Last interglacial model–data mismatch of thermal maximum temperatures partially explained
The timing of the last interglacial (LIG) thermal maximum across the globe remains to be precisely assessed. Because of difficulties in establishing a common temporal framework between records from different palaeoclimatic archives retrieved from various places around the globe, it has not yet been...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2014-08-01
|
Series: | Climate of the Past |
Online Access: | http://www.clim-past.net/10/1633/2014/cp-10-1633-2014.pdf |
id |
doaj-1869c20c1f0f4e9485c996c953284750 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-1869c20c1f0f4e9485c996c9532847502020-11-24T20:59:05ZengCopernicus PublicationsClimate of the Past1814-93241814-93322014-08-011041633164410.5194/cp-10-1633-2014Last interglacial model–data mismatch of thermal maximum temperatures partially explainedP. Bakker0H. Renssen1Earth and Climate Cluster, Department of Earth Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, 1081HV Amsterdam, the NetherlandsEarth and Climate Cluster, Department of Earth Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, 1081HV Amsterdam, the NetherlandsThe timing of the last interglacial (LIG) thermal maximum across the globe remains to be precisely assessed. Because of difficulties in establishing a common temporal framework between records from different palaeoclimatic archives retrieved from various places around the globe, it has not yet been possible to reconstruct spatio-temporal variations in the occurrence of the maximum warmth across the globe. Instead, snapshot reconstructions of warmest LIG conditions have been presented, which have an underlying assumption that maximum warmth occurred synchronously everywhere. Although known to be an oversimplification, the impact of this assumption on temperature estimates has yet to be assessed. We use the LIG temperature evolutions simulated by nine different climate models to investigate whether the assumption of synchronicity results in a sizeable overestimation of the LIG thermal maximum. We find that for annual temperatures, the overestimation is small, strongly model-dependent (global mean 0.4 ± 0.3 °C) and cannot explain the recently published 0.67 °C difference between simulated and reconstructed annual mean temperatures during the LIG thermal maximum. However, if one takes into consideration that temperature proxies are possibly biased towards summer, the overestimation of the LIG thermal maximum based on warmest month temperatures is non-negligible with a global mean of 1.1 ± 0.4 °C.http://www.clim-past.net/10/1633/2014/cp-10-1633-2014.pdf |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
P. Bakker H. Renssen |
spellingShingle |
P. Bakker H. Renssen Last interglacial model–data mismatch of thermal maximum temperatures partially explained Climate of the Past |
author_facet |
P. Bakker H. Renssen |
author_sort |
P. Bakker |
title |
Last interglacial model–data mismatch of thermal maximum temperatures partially explained |
title_short |
Last interglacial model–data mismatch of thermal maximum temperatures partially explained |
title_full |
Last interglacial model–data mismatch of thermal maximum temperatures partially explained |
title_fullStr |
Last interglacial model–data mismatch of thermal maximum temperatures partially explained |
title_full_unstemmed |
Last interglacial model–data mismatch of thermal maximum temperatures partially explained |
title_sort |
last interglacial model–data mismatch of thermal maximum temperatures partially explained |
publisher |
Copernicus Publications |
series |
Climate of the Past |
issn |
1814-9324 1814-9332 |
publishDate |
2014-08-01 |
description |
The timing of the last interglacial (LIG) thermal maximum across the globe
remains to be precisely assessed. Because of difficulties in establishing a
common temporal framework between records from different palaeoclimatic
archives retrieved from various places around the globe, it has not yet been
possible to reconstruct spatio-temporal variations in the occurrence of the
maximum warmth across the globe. Instead, snapshot reconstructions of warmest
LIG conditions have been presented, which have an underlying assumption that
maximum warmth occurred synchronously everywhere. Although known to be an
oversimplification, the impact of this assumption on temperature estimates
has yet to be assessed. We use the LIG temperature evolutions simulated by
nine
different climate models to investigate whether the assumption of
synchronicity results in a sizeable overestimation of the LIG thermal
maximum. We find that for annual temperatures, the overestimation is small,
strongly model-dependent (global mean 0.4 ± 0.3 °C)
and cannot explain the recently published 0.67 °C difference
between simulated and reconstructed annual mean temperatures during the LIG
thermal maximum. However, if one takes into consideration that temperature
proxies are possibly biased towards summer, the overestimation of the LIG
thermal maximum based on warmest month temperatures is non-negligible with a
global mean of 1.1 ± 0.4 °C. |
url |
http://www.clim-past.net/10/1633/2014/cp-10-1633-2014.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT pbakker lastinterglacialmodelndashdatamismatchofthermalmaximumtemperaturespartiallyexplained AT hrenssen lastinterglacialmodelndashdatamismatchofthermalmaximumtemperaturespartiallyexplained |
_version_ |
1716783903723749376 |