A Hybrid Sensing Approach for Pure and Adulterated Honey Classification
This paper presents a comparison between data from single modality and fusion methods to classify Tualang honey as pure or adulterated using Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) statistical classification approaches. Ten different brands of certified pure Tualang...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2012-10-01
|
Series: | Sensors |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/12/10/14022 |
id |
doaj-1865ef5cfdf0433f8d1b5e93e34160e1 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-1865ef5cfdf0433f8d1b5e93e34160e12020-11-25T00:28:48ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202012-10-011210140221404010.3390/s121014022A Hybrid Sensing Approach for Pure and Adulterated Honey ClassificationAmmar ZakariaNorazian SubariAli Yeon Md ShakaffJunita Mohamad SalehThis paper presents a comparison between data from single modality and fusion methods to classify Tualang honey as pure or adulterated using Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) statistical classification approaches. Ten different brands of certified pure Tualang honey were obtained throughout peninsular Malaysia and Sumatera, Indonesia. Various concentrations of two types of sugar solution (beet and cane sugar) were used in this investigation to create honey samples of 20%, 40%, 60% and 80% adulteration concentrations. Honey data extracted from an electronic nose (e-nose) and Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) were gathered, analyzed and compared based on fusion methods. Visual observation of classification plots revealed that the PCA approach able to distinct pure and adulterated honey samples better than the LDA technique. Overall, the validated classification results based on FTIR data (88.0%) gave higher classification accuracy than e-nose data (76.5%) using the LDA technique. Honey classification based on normalized low-level and intermediate-level FTIR and e-nose fusion data scored classification accuracies of 92.2% and 88.7%, respectively using the Stepwise LDA method. The results suggested that pure and adulterated honey samples were better classified using FTIR and e-nose fusion data than single modality data.http://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/12/10/14022electronic noseFTIRhoney classificationdata fusionpure honey |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Ammar Zakaria Norazian Subari Ali Yeon Md Shakaff Junita Mohamad Saleh |
spellingShingle |
Ammar Zakaria Norazian Subari Ali Yeon Md Shakaff Junita Mohamad Saleh A Hybrid Sensing Approach for Pure and Adulterated Honey Classification Sensors electronic nose FTIR honey classification data fusion pure honey |
author_facet |
Ammar Zakaria Norazian Subari Ali Yeon Md Shakaff Junita Mohamad Saleh |
author_sort |
Ammar Zakaria |
title |
A Hybrid Sensing Approach for Pure and Adulterated Honey Classification |
title_short |
A Hybrid Sensing Approach for Pure and Adulterated Honey Classification |
title_full |
A Hybrid Sensing Approach for Pure and Adulterated Honey Classification |
title_fullStr |
A Hybrid Sensing Approach for Pure and Adulterated Honey Classification |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Hybrid Sensing Approach for Pure and Adulterated Honey Classification |
title_sort |
hybrid sensing approach for pure and adulterated honey classification |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Sensors |
issn |
1424-8220 |
publishDate |
2012-10-01 |
description |
This paper presents a comparison between data from single modality and fusion methods to classify Tualang honey as pure or adulterated using Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) statistical classification approaches. Ten different brands of certified pure Tualang honey were obtained throughout peninsular Malaysia and Sumatera, Indonesia. Various concentrations of two types of sugar solution (beet and cane sugar) were used in this investigation to create honey samples of 20%, 40%, 60% and 80% adulteration concentrations. Honey data extracted from an electronic nose (e-nose) and Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) were gathered, analyzed and compared based on fusion methods. Visual observation of classification plots revealed that the PCA approach able to distinct pure and adulterated honey samples better than the LDA technique. Overall, the validated classification results based on FTIR data (88.0%) gave higher classification accuracy than e-nose data (76.5%) using the LDA technique. Honey classification based on normalized low-level and intermediate-level FTIR and e-nose fusion data scored classification accuracies of 92.2% and 88.7%, respectively using the Stepwise LDA method. The results suggested that pure and adulterated honey samples were better classified using FTIR and e-nose fusion data than single modality data. |
topic |
electronic nose FTIR honey classification data fusion pure honey |
url |
http://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/12/10/14022 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ammarzakaria ahybridsensingapproachforpureandadulteratedhoneyclassification AT noraziansubari ahybridsensingapproachforpureandadulteratedhoneyclassification AT aliyeonmdshakaff ahybridsensingapproachforpureandadulteratedhoneyclassification AT junitamohamadsaleh ahybridsensingapproachforpureandadulteratedhoneyclassification AT ammarzakaria hybridsensingapproachforpureandadulteratedhoneyclassification AT noraziansubari hybridsensingapproachforpureandadulteratedhoneyclassification AT aliyeonmdshakaff hybridsensingapproachforpureandadulteratedhoneyclassification AT junitamohamadsaleh hybridsensingapproachforpureandadulteratedhoneyclassification |
_version_ |
1725334384933863424 |