Relevance of aboveground litter for soil organic matter formation – a soil profile perspective

<p>In contrast to mineral topsoils, in subsoils the origin and processes leading to the formation and stabilization of organic matter (OM) are still not well known. This study addresses the fate of litter-derived carbon (C) in whole soil profiles with regard to the conceptual cascade model, wh...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: P. Liebmann, P. Wordell-Dietrich, K. Kalbitz, R. Mikutta, F. Kalks, A. Don, S. K. Woche, L. R. Dsilva, G. Guggenberger
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2020-06-01
Series:Biogeosciences
Online Access:https://www.biogeosciences.net/17/3099/2020/bg-17-3099-2020.pdf
id doaj-185090060be54bdfbdac73e2778b92e7
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author P. Liebmann
P. Wordell-Dietrich
K. Kalbitz
R. Mikutta
F. Kalks
A. Don
S. K. Woche
L. R. Dsilva
G. Guggenberger
spellingShingle P. Liebmann
P. Wordell-Dietrich
K. Kalbitz
R. Mikutta
F. Kalks
A. Don
S. K. Woche
L. R. Dsilva
G. Guggenberger
Relevance of aboveground litter for soil organic matter formation – a soil profile perspective
Biogeosciences
author_facet P. Liebmann
P. Wordell-Dietrich
K. Kalbitz
R. Mikutta
F. Kalks
A. Don
S. K. Woche
L. R. Dsilva
G. Guggenberger
author_sort P. Liebmann
title Relevance of aboveground litter for soil organic matter formation – a soil profile perspective
title_short Relevance of aboveground litter for soil organic matter formation – a soil profile perspective
title_full Relevance of aboveground litter for soil organic matter formation – a soil profile perspective
title_fullStr Relevance of aboveground litter for soil organic matter formation – a soil profile perspective
title_full_unstemmed Relevance of aboveground litter for soil organic matter formation – a soil profile perspective
title_sort relevance of aboveground litter for soil organic matter formation – a soil profile perspective
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Biogeosciences
issn 1726-4170
1726-4189
publishDate 2020-06-01
description <p>In contrast to mineral topsoils, in subsoils the origin and processes leading to the formation and stabilization of organic matter (OM) are still not well known. This study addresses the fate of litter-derived carbon (C) in whole soil profiles with regard to the conceptual cascade model, which proposes that OM formation in subsoils is linked to sorption–microbial processing–remobilization cycles during the downward migration of dissolved organic carbon (DOC). Our main objectives were to quantify the contribution of recent litter to subsoil C stocks via DOC translocation and to evaluate the stability of litter-derived OM in different functional OM fractions.</p> <p>A plot-scale stable isotope-labeling experiment was conducted in a temperate beech forest by replacing the natural litter layer with <span class="inline-formula"><sup>13</sup>C</span> enriched litter on an area of 20&thinsp;m<span class="inline-formula"><sup>2</sup></span> above a Dystric Cambisol. After 22 months of field exposure, the labeled litter was replaced again by natural litter and soil cores were drilled down to 180&thinsp;cm soil depth. Water extraction and density fractionation were combined with stable isotope measurements in order to link the fluxes of recent litter-derived C to its allocation into different functional OM fractions. A second sampling was conducted 18 months later to further account for the stability of translocated young litter-derived C.</p> <p>Almost no litter-derived particulate OM (POM) entered the subsoil, suggesting root biomass as the major source of subsoil POM. The contribution of aboveground litter to the formation of mineral-associated OM (MAOM) in topsoils (0–10&thinsp;cm) was <span class="inline-formula">1.88±0.83</span>&thinsp;g&thinsp;C&thinsp;m<span class="inline-formula"><sup>−2</sup></span> and decreased to <span class="inline-formula">0.69±0.19</span>&thinsp;g&thinsp;C&thinsp;m<span class="inline-formula"><sup>−2</sup></span> in the upper subsoil (10–50&thinsp;cm) and <span class="inline-formula">0.01±0.02</span>&thinsp;g&thinsp;C&thinsp;m<span class="inline-formula"><sup>−2</sup></span> in the deep subsoil <span class="inline-formula">&gt;100</span>&thinsp;cm soil depth during the 22 months. This finding suggests a subordinate importance of recent litter layer inputs via DOC translocation to subsoil C stocks, and implies that most of the OM in the subsoil is of older age. Smaller losses of litter-derived C within MAOM of about 66&thinsp;% compared to POM (77&thinsp;%–89&thinsp;%) over 18 months indicate that recent carbon can be stabilized by interaction with mineral surfaces; although the overall stabilization in the sandy study soils is limited. Our isotope-labeling approach supports the concept of OM undergoing a sequence of cycles of sorption, microbial processing, and desorption while migrating down a soil profile, which needs to be considered in models of soil OM formation and subsoil C cycling.</p>
url https://www.biogeosciences.net/17/3099/2020/bg-17-3099-2020.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT pliebmann relevanceofabovegroundlitterforsoilorganicmatterformationasoilprofileperspective
