A small effect of conservation agriculture on soil biodiversity that differs between biological kingdoms and geographic locations

Summary: Larger easily visible animals and plants are negatively affected by agrochemicals used for intensive food production, but we do not understand the general spatial and temporal effects of agrochemicals on the multitudes of bacteria, fungi, and small invertebrate animals that underpin ecosyst...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Paulina Giraldo-Perez, Victoria Raw, Marc Greven, Matthew R. Goddard
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-04-01
Series:iScience
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589004221002480
id doaj-1807e9b109fa4cb7b13142c0864a43e7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1807e9b109fa4cb7b13142c0864a43e72021-04-26T05:57:37ZengElsevieriScience2589-00422021-04-01244102280A small effect of conservation agriculture on soil biodiversity that differs between biological kingdoms and geographic locationsPaulina Giraldo-Perez0Victoria Raw1Marc Greven2Matthew R. Goddard3The School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland 1010, New ZealandThe New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research Limited – Rangahau Ahumāra Kai, PO Box 845, Blenheim, New ZealandThe New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research Limited – Rangahau Ahumāra Kai, PO Box 845, Blenheim, New ZealandThe School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland 1010, New Zealand; The School of Life Sciences, University of Lincoln, Lincoln LN6 7DL, UK; Corresponding authorSummary: Larger easily visible animals and plants are negatively affected by agrochemicals used for intensive food production, but we do not understand the general spatial and temporal effects of agrochemicals on the multitudes of bacteria, fungi, and small invertebrate animals that underpin ecosystem productivity. We sequenced the 16S, ITS2, and COI DNA barcode regions from 648 New Zealand vineyard soil samples managed under either conventional or low-agrochemical-input conservation approaches across two regions and three seasons in 1 year and discovered at least 170,000 phylotypes (taxa) with >97% genetic identity. Management approach correlated with a significant 2%–10% difference in the abundances of phylotypes that differed over regions and seasons. Although the data show that agrochemicals do not have a large effect on soil biodiversity on average, the important finding is that the magnitude of impact differs between taxa types and locations, and some taxa most affected also influence the quality of agricultural produce.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589004221002480MicroorganismFarming ManagementFarming SystemsRelation between Agriculture and EnvironmentSoil BiologyBeverage
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Paulina Giraldo-Perez
Victoria Raw
Marc Greven
Matthew R. Goddard
spellingShingle Paulina Giraldo-Perez
Victoria Raw
Marc Greven
Matthew R. Goddard
A small effect of conservation agriculture on soil biodiversity that differs between biological kingdoms and geographic locations
iScience
Microorganism
Farming Management
Farming Systems
Relation between Agriculture and Environment
Soil Biology
Beverage
author_facet Paulina Giraldo-Perez
Victoria Raw
Marc Greven
Matthew R. Goddard
author_sort Paulina Giraldo-Perez
title A small effect of conservation agriculture on soil biodiversity that differs between biological kingdoms and geographic locations
title_short A small effect of conservation agriculture on soil biodiversity that differs between biological kingdoms and geographic locations
title_full A small effect of conservation agriculture on soil biodiversity that differs between biological kingdoms and geographic locations
title_fullStr A small effect of conservation agriculture on soil biodiversity that differs between biological kingdoms and geographic locations
title_full_unstemmed A small effect of conservation agriculture on soil biodiversity that differs between biological kingdoms and geographic locations
title_sort small effect of conservation agriculture on soil biodiversity that differs between biological kingdoms and geographic locations
publisher Elsevier
series iScience
issn 2589-0042
publishDate 2021-04-01
description Summary: Larger easily visible animals and plants are negatively affected by agrochemicals used for intensive food production, but we do not understand the general spatial and temporal effects of agrochemicals on the multitudes of bacteria, fungi, and small invertebrate animals that underpin ecosystem productivity. We sequenced the 16S, ITS2, and COI DNA barcode regions from 648 New Zealand vineyard soil samples managed under either conventional or low-agrochemical-input conservation approaches across two regions and three seasons in 1 year and discovered at least 170,000 phylotypes (taxa) with >97% genetic identity. Management approach correlated with a significant 2%–10% difference in the abundances of phylotypes that differed over regions and seasons. Although the data show that agrochemicals do not have a large effect on soil biodiversity on average, the important finding is that the magnitude of impact differs between taxa types and locations, and some taxa most affected also influence the quality of agricultural produce.
topic Microorganism
Farming Management
Farming Systems
Relation between Agriculture and Environment
Soil Biology
Beverage
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589004221002480
work_keys_str_mv AT paulinagiraldoperez asmalleffectofconservationagricultureonsoilbiodiversitythatdiffersbetweenbiologicalkingdomsandgeographiclocations
AT victoriaraw asmalleffectofconservationagricultureonsoilbiodiversitythatdiffersbetweenbiologicalkingdomsandgeographiclocations
AT marcgreven asmalleffectofconservationagricultureonsoilbiodiversitythatdiffersbetweenbiologicalkingdomsandgeographiclocations
AT matthewrgoddard asmalleffectofconservationagricultureonsoilbiodiversitythatdiffersbetweenbiologicalkingdomsandgeographiclocations
AT paulinagiraldoperez smalleffectofconservationagricultureonsoilbiodiversitythatdiffersbetweenbiologicalkingdomsandgeographiclocations
AT victoriaraw smalleffectofconservationagricultureonsoilbiodiversitythatdiffersbetweenbiologicalkingdomsandgeographiclocations
AT marcgreven smalleffectofconservationagricultureonsoilbiodiversitythatdiffersbetweenbiologicalkingdomsandgeographiclocations
AT matthewrgoddard smalleffectofconservationagricultureonsoilbiodiversitythatdiffersbetweenbiologicalkingdomsandgeographiclocations
_version_ 1721507777541570560