Relevance of aboveground litter for soil organic matter formation – a soil profile perspective
<p>In contrast to mineral topsoils, in subsoils the origin and processes leading to the formation and stabilization of organic matter (OM) are still not well known. This study addresses the fate of litter-derived carbon (C) in whole soil profiles with regard to the conceptual cascade model, wh...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2020-06-01
|
Series: | Biogeosciences |
Online Access: | https://www.biogeosciences.net/17/3099/2020/bg-17-3099-2020.pdf |
id |
doaj-185090060be54bdfbdac73e2778b92e7 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
P. Liebmann P. Wordell-Dietrich K. Kalbitz R. Mikutta F. Kalks A. Don S. K. Woche L. R. Dsilva G. Guggenberger |
spellingShingle |
P. Liebmann P. Wordell-Dietrich K. Kalbitz R. Mikutta F. Kalks A. Don S. K. Woche L. R. Dsilva G. Guggenberger Relevance of aboveground litter for soil organic matter formation – a soil profile perspective Biogeosciences |
author_facet |
P. Liebmann P. Wordell-Dietrich K. Kalbitz R. Mikutta F. Kalks A. Don S. K. Woche L. R. Dsilva G. Guggenberger |
author_sort |
P. Liebmann |
title |
Relevance of aboveground litter for soil organic matter formation – a soil profile perspective |
title_short |
Relevance of aboveground litter for soil organic matter formation – a soil profile perspective |
title_full |
Relevance of aboveground litter for soil organic matter formation – a soil profile perspective |
title_fullStr |
Relevance of aboveground litter for soil organic matter formation – a soil profile perspective |
title_full_unstemmed |
Relevance of aboveground litter for soil organic matter formation – a soil profile perspective |
title_sort |
relevance of aboveground litter for soil organic matter formation – a soil profile perspective |
publisher |
Copernicus Publications |
series |
Biogeosciences |
issn |
1726-4170 1726-4189 |
publishDate |
2020-06-01 |
description |
<p>In contrast to mineral topsoils, in subsoils the origin
and processes leading to the formation and stabilization of organic matter
(OM) are still not well known. This study addresses the fate of
litter-derived carbon (C) in whole soil profiles with regard to the
conceptual cascade model, which proposes that OM formation in subsoils is
linked to sorption–microbial processing–remobilization cycles during the
downward migration of dissolved organic carbon (DOC). Our main objectives
were to quantify the contribution of recent litter to subsoil C stocks via
DOC translocation and to evaluate the stability of litter-derived OM in
different functional OM fractions.</p>
<p>A plot-scale stable isotope-labeling experiment was conducted in a temperate
beech forest by replacing the natural litter layer with <span class="inline-formula"><sup>13</sup>C</span> enriched
litter on an area of 20 m<span class="inline-formula"><sup>2</sup></span> above a Dystric Cambisol. After 22 months of
field exposure, the labeled litter was replaced again by natural litter and
soil cores were drilled down to 180 cm soil depth. Water extraction and
density fractionation were combined with stable isotope measurements in
order to link the fluxes of recent litter-derived C to its allocation into
different functional OM fractions. A second sampling was conducted 18 months
later to further account for the stability of translocated young
litter-derived C.</p>
<p>Almost no litter-derived particulate OM (POM) entered the subsoil,
suggesting root biomass as the major source of subsoil POM. The contribution
of aboveground litter to the formation of mineral-associated OM (MAOM) in
topsoils (0–10 cm) was <span class="inline-formula">1.88±0.83</span> g C m<span class="inline-formula"><sup>−2</sup></span> and decreased to
<span class="inline-formula">0.69±0.19</span> g C m<span class="inline-formula"><sup>−2</sup></span> in the upper subsoil (10–50 cm) and <span class="inline-formula">0.01±0.02</span> g C m<span class="inline-formula"><sup>−2</sup></span> in the deep subsoil <span class="inline-formula">>100</span> cm soil depth
during the 22 months. This finding suggests a subordinate importance of
recent litter layer inputs via DOC translocation to subsoil C stocks, and
implies that most of the OM in the subsoil is of older age. Smaller losses
of litter-derived C within MAOM of about 66 % compared to POM (77 %–89 %) over 18 months indicate that recent carbon can be stabilized by
interaction with mineral surfaces; although the overall stabilization in the
sandy study soils is limited. Our isotope-labeling approach supports the
concept of OM undergoing a sequence of cycles of sorption, microbial
processing, and desorption while migrating down a soil profile, which needs
to be considered in models of soil OM formation and subsoil C cycling.</p> |
url |
