Sacred Architecture and Public Space under the Conditions of a New Visibility of Religion

Embedded in the paradigm of the “New Visibility of Religion,” this article addresses the question of the significance of sacred buildings for public spaces. ‘Visibility’ is conceived as religion’s presence in cities through the medium of architecture. In maintaining sacred buildings in cities, relig...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jakob Helmut Deibl
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-07-01
Series:Religions
Subjects:
ark
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/11/8/379
id doaj-18ebc19a444a42ddb0083c4935a0c326
record_format Article
spelling doaj-18ebc19a444a42ddb0083c4935a0c3262020-11-25T03:25:32ZengMDPI AGReligions2077-14442020-07-011137937910.3390/rel11080379Sacred Architecture and Public Space under the Conditions of a New Visibility of ReligionJakob Helmut Deibl0Centre for “Religion and Transformation in Contemporary Society”, University of Vienna, 1010 Vienna, AustriaEmbedded in the paradigm of the “New Visibility of Religion,” this article addresses the question of the significance of sacred buildings for public spaces. ‘Visibility’ is conceived as religion’s presence in cities through the medium of architecture. In maintaining sacred buildings in cities, religions expose themselves to the conditions of how cities work. They cannot avoid questions such as how to counteract the tendency of public space to erode. Following some preliminary remarks on the “New Visibility of Religion,” I examine selected sacred buildings in Vienna. Next, I focus on the motifs of the city, the “ark” as a model for sacred buildings and the aesthetic dimension of public space. Finally, I consider the contribution of sacred buildings to contemporary public spaces. What is at issue is not the subject that moves in public and visits sacred buildings with the aim of acquiring knowledge or with the urgency to act, but rather the subject that feels and experiences itself in its dealings with public space and sacred buildings. In this context, I refer to the experience of disinterested beauty (Kant), anachronism, multi-perspectivity (Klaus Heinrich), and openness (Hans-Dieter Bahr).https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/11/8/379sacred architecturepublic spacecityarkVienna
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jakob Helmut Deibl
spellingShingle Jakob Helmut Deibl
Sacred Architecture and Public Space under the Conditions of a New Visibility of Religion
Religions
sacred architecture
public space
city
ark
Vienna
author_facet Jakob Helmut Deibl
author_sort Jakob Helmut Deibl
title Sacred Architecture and Public Space under the Conditions of a New Visibility of Religion
title_short Sacred Architecture and Public Space under the Conditions of a New Visibility of Religion
title_full Sacred Architecture and Public Space under the Conditions of a New Visibility of Religion
title_fullStr Sacred Architecture and Public Space under the Conditions of a New Visibility of Religion
title_full_unstemmed Sacred Architecture and Public Space under the Conditions of a New Visibility of Religion
title_sort sacred architecture and public space under the conditions of a new visibility of religion
publisher MDPI AG
series Religions
issn 2077-1444
publishDate 2020-07-01
description Embedded in the paradigm of the “New Visibility of Religion,” this article addresses the question of the significance of sacred buildings for public spaces. ‘Visibility’ is conceived as religion’s presence in cities through the medium of architecture. In maintaining sacred buildings in cities, religions expose themselves to the conditions of how cities work. They cannot avoid questions such as how to counteract the tendency of public space to erode. Following some preliminary remarks on the “New Visibility of Religion,” I examine selected sacred buildings in Vienna. Next, I focus on the motifs of the city, the “ark” as a model for sacred buildings and the aesthetic dimension of public space. Finally, I consider the contribution of sacred buildings to contemporary public spaces. What is at issue is not the subject that moves in public and visits sacred buildings with the aim of acquiring knowledge or with the urgency to act, but rather the subject that feels and experiences itself in its dealings with public space and sacred buildings. In this context, I refer to the experience of disinterested beauty (Kant), anachronism, multi-perspectivity (Klaus Heinrich), and openness (Hans-Dieter Bahr).
topic sacred architecture
public space
city
ark
Vienna
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/11/8/379
work_keys_str_mv AT jakobhelmutdeibl sacredarchitectureandpublicspaceundertheconditionsofanewvisibilityofreligion
_version_ 1724596608929103872