The relationship between information quality and external quality markers in Persian public

Introduction: One approach to evaluate the quality of a web page is to investigate its external markers. The purpose of the present study is to determine the relationship between information quality of Persian public health web pages and their external quality.   Methods: The samples of this correla...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: H Ghalavand, R Eskrootchi, M Alibeyk, H Haghani
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Iran University of Medical Sciences 2012-04-01
Series:مدیریت سلامت
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jha.iums.ac.ir/article-1-869-en.html
id doaj-18ddae4a36724b26afacd2f77f7a9b31
record_format Article
spelling doaj-18ddae4a36724b26afacd2f77f7a9b312020-11-25T01:59:00ZfasIran University of Medical Sciencesمدیریت سلامت2008-12002008-12192012-04-0115475966The relationship between information quality and external quality markers in Persian publicH Ghalavand0R Eskrootchi1M Alibeyk2H Haghani3 tehran university of medical science tehran university of medical science tehran university of medical science tehran university of medical science Introduction: One approach to evaluate the quality of a web page is to investigate its external markers. The purpose of the present study is to determine the relationship between information quality of Persian public health web pages and their external quality.   Methods: The samples of this correlation study were selected from among the freely available ten-key word texts of chronic diseases in Google and Yahoo search engines. Data were collected by means of two checklists and were analyzed through Pearson correlation test using SPSS software. The reliability of the checklists was determined by test-retest procedure.   Results: 50 percent of web pages contained all information quality criteria but no WebPages have shown all quality markers. The mean values for the quality of information and appearance markers in web pages were 76.2% and 42.9%, respectively. There was no significant relationship between information quality criteria and external quality markers in the Persian public health web pages.   Discussion: It can be concluded that in Persian public health web pages, the analysis of quality markers is not an appropriate method to judge information quality of these pages. These current tools, therefore, cannot reflect the quality of content in Persian web pages.http://jha.iums.ac.ir/article-1-869-en.htmlWeb information qualityinformation quality criteriaweb information quality indicatorspublic health information
collection DOAJ
language fas
format Article
sources DOAJ
author H Ghalavand
R Eskrootchi
M Alibeyk
H Haghani
spellingShingle H Ghalavand
R Eskrootchi
M Alibeyk
H Haghani
The relationship between information quality and external quality markers in Persian public
مدیریت سلامت
Web information quality
information quality criteria
web information quality indicators
public health information
author_facet H Ghalavand
R Eskrootchi
M Alibeyk
H Haghani
author_sort H Ghalavand
title The relationship between information quality and external quality markers in Persian public
title_short The relationship between information quality and external quality markers in Persian public
title_full The relationship between information quality and external quality markers in Persian public
title_fullStr The relationship between information quality and external quality markers in Persian public
title_full_unstemmed The relationship between information quality and external quality markers in Persian public
title_sort relationship between information quality and external quality markers in persian public
publisher Iran University of Medical Sciences
series مدیریت سلامت
issn 2008-1200
2008-1219
publishDate 2012-04-01
description Introduction: One approach to evaluate the quality of a web page is to investigate its external markers. The purpose of the present study is to determine the relationship between information quality of Persian public health web pages and their external quality.   Methods: The samples of this correlation study were selected from among the freely available ten-key word texts of chronic diseases in Google and Yahoo search engines. Data were collected by means of two checklists and were analyzed through Pearson correlation test using SPSS software. The reliability of the checklists was determined by test-retest procedure.   Results: 50 percent of web pages contained all information quality criteria but no WebPages have shown all quality markers. The mean values for the quality of information and appearance markers in web pages were 76.2% and 42.9%, respectively. There was no significant relationship between information quality criteria and external quality markers in the Persian public health web pages.   Discussion: It can be concluded that in Persian public health web pages, the analysis of quality markers is not an appropriate method to judge information quality of these pages. These current tools, therefore, cannot reflect the quality of content in Persian web pages.
topic Web information quality
information quality criteria
web information quality indicators
public health information
url http://jha.iums.ac.ir/article-1-869-en.html
work_keys_str_mv AT hghalavand therelationshipbetweeninformationqualityandexternalqualitymarkersinpersianpublic
AT reskrootchi therelationshipbetweeninformationqualityandexternalqualitymarkersinpersianpublic
AT malibeyk therelationshipbetweeninformationqualityandexternalqualitymarkersinpersianpublic
AT hhaghani therelationshipbetweeninformationqualityandexternalqualitymarkersinpersianpublic
AT hghalavand relationshipbetweeninformationqualityandexternalqualitymarkersinpersianpublic
AT reskrootchi relationshipbetweeninformationqualityandexternalqualitymarkersinpersianpublic
AT malibeyk relationshipbetweeninformationqualityandexternalqualitymarkersinpersianpublic
AT hhaghani relationshipbetweeninformationqualityandexternalqualitymarkersinpersianpublic
_version_ 1724966616068784128