How well suited are current thermodynamic models to predict or interpret the composition of (Ba,Sr)SO4 solid-solutions in geothermal scalings?

Abstract In this study, we report results of the analysis of a particularly interesting scaling sample from the geothermal plant in Neustadt-Glewe in northern Germany, which contained 19% Galena (PbS) and 81% of a heterogeneous assemblage of (Ba,Sr)SO4 crystals with varying compositions, 0.15 < X...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Frank Heberling, Dieter Schild, Detlev Degering, Thorsten Schäfer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2017-06-01
Series:Geothermal Energy
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40517-017-0068-x
id doaj-18138a533bcf47f3929a1cb9475566f6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-18138a533bcf47f3929a1cb9475566f62020-11-25T01:42:26ZengSpringerOpenGeothermal Energy2195-97062017-06-015111610.1186/s40517-017-0068-xHow well suited are current thermodynamic models to predict or interpret the composition of (Ba,Sr)SO4 solid-solutions in geothermal scalings?Frank Heberling0Dieter Schild1Detlev Degering2Thorsten Schäfer3Institute for Nuclear Waste Disposal, Karlsruhe Institute of TechnologyInstitute for Nuclear Waste Disposal, Karlsruhe Institute of TechnologyVKTA-Strahlenschutz, Analytik & Entsorgung Rossendorf e. V.Institute for Nuclear Waste Disposal, Karlsruhe Institute of TechnologyAbstract In this study, we report results of the analysis of a particularly interesting scaling sample from the geothermal plant in Neustadt-Glewe in northern Germany, which contained 19% Galena (PbS) and 81% of a heterogeneous assemblage of (Ba,Sr)SO4 crystals with varying compositions, 0.15 < X Ba < 0.53. A main fraction of the sample (~56%) has a barite content of X Ba ≈ 0.32. We try to relate the solid composition of the (Ba,Sr)SO4 solid-solution to the conditions at the geothermal plant concerning temperature, pressure, and solution composition, and discuss it with respect to the challenges in modelling the composition of (Ba,Sr)SO4 solid-solutions on the basis of thermodynamic mixing models. We note that considerable uncertainties are related to the description of (Ba,Sr)SO4 formation by means of thermodynamic models. The scaling composition observed in this study would be in line with endmember solubilities as predicted by the PhreeqC-Pitzer database for 70 °C and an interaction parameter, a 0 = 1.6. According to such a model, the scaling heterogeneity would reflect bimodal precipitation behaviour due to various degrees of depletion of the brine with respect to X(Ba)(aq). Minor fluctuations in X(Ba)(aq): 0.0017 < X(Ba)(aq) < 0.0042 explain the full range of observed solid compositions. The choice especially of the interaction parameter seems to some extent arbitrary. This knowledge gap strongly limits the interpretation of (Ba,Sr)SO4 compositions. Thus, it is not possible to distinguish between kinetic and thermodynamic effects on partitioning or to use the solid-solution composition to draw conclusions about the precipitation conditions (e.g. Temperature).http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40517-017-0068-x
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Frank Heberling
Dieter Schild
Detlev Degering
Thorsten Schäfer
spellingShingle Frank Heberling
Dieter Schild
Detlev Degering
Thorsten Schäfer
How well suited are current thermodynamic models to predict or interpret the composition of (Ba,Sr)SO4 solid-solutions in geothermal scalings?
Geothermal Energy
author_facet Frank Heberling
Dieter Schild
Detlev Degering
Thorsten Schäfer
author_sort Frank Heberling
title How well suited are current thermodynamic models to predict or interpret the composition of (Ba,Sr)SO4 solid-solutions in geothermal scalings?
title_short How well suited are current thermodynamic models to predict or interpret the composition of (Ba,Sr)SO4 solid-solutions in geothermal scalings?
title_full How well suited are current thermodynamic models to predict or interpret the composition of (Ba,Sr)SO4 solid-solutions in geothermal scalings?
title_fullStr How well suited are current thermodynamic models to predict or interpret the composition of (Ba,Sr)SO4 solid-solutions in geothermal scalings?
title_full_unstemmed How well suited are current thermodynamic models to predict or interpret the composition of (Ba,Sr)SO4 solid-solutions in geothermal scalings?
title_sort how well suited are current thermodynamic models to predict or interpret the composition of (ba,sr)so4 solid-solutions in geothermal scalings?
publisher SpringerOpen
series Geothermal Energy
issn 2195-9706
publishDate 2017-06-01
description Abstract In this study, we report results of the analysis of a particularly interesting scaling sample from the geothermal plant in Neustadt-Glewe in northern Germany, which contained 19% Galena (PbS) and 81% of a heterogeneous assemblage of (Ba,Sr)SO4 crystals with varying compositions, 0.15 < X Ba < 0.53. A main fraction of the sample (~56%) has a barite content of X Ba ≈ 0.32. We try to relate the solid composition of the (Ba,Sr)SO4 solid-solution to the conditions at the geothermal plant concerning temperature, pressure, and solution composition, and discuss it with respect to the challenges in modelling the composition of (Ba,Sr)SO4 solid-solutions on the basis of thermodynamic mixing models. We note that considerable uncertainties are related to the description of (Ba,Sr)SO4 formation by means of thermodynamic models. The scaling composition observed in this study would be in line with endmember solubilities as predicted by the PhreeqC-Pitzer database for 70 °C and an interaction parameter, a 0 = 1.6. According to such a model, the scaling heterogeneity would reflect bimodal precipitation behaviour due to various degrees of depletion of the brine with respect to X(Ba)(aq). Minor fluctuations in X(Ba)(aq): 0.0017 < X(Ba)(aq) < 0.0042 explain the full range of observed solid compositions. The choice especially of the interaction parameter seems to some extent arbitrary. This knowledge gap strongly limits the interpretation of (Ba,Sr)SO4 compositions. Thus, it is not possible to distinguish between kinetic and thermodynamic effects on partitioning or to use the solid-solution composition to draw conclusions about the precipitation conditions (e.g. Temperature).
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40517-017-0068-x
work_keys_str_mv AT frankheberling howwellsuitedarecurrentthermodynamicmodelstopredictorinterpretthecompositionofbasrso4solidsolutionsingeothermalscalings
AT dieterschild howwellsuitedarecurrentthermodynamicmodelstopredictorinterpretthecompositionofbasrso4solidsolutionsingeothermalscalings
AT detlevdegering howwellsuitedarecurrentthermodynamicmodelstopredictorinterpretthecompositionofbasrso4solidsolutionsingeothermalscalings
AT thorstenschafer howwellsuitedarecurrentthermodynamicmodelstopredictorinterpretthecompositionofbasrso4solidsolutionsingeothermalscalings
_version_ 1725036323496001536