Photopatch and UV-irradiated patch testing in photosensitive dermatitis

Background: The photopatch test is used to detect photoallergic reactions to various antigens such as sunscreens and drugs. Photosensitive dermatitis can be caused due to antigens like parthenium, fragrances, rubbers and metals. The photopatch test does not contain these antigens. Therefore, the Ind...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Reena Rai, Maria Thomas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2016-01-01
Series:Indian Dermatology Online Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.idoj.in/article.asp?issn=2229-5178;year=2016;volume=7;issue=1;spage=12;epage=16;aulast=Rai
id doaj-18512f7b5617486e8bdb7b347a8d39e9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-18512f7b5617486e8bdb7b347a8d39e92020-11-24T22:46:34ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Dermatology Online Journal2229-51782016-01-0171121610.4103/2229-5178.174319Photopatch and UV-irradiated patch testing in photosensitive dermatitisReena RaiMaria ThomasBackground: The photopatch test is used to detect photoallergic reactions to various antigens such as sunscreens and drugs. Photosensitive dermatitis can be caused due to antigens like parthenium, fragrances, rubbers and metals. The photopatch test does not contain these antigens. Therefore, the Indian Standard Series (ISS) along with the Standard photopatch series from Chemotechnique Diagnostics, Sweden was used to detect light induced antigens. Aim: To detect light induced antigens in patients with photosensitive dermatitis. Methods: This study was done in a descriptive, observer blinded manner. Photopatch test and ISS were applied in duplicate on the patient's back by the standard method. After 24 hours, readings were recorded according to ICDRG criteria. One side was closed and other side irradiated with 14 J/cm2 of UVA and a second set of readings were recorded after 48 hrs. Result: The highest positivity was obtained with parthenium, with 18 out of 35 (51%) patients showing a positive patch test reaction with both photoallergic contact dermatitis and photoaggravation. Four patients (11%) showed positive patch test reaction suggestive of contact dermatitis to potassium dichromate and fragrance mix. Six patients had contact dermatitis to numerous antigens such as nickel, cobalt, chinoform and para-phenylenediamine. None of these patients showed photoaggravation on patch testing. Conclusion: Parthenium was found to cause photoallergy, contact dermatitis with photoaggravation and contact allergy. Hence, photopatch test and UV irradiated patch test can be an important tool to detect light induced antigens in patients with photosensitive dermatitis.http://www.idoj.in/article.asp?issn=2229-5178;year=2016;volume=7;issue=1;spage=12;epage=16;aulast=RaiPhotopatchpartheniumphotoallergy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Reena Rai
Maria Thomas
spellingShingle Reena Rai
Maria Thomas
Photopatch and UV-irradiated patch testing in photosensitive dermatitis
Indian Dermatology Online Journal
Photopatch
parthenium
photoallergy
author_facet Reena Rai
Maria Thomas
author_sort Reena Rai
title Photopatch and UV-irradiated patch testing in photosensitive dermatitis
title_short Photopatch and UV-irradiated patch testing in photosensitive dermatitis
title_full Photopatch and UV-irradiated patch testing in photosensitive dermatitis
title_fullStr Photopatch and UV-irradiated patch testing in photosensitive dermatitis
title_full_unstemmed Photopatch and UV-irradiated patch testing in photosensitive dermatitis
title_sort photopatch and uv-irradiated patch testing in photosensitive dermatitis
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Indian Dermatology Online Journal
issn 2229-5178
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Background: The photopatch test is used to detect photoallergic reactions to various antigens such as sunscreens and drugs. Photosensitive dermatitis can be caused due to antigens like parthenium, fragrances, rubbers and metals. The photopatch test does not contain these antigens. Therefore, the Indian Standard Series (ISS) along with the Standard photopatch series from Chemotechnique Diagnostics, Sweden was used to detect light induced antigens. Aim: To detect light induced antigens in patients with photosensitive dermatitis. Methods: This study was done in a descriptive, observer blinded manner. Photopatch test and ISS were applied in duplicate on the patient's back by the standard method. After 24 hours, readings were recorded according to ICDRG criteria. One side was closed and other side irradiated with 14 J/cm2 of UVA and a second set of readings were recorded after 48 hrs. Result: The highest positivity was obtained with parthenium, with 18 out of 35 (51%) patients showing a positive patch test reaction with both photoallergic contact dermatitis and photoaggravation. Four patients (11%) showed positive patch test reaction suggestive of contact dermatitis to potassium dichromate and fragrance mix. Six patients had contact dermatitis to numerous antigens such as nickel, cobalt, chinoform and para-phenylenediamine. None of these patients showed photoaggravation on patch testing. Conclusion: Parthenium was found to cause photoallergy, contact dermatitis with photoaggravation and contact allergy. Hence, photopatch test and UV irradiated patch test can be an important tool to detect light induced antigens in patients with photosensitive dermatitis.
topic Photopatch
parthenium
photoallergy
url http://www.idoj.in/article.asp?issn=2229-5178;year=2016;volume=7;issue=1;spage=12;epage=16;aulast=Rai
work_keys_str_mv AT reenarai photopatchanduvirradiatedpatchtestinginphotosensitivedermatitis
AT mariathomas photopatchanduvirradiatedpatchtestinginphotosensitivedermatitis
_version_ 1725684814111047680