-25T00:23:32ZengHindawi LimitedObstetrics and Gynecology International1687-95891687-95972013-01-01201310.1155/2013/383278383278Discrepancies between Antimullerian Hormone and Follicle Stimulating Hormone in Assisted ReproductionMunawar Hussain0David Cahill1Valentine Akande2Uma Gordon3St. Michael’s Hospital, University Hospital Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Southwell Street Bristol, BS2 8EG, UKUniversity of Bristol, St. Michael's Hospital, Bristol BS2 8EG, UKSouthmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust & Bristol Centre for Reproductive Medicine Bristol, Southmead Road, Westbury-on-Trym, Bristol BS10 5NB, UKSouthmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust & Bristol Centre for Reproductive Medicine Bristol, Southmead Road, Westbury-on-Trym, Bristol BS10 5NB, UKData from 107 women undergoing their first IVF/ICSI were analyzed. Relationships between antimullerian hormone (AMH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) were analyzed after dividing patients into four groups according to AMH/FSH levels. Concordance was noted in 57% of women (both AMH/FSH either normal or abnormal) while 43%of women had discordant values (AMH/FSH one hormone normal and the other abnormal). Group 1 (AMH and FSH in normal range) and group 2 (normal AMH and high FSH) were younger compared to group 3 (low AMH and normal FSH) and group 4 (both AMH/FSH abnormal). Group 1 showing the best oocyte yield was compared to the remaining three groups. Groups 3 and 4 required higher dose of gonadotrophins for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation showing their low ovarian reserve. There was no difference in cycle cancellation, clinical pregnancy, and live birth/ongoing pregnancy rate in all groups. These tests are useful to predict ovarian response but whether AMH is a substantially better predictor is not yet established.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/383278
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Munawar Hussain
David Cahill
Valentine Akande
Uma Gordon
spellingShingle Munawar Hussain
David Cahill
Valentine Akande
Uma Gordon
Discrepancies between Antimullerian Hormone and Follicle Stimulating Hormone in Assisted Reproduction
Obstetrics and Gynecology International
author_facet Munawar Hussain
David Cahill
Valentine Akande
Uma Gordon
author_sort Munawar Hussain
title Discrepancies between Antimullerian Hormone and Follicle Stimulating Hormone in Assisted Reproduction
title_short Discrepancies between Antimullerian Hormone and Follicle Stimulating Hormone in Assisted Reproduction
title_full Discrepancies between Antimullerian Hormone and Follicle Stimulating Hormone in Assisted Reproduction
title_fullStr Discrepancies between Antimullerian Hormone and Follicle Stimulating Hormone in Assisted Reproduction
title_full_unstemmed Discrepancies between Antimullerian Hormone and Follicle Stimulating Hormone in Assisted Reproduction
title_sort discrepancies between antimullerian hormone and follicle stimulating hormone in assisted reproduction
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Obstetrics and Gynecology International
issn 1687-9589
1687-9597
publishDate 2013-01-01
description Data from 107 women undergoing their first IVF/ICSI were analyzed. Relationships between antimullerian hormone (AMH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) were analyzed after dividing patients into four groups according to AMH/FSH levels. Concordance was noted in 57% of women (both AMH/FSH either normal or abnormal) while 43%of women had discordant values (AMH/FSH one hormone normal and the other abnormal). Group 1 (AMH and FSH in normal range) and group 2 (normal AMH and high FSH) were younger compared to group 3 (low AMH and normal FSH) and group 4 (both AMH/FSH abnormal). Group 1 showing the best oocyte yield was compared to the remaining three groups. Groups 3 and 4 required higher dose of gonadotrophins for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation showing their low ovarian reserve. There was no difference in cycle cancellation, clinical pregnancy, and live birth/ongoing pregnancy rate in all groups. These tests are useful to predict ovarian response but whether AMH is a substantially better predictor is not yet established.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/383278
work_keys_str_mv AT munawarhussain discrepanciesbetweenantimullerianhormoneandfolliclestimulatinghormoneinassistedreproduction
AT davidcahill discrepanciesbetweenantimullerianhormoneandfolliclestimulatinghormoneinassistedreproduction
AT valentineakande discrepanciesbetweenantimullerianhormoneandfolliclestimulatinghormoneinassistedreproduction
AT umagordon discrepanciesbetweenantimullerianhormoneandfolliclestimulatinghormoneinassistedreproduction
_version_ 1725356611501817856