A Hybrid Sensing Approach for Pure and Adulterated Honey Classification

This paper presents a comparison between data from single modality and fusion methods to classify Tualang honey as pure or adulterated using Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) statistical classification approaches. Ten different brands of certified pure Tualang...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ammar Zakaria, Norazian Subari, Ali Yeon Md Shakaff, Junita Mohamad Saleh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2012-10-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/12/10/14022
id doaj-1865ef5cfdf0433f8d1b5e93e34160e1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1865ef5cfdf0433f8d1b5e93e34160e12020-11-25T00:28:48ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202012-10-011210140221404010.3390/s121014022A Hybrid Sensing Approach for Pure and Adulterated Honey ClassificationAmmar ZakariaNorazian SubariAli Yeon Md ShakaffJunita Mohamad SalehThis paper presents a comparison between data from single modality and fusion methods to classify Tualang honey as pure or adulterated using Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) statistical classification approaches. Ten different brands of certified pure Tualang honey were obtained throughout peninsular Malaysia and Sumatera, Indonesia. Various concentrations of two types of sugar solution (beet and cane sugar) were used in this investigation to create honey samples of 20%, 40%, 60% and 80% adulteration concentrations. Honey data extracted from an electronic nose (e-nose) and Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) were gathered, analyzed and compared based on fusion methods. Visual observation of classification plots revealed that the PCA approach able to distinct pure and adulterated honey samples better than the LDA technique. Overall, the validated classification results based on FTIR data (88.0%) gave higher classification accuracy than e-nose data (76.5%) using the LDA technique. Honey classification based on normalized low-level and intermediate-level FTIR and e-nose fusion data scored classification accuracies of 92.2% and 88.7%, respectively using the Stepwise LDA method. The results suggested that pure and adulterated honey samples were better classified using FTIR and e-nose fusion data than single modality data.http://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/12/10/14022electronic noseFTIRhoney classificationdata fusionpure honey
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ammar Zakaria
Norazian Subari
Ali Yeon Md Shakaff
Junita Mohamad Saleh
spellingShingle Ammar Zakaria
Norazian Subari
Ali Yeon Md Shakaff
Junita Mohamad Saleh
A Hybrid Sensing Approach for Pure and Adulterated Honey Classification
Sensors
electronic nose
FTIR
honey classification
data fusion
pure honey
author_facet Ammar Zakaria
Norazian Subari
Ali Yeon Md Shakaff
Junita Mohamad Saleh
author_sort Ammar Zakaria
title A Hybrid Sensing Approach for Pure and Adulterated Honey Classification
title_short A Hybrid Sensing Approach for Pure and Adulterated Honey Classification
title_full A Hybrid Sensing Approach for Pure and Adulterated Honey Classification
title_fullStr A Hybrid Sensing Approach for Pure and Adulterated Honey Classification
title_full_unstemmed A Hybrid Sensing Approach for Pure and Adulterated Honey Classification
title_sort hybrid sensing approach for pure and adulterated honey classification
publisher MDPI AG
series Sensors
issn 1424-8220
publishDate 2012-10-01
description This paper presents a comparison between data from single modality and fusion methods to classify Tualang honey as pure or adulterated using Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) statistical classification approaches. Ten different brands of certified pure Tualang honey were obtained throughout peninsular Malaysia and Sumatera, Indonesia. Various concentrations of two types of sugar solution (beet and cane sugar) were used in this investigation to create honey samples of 20%, 40%, 60% and 80% adulteration concentrations. Honey data extracted from an electronic nose (e-nose) and Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) were gathered, analyzed and compared based on fusion methods. Visual observation of classification plots revealed that the PCA approach able to distinct pure and adulterated honey samples better than the LDA technique. Overall, the validated classification results based on FTIR data (88.0%) gave higher classification accuracy than e-nose data (76.5%) using the LDA technique. Honey classification based on normalized low-level and intermediate-level FTIR and e-nose fusion data scored classification accuracies of 92.2% and 88.7%, respectively using the Stepwise LDA method. The results suggested that pure and adulterated honey samples were better classified using FTIR and e-nose fusion data than single modality data.
topic electronic nose
FTIR
honey classification
data fusion
pure honey
url http://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/12/10/14022
work_keys_str_mv AT ammarzakaria ahybridsensingapproachforpureandadulteratedhoneyclassification
AT noraziansubari ahybridsensingapproachforpureandadulteratedhoneyclassification
AT aliyeonmdshakaff ahybridsensingapproachforpureandadulteratedhoneyclassification
AT junitamohamadsaleh ahybridsensingapproachforpureandadulteratedhoneyclassification
AT ammarzakaria hybridsensingapproachforpureandadulteratedhoneyclassification
AT noraziansubari hybridsensingapproachforpureandadulteratedhoneyclassification
AT aliyeonmdshakaff hybridsensingapproachforpureandadulteratedhoneyclassification
AT junitamohamadsaleh hybridsensingapproachforpureandadulteratedhoneyclassification
_version_ 1725334384933863424