In-Situ Estimation of Soil Water Retention Curve in Silt Loam and Loamy Sand Soils at Different Soil Depths

The soil water retention curve (SWRC) shows the relationship between soil water (θ) and water potential (ψ) and provides fundamental information for quantifying and modeling soil water entry, storage, flow, and groundwater recharge processes. While traditionally it is measured in a laboratory throug...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Reem Zeitoun, Mark Vandergeest, Hiteshkumar Bhogilal Vasava, Pedro Vitor Ferrari Machado, Sean Jordan, Gary Parkin, Claudia Wagner-Riddle, Asim Biswas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-01-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/2/447
id doaj-18e2fa529be24ffe861162ca51eaa7e9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-18e2fa529be24ffe861162ca51eaa7e92021-01-11T00:01:20ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202021-01-012144744710.3390/s21020447In-Situ Estimation of Soil Water Retention Curve in Silt Loam and Loamy Sand Soils at Different Soil DepthsReem Zeitoun0Mark Vandergeest1Hiteshkumar Bhogilal Vasava2Pedro Vitor Ferrari Machado3Sean Jordan4Gary Parkin5Claudia Wagner-Riddle6Asim Biswas7School of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, CanadaSchool of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, CanadaSchool of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, CanadaSchool of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, CanadaSchool of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, CanadaSchool of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, CanadaSchool of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, CanadaSchool of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, CanadaThe soil water retention curve (SWRC) shows the relationship between soil water (θ) and water potential (ψ) and provides fundamental information for quantifying and modeling soil water entry, storage, flow, and groundwater recharge processes. While traditionally it is measured in a laboratory through cumbersome and time-intensive methods, soil sensors measuring in-situ θ and ψ show strong potential to estimate in-situ SWRC. The objective of this study was to estimate in-situ SWRC at different depths under two different soil types by integrating measured θ and ψ using two commercial sensors: time-domain reflectometer (TDR) and dielectric field water potential (e.g., MPS-6) principles. Parametric models were used to quantify θ—ψ relationships at various depths and were compared to laboratory-measured SWRC. The results of the study show that combining TDR and MPS-6 sensors can be used to estimate plant-available water and SWRC, with a mean difference of −0.03 to 0.23 m<sup>3</sup>m<sup>−3</sup> between the modeled data and laboratory data, which could be caused by the sensors’ lack of site-specific calibration or possible air entrapment of field soil. However, consistent trends (with magnitude differences) indicated the potential to use these sensors in estimating in-situ and dynamic SWRC at depths and provided a way forward in overcoming resource-intensive laboratory measurements.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/2/447field capacitymatric potentialparametric modelspermanent wiltingsoil water content
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Reem Zeitoun
Mark Vandergeest
Hiteshkumar Bhogilal Vasava
Pedro Vitor Ferrari Machado
Sean Jordan
Gary Parkin
Claudia Wagner-Riddle
Asim Biswas
spellingShingle Reem Zeitoun
Mark Vandergeest
Hiteshkumar Bhogilal Vasava
Pedro Vitor Ferrari Machado
Sean Jordan
Gary Parkin
Claudia Wagner-Riddle
Asim Biswas
In-Situ Estimation of Soil Water Retention Curve in Silt Loam and Loamy Sand Soils at Different Soil Depths
Sensors
field capacity
matric potential
parametric models
permanent wilting
soil water content
author_facet Reem Zeitoun
Mark Vandergeest
Hiteshkumar Bhogilal Vasava
Pedro Vitor Ferrari Machado
Sean Jordan
Gary Parkin
Claudia Wagner-Riddle
Asim Biswas
author_sort Reem Zeitoun
title In-Situ Estimation of Soil Water Retention Curve in Silt Loam and Loamy Sand Soils at Different Soil Depths
title_short In-Situ Estimation of Soil Water Retention Curve in Silt Loam and Loamy Sand Soils at Different Soil Depths
title_full In-Situ Estimation of Soil Water Retention Curve in Silt Loam and Loamy Sand Soils at Different Soil Depths
title_fullStr In-Situ Estimation of Soil Water Retention Curve in Silt Loam and Loamy Sand Soils at Different Soil Depths
title_full_unstemmed In-Situ Estimation of Soil Water Retention Curve in Silt Loam and Loamy Sand Soils at Different Soil Depths
title_sort in-situ estimation of soil water retention curve in silt loam and loamy sand soils at different soil depths
publisher MDPI AG
series Sensors
issn 1424-8220
publishDate 2021-01-01
description The soil water retention curve (SWRC) shows the relationship between soil water (θ) and water potential (ψ) and provides fundamental information for quantifying and modeling soil water entry, storage, flow, and groundwater recharge processes. While traditionally it is measured in a laboratory through cumbersome and time-intensive methods, soil sensors measuring in-situ θ and ψ show strong potential to estimate in-situ SWRC. The objective of this study was to estimate in-situ SWRC at different depths under two different soil types by integrating measured θ and ψ using two commercial sensors: time-domain reflectometer (TDR) and dielectric field water potential (e.g., MPS-6) principles. Parametric models were used to quantify θ—ψ relationships at various depths and were compared to laboratory-measured SWRC. The results of the study show that combining TDR and MPS-6 sensors can be used to estimate plant-available water and SWRC, with a mean difference of −0.03 to 0.23 m<sup>3</sup>m<sup>−3</sup> between the modeled data and laboratory data, which could be caused by the sensors’ lack of site-specific calibration or possible air entrapment of field soil. However, consistent trends (with magnitude differences) indicated the potential to use these sensors in estimating in-situ and dynamic SWRC at depths and provided a way forward in overcoming resource-intensive laboratory measurements.
topic field capacity
matric potential
parametric models
permanent wilting
soil water content
url https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/2/447
work_keys_str_mv AT reemzeitoun insituestimationofsoilwaterretentioncurveinsiltloamandloamysandsoilsatdifferentsoildepths
AT markvandergeest insituestimationofsoilwaterretentioncurveinsiltloamandloamysandsoilsatdifferentsoildepths
AT hiteshkumarbhogilalvasava insituestimationofsoilwaterretentioncurveinsiltloamandloamysandsoilsatdifferentsoildepths
AT pedrovitorferrarimachado insituestimationofsoilwaterretentioncurveinsiltloamandloamysandsoilsatdifferentsoildepths
AT seanjordan insituestimationofsoilwaterretentioncurveinsiltloamandloamysandsoilsatdifferentsoildepths
AT garyparkin insituestimationofsoilwaterretentioncurveinsiltloamandloamysandsoilsatdifferentsoildepths
AT claudiawagnerriddle insituestimationofsoilwaterretentioncurveinsiltloamandloamysandsoilsatdifferentsoildepths
AT asimbiswas insituestimationofsoilwaterretentioncurveinsiltloamandloamysandsoilsatdifferentsoildepths
_version_ 1724341670198116352