Независимо используемый дательный падеж в литовском, русском и словенском языках: некоторые замечания к сопоставительному анализу

The present article examines independent or non-subcategorized uses of the dative case in three languages: Lithuanian, Russian, and Slovenian. The analysis is based on the classification of the dative functions proposed in the literature on Lithuanian (Holvoet & Čižik-Prokaševa 2005; Rembiałkow...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Елена Коницкая
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Vilnius University Press 2021-07-01
Series:Vilnius University Open Series
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.journals.vu.lt/open-series/article/view/24493
id doaj-183d7a80c3834c6eaecd6f507ebaa093
record_format Article
spelling doaj-183d7a80c3834c6eaecd6f507ebaa0932021-07-26T09:27:41ZengVilnius University PressVilnius University Open Series2669-05352021-07-011610.15388/SBOL.2021.11Независимо используемый дательный падеж в литовском, русском и словенском языках: некоторые замечания к сопоставительному анализуЕлена Коницкая0Vilnius University, Lithuania The present article examines independent or non-subcategorized uses of the dative case in three languages: Lithuanian, Russian, and Slovenian. The analysis is based on the classification of the dative functions proposed in the literature on Lithuanian (Holvoet & Čižik-Prokaševa 2005; Rembiałkowska 2007): 1) dativus ethicus, 2) dativus iudicantis; 3) dativus sympatethicus; 4) dativus commodi. The comparative methodology is based on establishing similarities and differences between the examples in each group identified in Lithuanian and their Slavic counterparts. The analysis shows that the first group is represented in all three languages, while in the other three groups considerable differences are observed. In some cases, in the second group, the Lithuanian non-subcategorized dative corresponds to the Russian construction для (‘for’) + GEN, and to the Slovenian construction za (‘for’) + ACC. In the third and fourth groups, the Lithuanian dative case, which usually represents an external possessor, often corresponds to the Slovenian dative, differing nonetheless from Russian where the construction y (‘at’) + GEN is used. https://www.journals.vu.lt/open-series/article/view/24493non-subcategorized dativeexternal possessionLithuanianRussianSlovenian
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Елена Коницкая
spellingShingle Елена Коницкая
Независимо используемый дательный падеж в литовском, русском и словенском языках: некоторые замечания к сопоставительному анализу
Vilnius University Open Series
non-subcategorized dative
external possession
Lithuanian
Russian
Slovenian
author_facet Елена Коницкая
author_sort Елена Коницкая
title Независимо используемый дательный падеж в литовском, русском и словенском языках: некоторые замечания к сопоставительному анализу
title_short Независимо используемый дательный падеж в литовском, русском и словенском языках: некоторые замечания к сопоставительному анализу
title_full Независимо используемый дательный падеж в литовском, русском и словенском языках: некоторые замечания к сопоставительному анализу
title_fullStr Независимо используемый дательный падеж в литовском, русском и словенском языках: некоторые замечания к сопоставительному анализу
title_full_unstemmed Независимо используемый дательный падеж в литовском, русском и словенском языках: некоторые замечания к сопоставительному анализу
title_sort независимо используемый дательный падеж в литовском, русском и словенском языках: некоторые замечания к сопоставительному анализу
publisher Vilnius University Press
series Vilnius University Open Series
issn 2669-0535
publishDate 2021-07-01
description The present article examines independent or non-subcategorized uses of the dative case in three languages: Lithuanian, Russian, and Slovenian. The analysis is based on the classification of the dative functions proposed in the literature on Lithuanian (Holvoet & Čižik-Prokaševa 2005; Rembiałkowska 2007): 1) dativus ethicus, 2) dativus iudicantis; 3) dativus sympatethicus; 4) dativus commodi. The comparative methodology is based on establishing similarities and differences between the examples in each group identified in Lithuanian and their Slavic counterparts. The analysis shows that the first group is represented in all three languages, while in the other three groups considerable differences are observed. In some cases, in the second group, the Lithuanian non-subcategorized dative corresponds to the Russian construction для (‘for’) + GEN, and to the Slovenian construction za (‘for’) + ACC. In the third and fourth groups, the Lithuanian dative case, which usually represents an external possessor, often corresponds to the Slovenian dative, differing nonetheless from Russian where the construction y (‘at’) + GEN is used.
topic non-subcategorized dative
external possession
Lithuanian
Russian
Slovenian
url https://www.journals.vu.lt/open-series/article/view/24493
work_keys_str_mv AT elenakonickaâ nezavisimoispolʹzuemyjdatelʹnyjpadežvlitovskomrusskomislovenskomâzykahnekotoryezamečaniâksopostavitelʹnomuanalizu
_version_ 1721281818962952192