The Role of Clinical and Instrumented Outcome Measures in Balance Control of Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis

Purpose. The aim of the study was to investigate differences in balance control between individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS) and healthy control subjects using clinical scales and instrumented measures of balance and determine relationships between balance measures, fatigue, and disability level...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Neeta Kanekar, Alexander S. Aruin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2013-01-01
Series:Multiple Sclerosis International
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/190162
id doaj-18e48c9535d84081a072bc442d6f9df5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-18e48c9535d84081a072bc442d6f9df52020-11-24T22:22:28ZengHindawi LimitedMultiple Sclerosis International2090-26542090-26622013-01-01201310.1155/2013/190162190162The Role of Clinical and Instrumented Outcome Measures in Balance Control of Individuals with Multiple SclerosisNeeta Kanekar0Alexander S. Aruin1Department of Physical Therapy, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1919 West Taylor Street, Chicago, IL 60612, USADepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1919 West Taylor Street, Chicago, IL 60612, USAPurpose. The aim of the study was to investigate differences in balance control between individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS) and healthy control subjects using clinical scales and instrumented measures of balance and determine relationships between balance measures, fatigue, and disability levels in individuals with MS with and without a history of falls. Method. Twelve individuals with MS and twelve healthy controls were evaluated using the Berg Balance and Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scales, Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction on Balance, and Limits of Stability Tests as well as Fatigue Severity Scale and Barthel Index. Results. Mildly affected individuals with MS had significant balance performance deficits and poor balance confidence levels (P<0.05). MS group had higher sway velocities and diminished stability limits (P<0.05), significant sensory impairments, high fatigue and disability levels (P<0.05). Sway velocity was a significant predictor of balance performance and the ability to move towards stability limits for the MS group. For the MS-fallers group, those with lower disability levels had faster movement velocities and better balance performance. Conclusion. Implementation of both clinical and instrumented tests of balance is important for the planning and evaluation of treatment outcomes in balance rehabilitation of people with MS.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/190162
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Neeta Kanekar
Alexander S. Aruin
spellingShingle Neeta Kanekar
Alexander S. Aruin
The Role of Clinical and Instrumented Outcome Measures in Balance Control of Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis International
author_facet Neeta Kanekar
Alexander S. Aruin
author_sort Neeta Kanekar
title The Role of Clinical and Instrumented Outcome Measures in Balance Control of Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis
title_short The Role of Clinical and Instrumented Outcome Measures in Balance Control of Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis
title_full The Role of Clinical and Instrumented Outcome Measures in Balance Control of Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis
title_fullStr The Role of Clinical and Instrumented Outcome Measures in Balance Control of Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis
title_full_unstemmed The Role of Clinical and Instrumented Outcome Measures in Balance Control of Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis
title_sort role of clinical and instrumented outcome measures in balance control of individuals with multiple sclerosis
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Multiple Sclerosis International
issn 2090-2654
2090-2662
publishDate 2013-01-01
description Purpose. The aim of the study was to investigate differences in balance control between individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS) and healthy control subjects using clinical scales and instrumented measures of balance and determine relationships between balance measures, fatigue, and disability levels in individuals with MS with and without a history of falls. Method. Twelve individuals with MS and twelve healthy controls were evaluated using the Berg Balance and Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scales, Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction on Balance, and Limits of Stability Tests as well as Fatigue Severity Scale and Barthel Index. Results. Mildly affected individuals with MS had significant balance performance deficits and poor balance confidence levels (P<0.05). MS group had higher sway velocities and diminished stability limits (P<0.05), significant sensory impairments, high fatigue and disability levels (P<0.05). Sway velocity was a significant predictor of balance performance and the ability to move towards stability limits for the MS group. For the MS-fallers group, those with lower disability levels had faster movement velocities and better balance performance. Conclusion. Implementation of both clinical and instrumented tests of balance is important for the planning and evaluation of treatment outcomes in balance rehabilitation of people with MS.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/190162
work_keys_str_mv AT neetakanekar theroleofclinicalandinstrumentedoutcomemeasuresinbalancecontrolofindividualswithmultiplesclerosis
AT alexandersaruin theroleofclinicalandinstrumentedoutcomemeasuresinbalancecontrolofindividualswithmultiplesclerosis
AT neetakanekar roleofclinicalandinstrumentedoutcomemeasuresinbalancecontrolofindividualswithmultiplesclerosis
AT alexandersaruin roleofclinicalandinstrumentedoutcomemeasuresinbalancecontrolofindividualswithmultiplesclerosis
_version_ 1725768138270703616