On the selection of concept nominator in cases of semantic parallelism

Analysis of a concept starts from the concept nominator - a word that best represents the idea behind the concept. In cases of semantic parallelism (i.e. existence of two or more often polysemous words that nominate the same object or idea) it is necessary to establish the procedure for the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Stefanović Marija J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Institute for the Serbian Language, Belgrade 2016-01-01
Series:Južnoslovenski Filolog
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0350-185X/2016/0350-185X1604137S.pdf
id doaj-18d0aa3a4d4240ec8b8cd1d25e2957d5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-18d0aa3a4d4240ec8b8cd1d25e2957d52020-11-24T23:43:14ZengSerbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Institute for the Serbian Language, BelgradeJužnoslovenski Filolog0350-185X2406-07632016-01-01723-413715810.2298/JFI1604137S0350-185X1604137SOn the selection of concept nominator in cases of semantic parallelismStefanović Marija J.0Filozofski fakultet, Odsek za slavistiku, Novi SadAnalysis of a concept starts from the concept nominator - a word that best represents the idea behind the concept. In cases of semantic parallelism (i.e. existence of two or more often polysemous words that nominate the same object or idea) it is necessary to establish the procedure for the selection of the concept nominator. It is often the case that the many meanings of such words are identical, in certain, but they are not interchangeable in all contexts, which makes it difficult to determine the number of concepts they represent. Therefore, it is necessary to establish whether a word is the nominator of a concept, or it is only one of the possible elements in the concept’s nominative field. The associative fields contain information on the concept that an average person has, and that knowledge is context-free, so the analysis of associative fields shows the ways of conceptualization for the analyzed lexemes and it shows their relation in the lexical and semantic systems. Analysis of the associative fields trud and rabota in the Russian language has shown that the concept trud is included in the concept rabota, because all aspects of their conceptualization coincide, but the lexeme trud is perceived as more related to the political, economic and moral spheres, so it is shifting towards the periphery of the lexical system. The lexeme rabota should be considered the nominator of the concept related to purposeful human activity in the Russian conceptosphere. [Project of the Serbian Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development, Grant no. 178002: Jezici i kulture u vremenu i prostoru]http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0350-185X/2016/0350-185X1604137S.pdfassociative methodpolysemyconcept trud (Russian)concept rabota(Russian)
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Stefanović Marija J.
spellingShingle Stefanović Marija J.
On the selection of concept nominator in cases of semantic parallelism
Južnoslovenski Filolog
associative method
polysemy
concept trud (Russian)
concept rabota(Russian)
author_facet Stefanović Marija J.
author_sort Stefanović Marija J.
title On the selection of concept nominator in cases of semantic parallelism
title_short On the selection of concept nominator in cases of semantic parallelism
title_full On the selection of concept nominator in cases of semantic parallelism
title_fullStr On the selection of concept nominator in cases of semantic parallelism
title_full_unstemmed On the selection of concept nominator in cases of semantic parallelism
title_sort on the selection of concept nominator in cases of semantic parallelism
publisher Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Institute for the Serbian Language, Belgrade
series Južnoslovenski Filolog
issn 0350-185X
2406-0763
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Analysis of a concept starts from the concept nominator - a word that best represents the idea behind the concept. In cases of semantic parallelism (i.e. existence of two or more often polysemous words that nominate the same object or idea) it is necessary to establish the procedure for the selection of the concept nominator. It is often the case that the many meanings of such words are identical, in certain, but they are not interchangeable in all contexts, which makes it difficult to determine the number of concepts they represent. Therefore, it is necessary to establish whether a word is the nominator of a concept, or it is only one of the possible elements in the concept’s nominative field. The associative fields contain information on the concept that an average person has, and that knowledge is context-free, so the analysis of associative fields shows the ways of conceptualization for the analyzed lexemes and it shows their relation in the lexical and semantic systems. Analysis of the associative fields trud and rabota in the Russian language has shown that the concept trud is included in the concept rabota, because all aspects of their conceptualization coincide, but the lexeme trud is perceived as more related to the political, economic and moral spheres, so it is shifting towards the periphery of the lexical system. The lexeme rabota should be considered the nominator of the concept related to purposeful human activity in the Russian conceptosphere. [Project of the Serbian Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development, Grant no. 178002: Jezici i kulture u vremenu i prostoru]
topic associative method
polysemy
concept trud (Russian)
concept rabota(Russian)
url http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0350-185X/2016/0350-185X1604137S.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT stefanovicmarijaj ontheselectionofconceptnominatorincasesofsemanticparallelism
_version_ 1725502502374211584