The End of Political Islam? A Comparative Analysis of Religious Parties in the Muslim Democracy of Indonesia

Why do some religious parties survive after adopting a moderate ideological outlook while others do not? The rise and fall of religious parties since the onset of democratic transition in Indonesia has set off an intriguing debate over the role and future of political Islam in electoral politics. Th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kikue Hamayotsu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2011-09-01
Series:Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/186810341103000305
id doaj-188343a57caa47f2b32ced5a307ae560
record_format Article
spelling doaj-188343a57caa47f2b32ced5a307ae5602020-11-25T03:52:33ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs1868-10341868-48822011-09-013010.1177/186810341103000305The End of Political Islam? A Comparative Analysis of Religious Parties in the Muslim Democracy of IndonesiaKikue Hamayotsu0Department of Political Science, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, USA.Why do some religious parties survive after adopting a moderate ideological outlook while others do not? The rise and fall of religious parties since the onset of democratic transition in Indonesia has set off an intriguing debate over the role and future of political Islam in electoral politics. This article seeks to explain the diverging – and unexpected – trajectories of the two most prominent religious parties, the National Awakening Party (PKB) and Justice Prosperous Party (PKS) through a close examination of the case of PKB. It emphasizes organizational qualities to advance two claims. First, the decline of the moderate PKB is the result of the permeation of personality-based clientelistic and ascriptive relations as well as lack of party institutionalization. Political survival of the puritanical Islamist PKS, on the other hand, is explained by organizational cohesion achieved through party institutionalization. Second, a disciplined party structure has allowed PKS elites to achieve controversial ideological adjustments. In short, a moderate centralist religious ideology or outlook alone is not sufficient to achieve political survival in the competitive environment of electoral and religious politics.https://doi.org/10.1177/186810341103000305
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kikue Hamayotsu
spellingShingle Kikue Hamayotsu
The End of Political Islam? A Comparative Analysis of Religious Parties in the Muslim Democracy of Indonesia
Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs
author_facet Kikue Hamayotsu
author_sort Kikue Hamayotsu
title The End of Political Islam? A Comparative Analysis of Religious Parties in the Muslim Democracy of Indonesia
title_short The End of Political Islam? A Comparative Analysis of Religious Parties in the Muslim Democracy of Indonesia
title_full The End of Political Islam? A Comparative Analysis of Religious Parties in the Muslim Democracy of Indonesia
title_fullStr The End of Political Islam? A Comparative Analysis of Religious Parties in the Muslim Democracy of Indonesia
title_full_unstemmed The End of Political Islam? A Comparative Analysis of Religious Parties in the Muslim Democracy of Indonesia
title_sort end of political islam? a comparative analysis of religious parties in the muslim democracy of indonesia
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs
issn 1868-1034
1868-4882
publishDate 2011-09-01
description Why do some religious parties survive after adopting a moderate ideological outlook while others do not? The rise and fall of religious parties since the onset of democratic transition in Indonesia has set off an intriguing debate over the role and future of political Islam in electoral politics. This article seeks to explain the diverging – and unexpected – trajectories of the two most prominent religious parties, the National Awakening Party (PKB) and Justice Prosperous Party (PKS) through a close examination of the case of PKB. It emphasizes organizational qualities to advance two claims. First, the decline of the moderate PKB is the result of the permeation of personality-based clientelistic and ascriptive relations as well as lack of party institutionalization. Political survival of the puritanical Islamist PKS, on the other hand, is explained by organizational cohesion achieved through party institutionalization. Second, a disciplined party structure has allowed PKS elites to achieve controversial ideological adjustments. In short, a moderate centralist religious ideology or outlook alone is not sufficient to achieve political survival in the competitive environment of electoral and religious politics.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/186810341103000305
work_keys_str_mv AT kikuehamayotsu theendofpoliticalislamacomparativeanalysisofreligiouspartiesinthemuslimdemocracyofindonesia
AT kikuehamayotsu endofpoliticalislamacomparativeanalysisofreligiouspartiesinthemuslimdemocracyofindonesia
_version_ 1724482236830449664