Performance of preferential flow models in predicting infiltration through a remolded soil with artificial macropores

Abstract Preferential flow in soils contributes to water and contaminant leaching to groundwater and subsurface drains. At practical scales, preferential flow is often neglected due to the lack of consensus or guidance on how to simulate this process. Dual‐permeability (DP) approaches are a standard...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lucie Guertault, Garey. A. Fox
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-01-01
Series:Vadose Zone Journal
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/vzj2.20055
id doaj-1867769eb9254dca8fdf203b43e5cc58
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1867769eb9254dca8fdf203b43e5cc582021-07-26T19:08:20ZengWileyVadose Zone Journal1539-16632020-01-01191n/an/a10.1002/vzj2.20055Performance of preferential flow models in predicting infiltration through a remolded soil with artificial macroporesLucie Guertault0Garey. A. Fox1Dep. of Biological and Agricultural Engineering North Carolina State Univ. 178 Weaver Labs, Campus Box 7625 Raleigh NC 27695‐7625 USADep. of Biological and Agricultural Engineering North Carolina State Univ. 104 Weaver Administration, Campus Box 7625 Raleigh NC 27695‐7625 USAAbstract Preferential flow in soils contributes to water and contaminant leaching to groundwater and subsurface drains. At practical scales, preferential flow is often neglected due to the lack of consensus or guidance on how to simulate this process. Dual‐permeability (DP) approaches are a standard, but their applicability in practice is limited by the large number of parameters involved. The source‐responsive (SR) model simulates preferential flow as flow films along the walls of macropores that interact with the soil matrix. The objective of this study was to evaluate the ability of the SR model and a DP model with calibration limited to macropore parameters to simulate hydrologic variables of interest for practical applications. Infiltration experiments were conducted in a 150‐cm‐long by 50‐cm‐wide by 40‐cm‐deep soil column with vertical artificial macropores, with preferential flow being the most prevalent flow process. Two macropore configurations and various rainfall rates were tested. The DP model provided relatively accurate predictions of the bottom drainage rates, but inaccurate soil parameter estimates resulted in poor predictions of matrix flow. Critical limitations in the SR model formulation were highlighted, and the model was revised. The refined SR model provided accurate predictions of bottom drainage rates and water contents under steady‐state rainfall. The DP model with a reduced calibration appeared valid to estimate subsurface fluxes with negligible matrix flow. The SR model applicability is limited to steady‐state scenarios with negligible matrix flow. Critical developments are needed for the SR model to be applicable in practice.https://doi.org/10.1002/vzj2.20055
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lucie Guertault
Garey. A. Fox
spellingShingle Lucie Guertault
Garey. A. Fox
Performance of preferential flow models in predicting infiltration through a remolded soil with artificial macropores
Vadose Zone Journal
author_facet Lucie Guertault
Garey. A. Fox
author_sort Lucie Guertault
title Performance of preferential flow models in predicting infiltration through a remolded soil with artificial macropores
title_short Performance of preferential flow models in predicting infiltration through a remolded soil with artificial macropores
title_full Performance of preferential flow models in predicting infiltration through a remolded soil with artificial macropores
title_fullStr Performance of preferential flow models in predicting infiltration through a remolded soil with artificial macropores
title_full_unstemmed Performance of preferential flow models in predicting infiltration through a remolded soil with artificial macropores
title_sort performance of preferential flow models in predicting infiltration through a remolded soil with artificial macropores
publisher Wiley
series Vadose Zone Journal
issn 1539-1663
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Abstract Preferential flow in soils contributes to water and contaminant leaching to groundwater and subsurface drains. At practical scales, preferential flow is often neglected due to the lack of consensus or guidance on how to simulate this process. Dual‐permeability (DP) approaches are a standard, but their applicability in practice is limited by the large number of parameters involved. The source‐responsive (SR) model simulates preferential flow as flow films along the walls of macropores that interact with the soil matrix. The objective of this study was to evaluate the ability of the SR model and a DP model with calibration limited to macropore parameters to simulate hydrologic variables of interest for practical applications. Infiltration experiments were conducted in a 150‐cm‐long by 50‐cm‐wide by 40‐cm‐deep soil column with vertical artificial macropores, with preferential flow being the most prevalent flow process. Two macropore configurations and various rainfall rates were tested. The DP model provided relatively accurate predictions of the bottom drainage rates, but inaccurate soil parameter estimates resulted in poor predictions of matrix flow. Critical limitations in the SR model formulation were highlighted, and the model was revised. The refined SR model provided accurate predictions of bottom drainage rates and water contents under steady‐state rainfall. The DP model with a reduced calibration appeared valid to estimate subsurface fluxes with negligible matrix flow. The SR model applicability is limited to steady‐state scenarios with negligible matrix flow. Critical developments are needed for the SR model to be applicable in practice.
url https://doi.org/10.1002/vzj2.20055
work_keys_str_mv AT lucieguertault performanceofpreferentialflowmodelsinpredictinginfiltrationthrougharemoldedsoilwithartificialmacropores
AT gareyafox performanceofpreferentialflowmodelsinpredictinginfiltrationthrougharemoldedsoilwithartificialmacropores
_version_ 1721280719043428352