AT pwordelldietrich relevanceofabovegroundlitterforsoilorganicmatterformationasoilprofileperspective
AT kkalbitz relevanceofabovegroundlitterforsoilorganicmatterformationasoilprofileperspective
AT rmikutta relevanceofabovegroundlitterforsoilorganicmatterformationasoilprofileperspective
AT fkalks relevanceofabovegroundlitterforsoilorganicmatterformationasoilprofileperspective
AT adon relevanceofabovegroundlitterforsoilorganicmatterformationasoilprofileperspective
AT skwoche relevanceofabovegroundlitterforsoilorganicmatterformationasoilprofileperspective
AT lrdsilva relevanceofabovegroundlitterforsoilorganicmatterformationasoilprofileperspective
AT gguggenberger relevanceofabovegroundlitterforsoilorganicmatterformationasoilprofileperspective
_version_ 1724628842438459392
spelling doaj-185090060be54bdfbdac73e2778b92e72020-11-25T03:18:06ZengCopernicus PublicationsBiogeosciences1726-41701726-41892020-06-01173099311310.5194/bg-17-3099-2020Relevance of aboveground litter for soil organic matter formation – a soil profile perspectiveP. Liebmann0P. Wordell-Dietrich1K. Kalbitz2R. Mikutta3F. Kalks4A. Don5S. K. Woche6L. R. Dsilva7G. Guggenberger8Institute of Soil Science, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Herrenhäuser Str. 2, 30419 Hanover, GermanyInstitute of Soil Science and Site Ecology, Technische Universität Dresden, Pienner Str. 19, 01737 Tharandt, GermanyInstitute of Soil Science and Site Ecology, Technische Universität Dresden, Pienner Str. 19, 01737 Tharandt, GermanySoil Science and Soil Protection, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Von-Seckendorff-Platz 3, 06210 Halle (Saale), GermanyThünen Institute of Climate-Smart Agriculture, Bundesallee 65, 38116 Braunschweig, GermanyThünen Institute of Climate-Smart Agriculture, Bundesallee 65, 38116 Braunschweig, GermanyInstitute of Soil Science, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Herrenhäuser Str. 2, 30419 Hanover, GermanyInstitute of Soil Science and Site Ecology, Technische Universität Dresden, Pienner Str. 19, 01737 Tharandt, GermanyInstitute of Soil Science, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Herrenhäuser Str. 2, 30419 Hanover, Germany<p>In contrast to mineral topsoils, in subsoils the origin and processes leading to the formation and stabilization of organic matter (OM) are still not well known. This study addresses the fate of litter-derived carbon (C) in whole soil profiles with regard to the conceptual cascade model, which proposes that OM formation in subsoils is linked to sorption–microbial processing–remobilization cycles during the downward migration of dissolved organic carbon (DOC). Our main objectives were to quantify the contribution of recent litter to subsoil C stocks via DOC translocation and to evaluate the stability of litter-derived OM in different functional OM fractions.</p> <p>A plot-scale stable isotope-labeling experiment was conducted in a temperate beech forest by replacing the natural litter layer with <span class="inline-formula"><sup>13</sup>C</span> enriched litter on an area of 20&thinsp;m<span class="inline-formula"><sup>2</sup></span> above a Dystric Cambisol. After 22 months of field exposure, the labeled litter was replaced again by natural litter and soil cores were drilled down to 180&thinsp;cm soil depth. Water extraction and density fractionation were combined with stable isotope measurements in order to link the fluxes of recent litter-derived C to its allocation into different functional OM fractions. A second sampling was conducted 18 months later to further account for the stability of translocated young litter-derived C.</p> <p>Almost no litter-derived particulate OM (POM) entered the subsoil, suggesting root biomass as the major source of subsoil POM. The contribution of aboveground litter to the formation of mineral-associated OM (MAOM) in topsoils (0–10&thinsp;cm) was <span class="inline-formula">1.88±0.83</span>&thinsp;g&thinsp;C&thinsp;m<span class="inline-formula"><sup>−2</sup></span> and decreased to <span class="inline-formula">0.69±0.19</span>&thinsp;g&thinsp;C&thinsp;m<span class="inline-formula"><sup>−2</sup></span> in the upper subsoil (10–50&thinsp;cm) and <span class="inline-formula">0.01±0.02</span>&thinsp;g&thinsp;C&thinsp;m<span class="inline-formula"><sup>−2</sup></span> in the deep subsoil <span class="inline-formula">&gt;100</span>&thinsp;cm soil depth during the 22 months. This finding suggests a subordinate importance of recent litter layer inputs via DOC translocation to subsoil C stocks, and implies that most of the OM in the subsoil is of older age. Smaller losses of litter-derived C within MAOM of about 66&thinsp;% compared to POM (77&thinsp;%–89&thinsp;%) over 18 months indicate that recent carbon can be stabilized by interaction with mineral surfaces; although the overall stabilization in the sandy study soils is limited. Our isotope-labeling approach supports the concept of OM undergoing a sequence of cycles of sorption, microbial processing, and desorption while migrating down a soil profile, which needs to be considered in models of soil OM formation and subsoil C cycling.</p>https://www.biogeosciences.net/17/3099/2020/bg-17-3099-2020.pdf