Competition with Variety Seeking and Habitual Consumption: Price Commitment or Quality Commitment?

This paper investigates price and quality competition in a market where consumers seek variety and habit formation. Variety seeking is modeled as a decrease in the willingness to pay for product purchased on the previous occasion while habitual consumption may increase future marginal utility. We co...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Liyang Xiong, Guan Liu, Shi Jiang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2017-01-01
Series:Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/9845651
id doaj-182fd8f7376c451a9052836807e2c054
record_format Article
spelling doaj-182fd8f7376c451a9052836807e2c0542020-11-24T21:41:25ZengHindawi LimitedMathematical Problems in Engineering1024-123X1563-51472017-01-01201710.1155/2017/98456519845651Competition with Variety Seeking and Habitual Consumption: Price Commitment or Quality Commitment?Liyang Xiong0Guan Liu1Shi Jiang2School of Management, Department of Business Administration, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, ChinaSchool of Management, Department of Business Administration, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, ChinaNetwork and Educational Technology Center, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, ChinaThis paper investigates price and quality competition in a market where consumers seek variety and habit formation. Variety seeking is modeled as a decrease in the willingness to pay for product purchased on the previous occasion while habitual consumption may increase future marginal utility. We compare two competing strategies: price commitment and quality commitment. With a three-stage Hotelling-type model, we show that variety seeking intensifies while habitual consumption softens the competition. With price commitment, firms supply lower quality levels in period 1 and higher quality levels in period 2, while, with quality commitment, firms charge higher prices in period 1 and lower prices in period 2. However, the habitual consumption brings the opposite effect. In addition, with quality commitment variety seeking leads to a lower profit and a higher consumer surplus, while habitual consumption leads to the opposite results. On the other side, with price commitment these behaviors have no effect on the consumer surplus, although they still lower down the firm profits. Finally, we also identify conditions under which one strategy outperforms the other.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/9845651
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Liyang Xiong
Guan Liu
Shi Jiang
spellingShingle Liyang Xiong
Guan Liu
Shi Jiang
Competition with Variety Seeking and Habitual Consumption: Price Commitment or Quality Commitment?
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
author_facet Liyang Xiong
Guan Liu
Shi Jiang
author_sort Liyang Xiong
title Competition with Variety Seeking and Habitual Consumption: Price Commitment or Quality Commitment?
title_short Competition with Variety Seeking and Habitual Consumption: Price Commitment or Quality Commitment?
title_full Competition with Variety Seeking and Habitual Consumption: Price Commitment or Quality Commitment?
title_fullStr Competition with Variety Seeking and Habitual Consumption: Price Commitment or Quality Commitment?
title_full_unstemmed Competition with Variety Seeking and Habitual Consumption: Price Commitment or Quality Commitment?
title_sort competition with variety seeking and habitual consumption: price commitment or quality commitment?
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Mathematical Problems in Engineering
issn 1024-123X
1563-5147
publishDate 2017-01-01
description This paper investigates price and quality competition in a market where consumers seek variety and habit formation. Variety seeking is modeled as a decrease in the willingness to pay for product purchased on the previous occasion while habitual consumption may increase future marginal utility. We compare two competing strategies: price commitment and quality commitment. With a three-stage Hotelling-type model, we show that variety seeking intensifies while habitual consumption softens the competition. With price commitment, firms supply lower quality levels in period 1 and higher quality levels in period 2, while, with quality commitment, firms charge higher prices in period 1 and lower prices in period 2. However, the habitual consumption brings the opposite effect. In addition, with quality commitment variety seeking leads to a lower profit and a higher consumer surplus, while habitual consumption leads to the opposite results. On the other side, with price commitment these behaviors have no effect on the consumer surplus, although they still lower down the firm profits. Finally, we also identify conditions under which one strategy outperforms the other.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/9845651
work_keys_str_mv AT liyangxiong competitionwithvarietyseekingandhabitualconsumptionpricecommitmentorqualitycommitment
AT guanliu competitionwithvarietyseekingandhabitualconsumptionpricecommitmentorqualitycommitment
AT shijiang competitionwithvarietyseekingandhabitualconsumptionpricecommitmentorqualitycommitment
_version_ 1725922113774157824