Influence of Different Restorative Techniques on the Strength of Endodontically Treated Weakened Roots

Objective. Comparing effect of different restoration techniques on fracture resistance of compromised roots. Methods. Crowns of 100 single-rooted teeth were sectioned and 10 roots were kept as negative control group (Group 1). Remaining roots were instrumented and divided into one and positive contr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Khalid H. Alsamadani, El-Sayed Mohammed Abdaziz, El-Sayed Gad
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2012-01-01
Series:International Journal of Dentistry
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/343712
id doaj-18b1f29b7a34476d8c100c258007169d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-18b1f29b7a34476d8c100c258007169d2020-11-25T00:23:31ZengHindawi LimitedInternational Journal of Dentistry1687-87281687-87362012-01-01201210.1155/2012/343712343712Influence of Different Restorative Techniques on the Strength of Endodontically Treated Weakened RootsKhalid H. Alsamadani0El-Sayed Mohammed Abdaziz1El-Sayed Gad2Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Taibah University, Al Madinah Al Monawarah, Saudi ArabiaConservative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Ajman University, UAEDental Biomaterials, Restorative Dental Science Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Taibah University, Al Madinah Al Monawarah, Saudi ArabiaObjective. Comparing effect of different restoration techniques on fracture resistance of compromised roots. Methods. Crowns of 100 single-rooted teeth were sectioned and 10 roots were kept as negative control group (Group 1). Remaining roots were instrumented and divided into one and positive control group of 10 samples (Group 2) and 4 experimental groups of 20 samples each. Group 3: roots were obturated with gutta-percha; Group 4: roots were restored with gutta-percha, composite, and glass fiber post; Group 5: roots were obturated with Resilon; Group 6: Roots were restored with Resilon, composite, and glass fiber post. Roots were weakened before obturation in groups 2, 3, and 5 and after obturation in groups 4 and 6. Fracture strengths were measured using Dartec testing machine and fracture load was recorded in kilo-Newton. Statistical analysis was done using ANOVA and Tukeys test. Results. The fractures resistance of restored roots was significantly higher in groups 4, 5, and 6 than in Groups 2 and 3. There were no significant differences between groups 1, 4, 5, and 6. Conclusions. Restoration of weakened roots with Resilon or bonding an intermediate composite resin to coronal radicular dentin and to glass fiber post increased their fracture resistance.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/343712
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Khalid H. Alsamadani
El-Sayed Mohammed Abdaziz
El-Sayed Gad
spellingShingle Khalid H. Alsamadani
El-Sayed Mohammed Abdaziz
El-Sayed Gad
Influence of Different Restorative Techniques on the Strength of Endodontically Treated Weakened Roots
International Journal of Dentistry
author_facet Khalid H. Alsamadani
El-Sayed Mohammed Abdaziz
El-Sayed Gad
author_sort Khalid H. Alsamadani
title Influence of Different Restorative Techniques on the Strength of Endodontically Treated Weakened Roots
title_short Influence of Different Restorative Techniques on the Strength of Endodontically Treated Weakened Roots
title_full Influence of Different Restorative Techniques on the Strength of Endodontically Treated Weakened Roots
title_fullStr Influence of Different Restorative Techniques on the Strength of Endodontically Treated Weakened Roots
title_full_unstemmed Influence of Different Restorative Techniques on the Strength of Endodontically Treated Weakened Roots
title_sort influence of different restorative techniques on the strength of endodontically treated weakened roots
publisher Hindawi Limited
series International Journal of Dentistry
issn 1687-8728
1687-8736
publishDate 2012-01-01
description Objective. Comparing effect of different restoration techniques on fracture resistance of compromised roots. Methods. Crowns of 100 single-rooted teeth were sectioned and 10 roots were kept as negative control group (Group 1). Remaining roots were instrumented and divided into one and positive control group of 10 samples (Group 2) and 4 experimental groups of 20 samples each. Group 3: roots were obturated with gutta-percha; Group 4: roots were restored with gutta-percha, composite, and glass fiber post; Group 5: roots were obturated with Resilon; Group 6: Roots were restored with Resilon, composite, and glass fiber post. Roots were weakened before obturation in groups 2, 3, and 5 and after obturation in groups 4 and 6. Fracture strengths were measured using Dartec testing machine and fracture load was recorded in kilo-Newton. Statistical analysis was done using ANOVA and Tukeys test. Results. The fractures resistance of restored roots was significantly higher in groups 4, 5, and 6 than in Groups 2 and 3. There were no significant differences between groups 1, 4, 5, and 6. Conclusions. Restoration of weakened roots with Resilon or bonding an intermediate composite resin to coronal radicular dentin and to glass fiber post increased their fracture resistance.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/343712
work_keys_str_mv AT khalidhalsamadani influenceofdifferentrestorativetechniquesonthestrengthofendodonticallytreatedweakenedroots
AT elsayedmohammedabdaziz influenceofdifferentrestorativetechniquesonthestrengthofendodonticallytreatedweakenedroots
AT elsayedgad influenceofdifferentrestorativetechniquesonthestrengthofendodonticallytreatedweakenedroots
_version_ 1725356592977674240