https://www.biogeosciences.net/17/3099/2020/bg-17-3099-2020.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT pliebmann relevanceofabovegroundlitterforsoilorganicmatterformationasoilprofileperspective AT pwordelldietrich relevanceofabovegroundlitterforsoilorganicmatterformationasoilprofileperspective AT kkalbitz relevanceofabovegroundlitterforsoilorganicmatterformationasoilprofileperspective AT rmikutta relevanceofabovegroundlitterforsoilorganicmatterformationasoilprofileperspective AT fkalks relevanceofabovegroundlitterforsoilorganicmatterformationasoilprofileperspective AT adon relevanceofabovegroundlitterforsoilorganicmatterformationasoilprofileperspective AT skwoche relevanceofabovegroundlitterforsoilorganicmatterformationasoilprofileperspective AT lrdsilva relevanceofabovegroundlitterforsoilorganicmatterformationasoilprofileperspective AT gguggenberger relevanceofabovegroundlitterforsoilorganicmatterformationasoilprofileperspective |
_version_ |
1724628842438459392 |
spelling |
doaj-185090060be54bdfbdac73e2778b92e72020-11-25T03:18:06ZengCopernicus PublicationsBiogeosciences1726-41701726-41892020-06-01173099311310.5194/bg-17-3099-2020Relevance of aboveground litter for soil organic matter formation – a soil profile perspectiveP. Liebmann0P. Wordell-Dietrich1K. Kalbitz2R. Mikutta3F. Kalks4A. Don5S. K. Woche6L. R. Dsilva7G. Guggenberger8Institute of Soil Science, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Herrenhäuser Str. 2, 30419 Hanover, GermanyInstitute of Soil Science and Site Ecology, Technische Universität Dresden, Pienner Str. 19, 01737 Tharandt, GermanyInstitute of Soil Science and Site Ecology, Technische Universität Dresden, Pienner Str. 19, 01737 Tharandt, GermanySoil Science and Soil Protection, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Von-Seckendorff-Platz 3, 06210 Halle (Saale), GermanyThünen Institute of Climate-Smart Agriculture, Bundesallee 65, 38116 Braunschweig, GermanyThünen Institute of Climate-Smart Agriculture, Bundesallee 65, 38116 Braunschweig, GermanyInstitute of Soil Science, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Herrenhäuser Str. 2, 30419 Hanover, GermanyInstitute of Soil Science and Site Ecology, Technische Universität Dresden, Pienner Str. 19, 01737 Tharandt, GermanyInstitute of Soil Science, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Herrenhäuser Str. 2, 30419 Hanover, Germany<p>In contrast to mineral topsoils, in subsoils the origin and processes leading to the formation and stabilization of organic matter (OM) are still not well known. This study addresses the fate of litter-derived carbon (C) in whole soil profiles with regard to the conceptual cascade model, which proposes that OM formation in subsoils is linked to sorption–microbial processing–remobilization cycles during the downward migration of dissolved organic carbon (DOC). Our main objectives were to quantify the contribution of recent litter to subsoil C stocks via DOC translocation and to evaluate the stability of litter-derived OM in different functional OM fractions.</p> <p>A plot-scale stable isotope-labeling experiment was conducted in a temperate beech forest by replacing the natural litter layer with <span class="inline-formula"><sup>13</sup>C</span> enriched litter on an area of 20 m<span class="inline-formula"><sup>2</sup></span> above a Dystric Cambisol. After 22 months of field exposure, the labeled litter was replaced again by natural litter and soil cores were drilled down to 180 cm soil depth. Water extraction and density fractionation were combined with stable isotope measurements in order to link the fluxes of recent litter-derived C to its allocation into different functional OM fractions. A second sampling was conducted 18 months later to further account for the stability of translocated young litter-derived C.</p> <p>Almost no litter-derived particulate OM (POM) entered the subsoil, suggesting root biomass as the major source of subsoil POM. The contribution of aboveground litter to the formation of mineral-associated OM (MAOM) in topsoils (0–10 cm) was <span class="inline-formula">1.88±0.83</span> g C m<span class="inline-formula"><sup>−2</sup></span> and decreased to <span class="inline-formula">0.69±0.19</span> g C m<span class="inline-formula"><sup>−2</sup></span> in the upper subsoil (10–50 cm) and <span class="inline-formula">0.01±0.02</span> g C m<span class="inline-formula"><sup>−2</sup></span> in the deep subsoil <span class="inline-formula">>100</span> cm soil depth during the 22 months. This finding suggests a subordinate importance of recent litter layer inputs via DOC translocation to subsoil C stocks, and implies that most of the OM in the subsoil is of older age. Smaller losses of litter-derived C within MAOM of about 66 % compared to POM (77 %–89 %) over 18 months indicate that recent carbon can be stabilized by interaction with mineral surfaces; although the overall stabilization in the sandy study soils is limited. Our isotope-labeling approach supports the concept of OM undergoing a sequence of cycles of sorption, microbial processing, and desorption while migrating down a soil profile, which needs to be considered in models of soil OM formation and subsoil C cycling.</p>https://www.biogeosciences.net/17/3099/2020/bg-17-3099-2020.pdf |