The action cycle/structural context framework: a fisheries application

There is a growing consensus that environmental governance is a wicked problem that requires understanding of the many linkages and feedbacks between human and natural systems. Here, I propose an action cycle/structural context (AC/SC) framework that is based on the concept of responsive governance,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: D.G. Webster
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Resilience Alliance 2015-03-01
Series:Ecology and Society
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol20/iss1/art33/
id doaj-1890cad8053b4c7b8f5c1ad13aaaa6c3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1890cad8053b4c7b8f5c1ad13aaaa6c32020-11-24T23:04:55ZengResilience AllianceEcology and Society1708-30872015-03-012013310.5751/ES-07272-2001337272The action cycle/structural context framework: a fisheries applicationD.G. Webster0Dartmouth CollegeThere is a growing consensus that environmental governance is a wicked problem that requires understanding of the many linkages and feedbacks between human and natural systems. Here, I propose an action cycle/structural context (AC/SC) framework that is based on the concept of responsive governance, in which individuals and decision makers respond to problems rather than working to prevent them. By linking agency and structure, the AC/SC framework points out two key problems in the realm of environmental governance: the profit disconnect, whereby economic signals of environmental harm are dampened by endogenous or exogenous forces, and the power disconnect, whereby those who feel the costs of harm are politically marginalized and so have little influence to effect solutions. I apply this framework to fisheries to develop hypotheses regarding exclusionary and conservation-oriented responses under different power/profit dynamics. These expectations are tested in a historical case study of management of the lobster fishery in Maine. The analysis confirms the importance of profit/power dynamics and reveals that governance tends to go through effective and ineffective cycles in a management treadmill that can be driven by internal or external forces. The latter in particular are generally ignored in fisheries management but could ultimately undermine sustainability even in previously well-managed systems.http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol20/iss1/art33/complexityenvironmental governancefisheriessocial-ecological systems
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author D.G. Webster
spellingShingle D.G. Webster
The action cycle/structural context framework: a fisheries application
Ecology and Society
complexity
environmental governance
fisheries
social-ecological systems
author_facet D.G. Webster
author_sort D.G. Webster
title The action cycle/structural context framework: a fisheries application
title_short The action cycle/structural context framework: a fisheries application
title_full The action cycle/structural context framework: a fisheries application
title_fullStr The action cycle/structural context framework: a fisheries application
title_full_unstemmed The action cycle/structural context framework: a fisheries application
title_sort action cycle/structural context framework: a fisheries application
publisher Resilience Alliance
series Ecology and Society
issn 1708-3087
publishDate 2015-03-01
description There is a growing consensus that environmental governance is a wicked problem that requires understanding of the many linkages and feedbacks between human and natural systems. Here, I propose an action cycle/structural context (AC/SC) framework that is based on the concept of responsive governance, in which individuals and decision makers respond to problems rather than working to prevent them. By linking agency and structure, the AC/SC framework points out two key problems in the realm of environmental governance: the profit disconnect, whereby economic signals of environmental harm are dampened by endogenous or exogenous forces, and the power disconnect, whereby those who feel the costs of harm are politically marginalized and so have little influence to effect solutions. I apply this framework to fisheries to develop hypotheses regarding exclusionary and conservation-oriented responses under different power/profit dynamics. These expectations are tested in a historical case study of management of the lobster fishery in Maine. The analysis confirms the importance of profit/power dynamics and reveals that governance tends to go through effective and ineffective cycles in a management treadmill that can be driven by internal or external forces. The latter in particular are generally ignored in fisheries management but could ultimately undermine sustainability even in previously well-managed systems.
topic complexity
environmental governance
fisheries
social-ecological systems
url http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol20/iss1/art33/
work_keys_str_mv AT dgwebster theactioncyclestructuralcontextframeworkafisheriesapplication
AT dgwebster actioncyclestructuralcontextframeworkafisheriesapplication
_version_ 1716372135663894528