Cities of "others" : public space and everyday practices
This paper deals with the concept of «public space». It works with the ambiguities embedded therein, contrasting material space/s – the streets, squares, parks, public buildings of the city – with the other spaces created through the functions and institutions of the «public sphe...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
|
Series: | Geographica Helvetica |
Online Access: | http://www.geogr-helv.net/64/11/2009/gh-64-11-2009.pdf |
id |
doaj-18c16743412b400092468517f05fb5d2 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-18c16743412b400092468517f05fb5d22020-11-24T22:03:03ZdeuCopernicus PublicationsGeographica Helvetica0016-73122194-8798641112010.5194/gh-64-11-2009Cities of "others" : public space and everyday practicesD. Vaiou0A. Kalandides1Department of Urban and Regional Planning, National Technical University of Athens, Patission Str. 42, 10682 Athens, GreecePhD Cand., Department of Urban and Regional Planning, National Technical University of Athens, Patission Str. 42, 10682 Athens, Greece and INPOLIS UCE GmbH, Dunckerstrasse 90A, 10437 Berlin, GermanyThis paper deals with the concept of «public space». It works with the ambiguities embedded therein, contrasting material space/s – the streets, squares, parks, public buildings of the city – with the other spaces created through the functions and institutions of the «public sphere» as a site of public deliberation. Focussing on the ambiguities of the concept allow questions of access, interaction, participation, cultural and symbolic rights of passage to be posed. Public space is approached here as constituted through the practices of everyday life: it is produced and constantly contested, reflecting – among other things – relations of power. Differences in gender, ethnicity or sexuality often lead to binary thinking, such as inside/outside, inclusion/exclusion, local/stranger. The way that such categories intertwine in everyday life, though, unsettle easy categorisations and force a questioning of strict lines of division. It is in this context that a proposal is made to discuss the city of «others», drawing from research examples which cross over such lines.http://www.geogr-helv.net/64/11/2009/gh-64-11-2009.pdf |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
deu |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
D. Vaiou A. Kalandides |
spellingShingle |
D. Vaiou A. Kalandides Cities of "others" : public space and everyday practices Geographica Helvetica |
author_facet |
D. Vaiou A. Kalandides |
author_sort |
D. Vaiou |
title |
Cities of "others" : public space and everyday practices |
title_short |
Cities of "others" : public space and everyday practices |
title_full |
Cities of "others" : public space and everyday practices |
title_fullStr |
Cities of "others" : public space and everyday practices |
title_full_unstemmed |
Cities of "others" : public space and everyday practices |
title_sort |
cities of "others" : public space and everyday practices |
publisher |
Copernicus Publications |
series |
Geographica Helvetica |
issn |
0016-7312 2194-8798 |
description |
This paper deals with the concept of «public space».
It works with the ambiguities embedded therein, contrasting
material space/s – the streets, squares, parks,
public buildings of the city – with the other spaces
created through the functions and institutions of the
«public sphere» as a site of public deliberation. Focussing
on the ambiguities of the concept allow questions
of access, interaction, participation, cultural and symbolic
rights of passage to be posed. Public space is
approached here as constituted through the practices
of everyday life: it is produced and constantly contested,
reflecting – among other things – relations of
power. Differences in gender, ethnicity or sexuality
often lead to binary thinking, such as inside/outside,
inclusion/exclusion, local/stranger. The way that such
categories intertwine in everyday life, though, unsettle
easy categorisations and force a questioning of strict
lines of division. It is in this context that a proposal
is made to discuss the city of «others», drawing from
research examples which cross over such lines. |
url |
http://www.geogr-helv.net/64/11/2009/gh-64-11-2009.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT dvaiou citiesofotherspublicspaceandeverydaypractices AT akalandides citiesofotherspublicspaceandeverydaypractices |
_version_ |
1725833431249584128 |