Discrepancies between Antimullerian Hormone and Follicle Stimulating Hormone in Assisted Reproduction
Data from 107 women undergoing their first IVF/ICSI were analyzed. Relationships between antimullerian hormone (AMH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) were analyzed after dividing patients into four groups according to AMH/FSH levels. Concordance was noted in 57% of women (both AMH/FSH either n...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2013-01-01
|
Series: | Obstetrics and Gynecology International |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/383278 |
id |
doaj-1913445336344331abfd72542216e9fc |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-1913445336344331abfd72542216e9fc2020-11-25T00:23:32ZengHindawi LimitedObstetrics and Gynecology International1687-95891687-95972013-01-01201310.1155/2013/383278383278Discrepancies between Antimullerian Hormone and Follicle Stimulating Hormone in Assisted ReproductionMunawar Hussain0David Cahill1Valentine Akande2Uma Gordon3St. Michael’s Hospital, University Hospital Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Southwell Street Bristol, BS2 8EG, UKUniversity of Bristol, St. Michael's Hospital, Bristol BS2 8EG, UKSouthmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust & Bristol Centre for Reproductive Medicine Bristol, Southmead Road, Westbury-on-Trym, Bristol BS10 5NB, UKSouthmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust & Bristol Centre for Reproductive Medicine Bristol, Southmead Road, Westbury-on-Trym, Bristol BS10 5NB, UKData from 107 women undergoing their first IVF/ICSI were analyzed. Relationships between antimullerian hormone (AMH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) were analyzed after dividing patients into four groups according to AMH/FSH levels. Concordance was noted in 57% of women (both AMH/FSH either normal or abnormal) while 43%of women had discordant values (AMH/FSH one hormone normal and the other abnormal). Group 1 (AMH and FSH in normal range) and group 2 (normal AMH and high FSH) were younger compared to group 3 (low AMH and normal FSH) and group 4 (both AMH/FSH abnormal). Group 1 showing the best oocyte yield was compared to the remaining three groups. Groups 3 and 4 required higher dose of gonadotrophins for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation showing their low ovarian reserve. There was no difference in cycle cancellation, clinical pregnancy, and live birth/ongoing pregnancy rate in all groups. These tests are useful to predict ovarian response but whether AMH is a substantially better predictor is not yet established.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/383278 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Munawar Hussain David Cahill Valentine Akande Uma Gordon |
spellingShingle |
Munawar Hussain David Cahill Valentine Akande Uma Gordon Discrepancies between Antimullerian Hormone and Follicle Stimulating Hormone in Assisted Reproduction Obstetrics and Gynecology International |
author_facet |
Munawar Hussain David Cahill Valentine Akande Uma Gordon |
author_sort |
Munawar Hussain |
title |
Discrepancies between Antimullerian Hormone and Follicle Stimulating Hormone in Assisted Reproduction |
title_short |
Discrepancies between Antimullerian Hormone and Follicle Stimulating Hormone in Assisted Reproduction |
title_full |
Discrepancies between Antimullerian Hormone and Follicle Stimulating Hormone in Assisted Reproduction |
title_fullStr |
Discrepancies between Antimullerian Hormone and Follicle Stimulating Hormone in Assisted Reproduction |
title_full_unstemmed |
Discrepancies between Antimullerian Hormone and Follicle Stimulating Hormone in Assisted Reproduction |
title_sort |
discrepancies between antimullerian hormone and follicle stimulating hormone in assisted reproduction |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
series |
Obstetrics and Gynecology International |
issn |
1687-9589 1687-9597 |
publishDate |
2013-01-01 |
description |
Data from 107 women undergoing their first IVF/ICSI were analyzed. Relationships between antimullerian hormone (AMH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) were analyzed after dividing patients into four groups according to AMH/FSH levels. Concordance was noted in 57% of women (both AMH/FSH either normal or abnormal) while 43%of women had discordant values (AMH/FSH one hormone normal and the other abnormal). Group 1 (AMH and FSH in normal range) and group 2 (normal AMH and high FSH) were younger compared to group 3 (low AMH and normal FSH) and group 4 (both AMH/FSH abnormal). Group 1 showing the best oocyte yield was compared to the remaining three groups. Groups 3 and 4 required higher dose of gonadotrophins for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation showing their low ovarian reserve. There was no difference in cycle cancellation, clinical pregnancy, and live birth/ongoing pregnancy rate in all groups. These tests are useful to predict ovarian response but whether AMH is a substantially better predictor is not yet established. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/383278 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT munawarhussain discrepanciesbetweenantimullerianhormoneandfolliclestimulatinghormoneinassistedreproduction AT davidcahill discrepanciesbetweenantimullerianhormoneandfolliclestimulatinghormoneinassistedreproduction AT valentineakande discrepanciesbetweenantimullerianhormoneandfolliclestimulatinghormoneinassistedreproduction AT umagordon discrepanciesbetweenantimullerianhormoneandfolliclestimulatinghormoneinassistedreproduction |
_version_ |
1725356611501817856 |