Comparison of the Long-Term Outcomes of Endoscopic Papillary Large Balloon Dilation Alone versus Endoscopic Sphincterotomy for Removal of Bile Duct Stones

Background and Aims. Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (EPLBD) alone is an alternative to endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) for treatment of common bile duct (CBD) stones. However, limited data exists regarding comparison of the long-term outcomes for these techniques. In this study, we comp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tao Li, Jun Wen, Like Bie, Biao Gong
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2018-01-01
Series:Gastroenterology Research and Practice
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/6430701
id doaj-18c3656a954e44b2b65537b0950c9dfa
record_format Article
spelling doaj-18c3656a954e44b2b65537b0950c9dfa2020-11-24T21:36:27ZengHindawi LimitedGastroenterology Research and Practice1687-61211687-630X2018-01-01201810.1155/2018/64307016430701Comparison of the Long-Term Outcomes of Endoscopic Papillary Large Balloon Dilation Alone versus Endoscopic Sphincterotomy for Removal of Bile Duct StonesTao Li0Jun Wen1Like Bie2Biao Gong3Digestive Endoscopy Center, Department of Gastroenterology, Ruijin Hospital, Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, ChinaDigestive Endoscopy Center, Department of Gastroenterology, Ruijin Hospital, Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, ChinaDigestive Endoscopy Center, Department of Gastroenterology, Ruijin Hospital, Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, ChinaDigestive Endoscopy Center, Department of Gastroenterology, Ruijin Hospital, Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, ChinaBackground and Aims. Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (EPLBD) alone is an alternative to endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) for treatment of common bile duct (CBD) stones. However, limited data exists regarding comparison of the long-term outcomes for these techniques. In this study, we compared the long-term outcomes after EST with those after EPLBD alone for removal of CBD stones. Methods. The records of patients with EST or EPLBD alone referred for CBD stones retrieval between June 2008 and July 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Complete stone clearance, ERCP-related adverse events, and late biliary complications during long-term follow-up were analyzed. Results. Basic patient characteristics were similar between the groups that underwent EST (n=60) and EPLBD alone (n=161). EPLBD compared with EST resulted in similar outcomes in terms of complete stone clearance (99.4% versus 100%, P=0.54) and ERCP-related adverse events (6.8% versus 6.7%, P=1.00). The mean duration of the follow-up was 74.5 months and 71.6 months who underwent EST and EPLBD alone, respectively (P=0.42). Late biliary complications were occurred frequently in the EST group than in the EPLBD alone group (11 [18.6%] versus 16 [10.2%]), although the difference did not reach statistical significance (P=0.11). Multivariate analysis showed that mechanical lithotripsy ([OR], 2.815; 95% CI, 1.148–6.902; P=0.024) was significantly associated with late biliary complications. Conclusion. As an alternative to EST, EPLBD has similar efficacy and safety for managing CBD stones. During long-term follow-up, patients who underwent EPLBD alone may have fewer late biliary complications compared with those after EST. In addition, mechanical lithotripsy may be an independent risk factor for late biliary complications.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/6430701
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tao Li
Jun Wen
Like Bie
Biao Gong
spellingShingle Tao Li
Jun Wen
Like Bie
Biao Gong
Comparison of the Long-Term Outcomes of Endoscopic Papillary Large Balloon Dilation Alone versus Endoscopic Sphincterotomy for Removal of Bile Duct Stones
Gastroenterology Research and Practice
author_facet Tao Li
Jun Wen
Like Bie
Biao Gong
author_sort Tao Li
title Comparison of the Long-Term Outcomes of Endoscopic Papillary Large Balloon Dilation Alone versus Endoscopic Sphincterotomy for Removal of Bile Duct Stones
title_short Comparison of the Long-Term Outcomes of Endoscopic Papillary Large Balloon Dilation Alone versus Endoscopic Sphincterotomy for Removal of Bile Duct Stones
title_full Comparison of the Long-Term Outcomes of Endoscopic Papillary Large Balloon Dilation Alone versus Endoscopic Sphincterotomy for Removal of Bile Duct Stones
title_fullStr Comparison of the Long-Term Outcomes of Endoscopic Papillary Large Balloon Dilation Alone versus Endoscopic Sphincterotomy for Removal of Bile Duct Stones
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Long-Term Outcomes of Endoscopic Papillary Large Balloon Dilation Alone versus Endoscopic Sphincterotomy for Removal of Bile Duct Stones
title_sort comparison of the long-term outcomes of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation alone versus endoscopic sphincterotomy for removal of bile duct stones
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Gastroenterology Research and Practice
issn 1687-6121
1687-630X
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Background and Aims. Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (EPLBD) alone is an alternative to endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) for treatment of common bile duct (CBD) stones. However, limited data exists regarding comparison of the long-term outcomes for these techniques. In this study, we compared the long-term outcomes after EST with those after EPLBD alone for removal of CBD stones. Methods. The records of patients with EST or EPLBD alone referred for CBD stones retrieval between June 2008 and July 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Complete stone clearance, ERCP-related adverse events, and late biliary complications during long-term follow-up were analyzed. Results. Basic patient characteristics were similar between the groups that underwent EST (n=60) and EPLBD alone (n=161). EPLBD compared with EST resulted in similar outcomes in terms of complete stone clearance (99.4% versus 100%, P=0.54) and ERCP-related adverse events (6.8% versus 6.7%, P=1.00). The mean duration of the follow-up was 74.5 months and 71.6 months who underwent EST and EPLBD alone, respectively (P=0.42). Late biliary complications were occurred frequently in the EST group than in the EPLBD alone group (11 [18.6%] versus 16 [10.2%]), although the difference did not reach statistical significance (P=0.11). Multivariate analysis showed that mechanical lithotripsy ([OR], 2.815; 95% CI, 1.148–6.902; P=0.024) was significantly associated with late biliary complications. Conclusion. As an alternative to EST, EPLBD has similar efficacy and safety for managing CBD stones. During long-term follow-up, patients who underwent EPLBD alone may have fewer late biliary complications compared with those after EST. In addition, mechanical lithotripsy may be an independent risk factor for late biliary complications.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/6430701
work_keys_str_mv AT taoli comparisonofthelongtermoutcomesofendoscopicpapillarylargeballoondilationaloneversusendoscopicsphincterotomyforremovalofbileductstones
AT junwen comparisonofthelongtermoutcomesofendoscopicpapillarylargeballoondilationaloneversusendoscopicsphincterotomyforremovalofbileductstones
AT likebie comparisonofthelongtermoutcomesofendoscopicpapillarylargeballoondilationaloneversusendoscopicsphincterotomyforremovalofbileductstones
AT biaogong comparisonofthelongtermoutcomesofendoscopicpapillarylargeballoondilationaloneversusendoscopicsphincterotomyforremovalofbileductstones
_version_ 1725941067671404544