Embodied mind and phenomenal consciousness

In recent years, a central debate in the philosophy of mind and cognitive science concerns the role of the body in perception and cognition. For many contemporary philosophers, not only cognition but also perception is connected mainly with the brain, where the processing of input from the senses ta...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Maria VENIERI
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Pedagogical University of Cracow 2015-06-01
Series:Argument : Biannual Philosophical Journal
Online Access:http://argumentwp.vipserv.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/pdfv5n1/argument_v5_n1_Venieri.pdf
id doaj-18b0fb5f52054c25a3ae4b5fb01e5d70
record_format Article
spelling doaj-18b0fb5f52054c25a3ae4b5fb01e5d702020-11-24T23:13:53ZdeuPedagogical University of CracowArgument : Biannual Philosophical Journal2083-66352084-10432015-06-0151924Embodied mind and phenomenal consciousnessMaria VENIERI 0University of CreteIn recent years, a central debate in the philosophy of mind and cognitive science concerns the role of the body in perception and cognition. For many contemporary philosophers, not only cognition but also perception is connected mainly with the brain, where the processing of input from the senses takes place; whereas for the proponents of ‘embodied cognition’ other aspects of the body beyond the brain, including the environment, play a constitutive role in cognitive processes. In terms of perception, a new theory has emerged which stresses percep‑ tion’s active character and claims that the embodied subject and the environment, with which it interacts, form a dynamic system. Supporters of ‘enactive perception’ such as Susan Hurley and Alva Noë maintain that the physical substrate or the supervenience basis of perceptual experience and phenomenal consciousness may include besides the brain and the nervous system other bodily and environmental features. Yet, it will be argued in this paper that the interaction between the subject and the environment forms a system of causal relations, so we can theoretically interfere in the causal chains and create hallucinations, which cannot be distinguished from veridical perception, or a virtual reality as in the film Matrix (1999). This kind of argument and its related thought experiments aim to stress the primacy of the brain in determining phenomenal states, and show that the body and certain interactions with the environment have a causal, but not a constitutive or essential role, in forming phenomenal consciousness.http://argumentwp.vipserv.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/pdfv5n1/argument_v5_n1_Venieri.pdf
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Maria VENIERI
spellingShingle Maria VENIERI
Embodied mind and phenomenal consciousness
Argument : Biannual Philosophical Journal
author_facet Maria VENIERI
author_sort Maria VENIERI
title Embodied mind and phenomenal consciousness
title_short Embodied mind and phenomenal consciousness
title_full Embodied mind and phenomenal consciousness
title_fullStr Embodied mind and phenomenal consciousness
title_full_unstemmed Embodied mind and phenomenal consciousness
title_sort embodied mind and phenomenal consciousness
publisher Pedagogical University of Cracow
series Argument : Biannual Philosophical Journal
issn 2083-6635
2084-1043
publishDate 2015-06-01
description In recent years, a central debate in the philosophy of mind and cognitive science concerns the role of the body in perception and cognition. For many contemporary philosophers, not only cognition but also perception is connected mainly with the brain, where the processing of input from the senses takes place; whereas for the proponents of ‘embodied cognition’ other aspects of the body beyond the brain, including the environment, play a constitutive role in cognitive processes. In terms of perception, a new theory has emerged which stresses percep‑ tion’s active character and claims that the embodied subject and the environment, with which it interacts, form a dynamic system. Supporters of ‘enactive perception’ such as Susan Hurley and Alva Noë maintain that the physical substrate or the supervenience basis of perceptual experience and phenomenal consciousness may include besides the brain and the nervous system other bodily and environmental features. Yet, it will be argued in this paper that the interaction between the subject and the environment forms a system of causal relations, so we can theoretically interfere in the causal chains and create hallucinations, which cannot be distinguished from veridical perception, or a virtual reality as in the film Matrix (1999). This kind of argument and its related thought experiments aim to stress the primacy of the brain in determining phenomenal states, and show that the body and certain interactions with the environment have a causal, but not a constitutive or essential role, in forming phenomenal consciousness.
url http://argumentwp.vipserv.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/pdfv5n1/argument_v5_n1_Venieri.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mariavenieri embodiedmindandphenomenalconsciousness
_version_ 1725596326034407424