Last interglacial model–data mismatch of thermal maximum temperatures partially explained

The timing of the last interglacial (LIG) thermal maximum across the globe remains to be precisely assessed. Because of difficulties in establishing a common temporal framework between records from different palaeoclimatic archives retrieved from various places around the globe, it has not yet been...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: P. Bakker, H. Renssen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2014-08-01
Series:Climate of the Past
Online Access:http://www.clim-past.net/10/1633/2014/cp-10-1633-2014.pdf
id doaj-1869c20c1f0f4e9485c996c953284750
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1869c20c1f0f4e9485c996c9532847502020-11-24T20:59:05ZengCopernicus PublicationsClimate of the Past1814-93241814-93322014-08-011041633164410.5194/cp-10-1633-2014Last interglacial model–data mismatch of thermal maximum temperatures partially explainedP. Bakker0H. Renssen1Earth and Climate Cluster, Department of Earth Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, 1081HV Amsterdam, the NetherlandsEarth and Climate Cluster, Department of Earth Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, 1081HV Amsterdam, the NetherlandsThe timing of the last interglacial (LIG) thermal maximum across the globe remains to be precisely assessed. Because of difficulties in establishing a common temporal framework between records from different palaeoclimatic archives retrieved from various places around the globe, it has not yet been possible to reconstruct spatio-temporal variations in the occurrence of the maximum warmth across the globe. Instead, snapshot reconstructions of warmest LIG conditions have been presented, which have an underlying assumption that maximum warmth occurred synchronously everywhere. Although known to be an oversimplification, the impact of this assumption on temperature estimates has yet to be assessed. We use the LIG temperature evolutions simulated by nine different climate models to investigate whether the assumption of synchronicity results in a sizeable overestimation of the LIG thermal maximum. We find that for annual temperatures, the overestimation is small, strongly model-dependent (global mean 0.4 ± 0.3 °C) and cannot explain the recently published 0.67 °C difference between simulated and reconstructed annual mean temperatures during the LIG thermal maximum. However, if one takes into consideration that temperature proxies are possibly biased towards summer, the overestimation of the LIG thermal maximum based on warmest month temperatures is non-negligible with a global mean of 1.1 ± 0.4 °C.http://www.clim-past.net/10/1633/2014/cp-10-1633-2014.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author P. Bakker
H. Renssen
spellingShingle P. Bakker
H. Renssen
Last interglacial model–data mismatch of thermal maximum temperatures partially explained
Climate of the Past
author_facet P. Bakker
H. Renssen
author_sort P. Bakker
title Last interglacial model–data mismatch of thermal maximum temperatures partially explained
title_short Last interglacial model–data mismatch of thermal maximum temperatures partially explained
title_full Last interglacial model–data mismatch of thermal maximum temperatures partially explained
title_fullStr Last interglacial model–data mismatch of thermal maximum temperatures partially explained
title_full_unstemmed Last interglacial model–data mismatch of thermal maximum temperatures partially explained
title_sort last interglacial model–data mismatch of thermal maximum temperatures partially explained
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Climate of the Past
issn 1814-9324
1814-9332
publishDate 2014-08-01
description The timing of the last interglacial (LIG) thermal maximum across the globe remains to be precisely assessed. Because of difficulties in establishing a common temporal framework between records from different palaeoclimatic archives retrieved from various places around the globe, it has not yet been possible to reconstruct spatio-temporal variations in the occurrence of the maximum warmth across the globe. Instead, snapshot reconstructions of warmest LIG conditions have been presented, which have an underlying assumption that maximum warmth occurred synchronously everywhere. Although known to be an oversimplification, the impact of this assumption on temperature estimates has yet to be assessed. We use the LIG temperature evolutions simulated by nine different climate models to investigate whether the assumption of synchronicity results in a sizeable overestimation of the LIG thermal maximum. We find that for annual temperatures, the overestimation is small, strongly model-dependent (global mean 0.4 ± 0.3 °C) and cannot explain the recently published 0.67 °C difference between simulated and reconstructed annual mean temperatures during the LIG thermal maximum. However, if one takes into consideration that temperature proxies are possibly biased towards summer, the overestimation of the LIG thermal maximum based on warmest month temperatures is non-negligible with a global mean of 1.1 ± 0.4 °C.
url http://www.clim-past.net/10/1633/2014/cp-10-1633-2014.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT pbakker lastinterglacialmodelndashdatamismatchofthermalmaximumtemperaturespartiallyexplained
AT hrenssen lastinterglacialmodelndashdatamismatchofthermalmaximumtemperaturespartiallyexplained
_version_ 1716783903723749376